• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Denon AVR-X4800H AVR Review

Rate this AVR

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 11 3.1%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 73 20.3%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 194 54.0%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 81 22.6%

  • Total voters
    359
Roon Ready coming soon...
Screenshot_2023-12-14-23-16-37-654_com.roon.mobile1x~01.jpg
Screenshot_2023-12-14-23-14-31-314_com.roon.mobile1x~01.jpg

Translation: Unfortunately, the manufacturer has not yet completed the certification of this device.

P.s. I use Roon Remote Legacy and Roon Server 1.8.

Can anyone check with the latest version of Roon Server?
 
Last edited:
All current NAD devices have two independent sub outs and will soon get DLBC.
The M66 even is 2.4 able.
How soon? :) I have been waiting for DLBC on M33 for close to 2 years (and this was promised to be really-soon-now then)
 
My Denon X4800h is also Roon uncertified. Hope that it becomes certified. If anyone has additional information, please post
 
My Denon X4800h is also Roon uncertified. Hope that it becomes certified. If anyone has additional information, please post
The fact that it's showing up as an uncertified Roon Ready endpoint means that D+M have implemented RAAT in the newest firmware version and we are just waiting for it to be enabled on the Roon Remote side, which I imagine will happen by December 20th (same time as the announcement on Audioholics).
 
Can someone confirm if there is any difference in using the digital coax input vs the optical toslink input on the the X4800H? I want to connect a Wiim Pro to the AVR to use as my music streamer, and I'm not sure if there are any considerations between the two that I should be aware of? This could be related to digital signal capabilities for hifi audio signals, or it could simply be in terms of simplicity of switching between sources on the AVR.
 
The fact that it's showing up as an uncertified Roon Ready endpoint means that D+M have implemented RAAT in the newest firmware version and we are just waiting for it to be enabled on the Roon Remote side, which I imagine will happen by December 20th (same time as the announcement on Audioholics).
I was trying to find the announcement on Audioholics you reference. Could you please share a link if possible? Thanks.
 
I was trying to find the announcement on Audioholics you reference. Could you please share a link if possible? Thanks.
Here it is:

 
Can someone confirm if there is any difference in using the digital coax input vs the optical toslink input on the the X4800H? I want to connect a Wiim Pro to the AVR to use as my music streamer, and I'm not sure if there are any considerations between the two that I should be aware of? This could be related to digital signal capabilities for hifi audio signals, or it could simply be in terms of simplicity of switching between sources on the AVR.
The bandwidth will be the same, probably 24b/192k, in either case. Toslink is not electrically coupled, so it can avoid the introduction of ground loops into your system. Probably not an issue for the Wiim, but I generally prefer optical for this reason.
 
Here it is:

Thanks. I clicked on the video but it says it won't be active until December 20th. Were you somehow able to view this video to get the Roon information?
 
According to Peter Lie from Lumin, the Roon Ready Uncertified Message occurs "when the manufacturer includes the RAAT SDK in the firmware. If it has not gone through the Roon Ready certification, then it will show as Uncertified and users will not be able to use it, until the certification is completed." (from the Roon forum). So maybe this is very good news for owners of the Denon x4800h.
 
Quick review of my 4800:

I have a 4800 because my 4700 died after only 2.9 years. First, it started going into Audyssey calibration mode randomly. Then, it went into protection mode, which persisted after a factory reset with nothing plugged in. Denon support said it needed to be repaired and indicated it would take "quite a while" to get it back, so I purchased a 4800 on sale for ~$1700 to have something to use.

The Cons:
1. I really miss the front HDMI port, as I used it for calibration. I bought a 2' pigtail to reach the back and find it annoying
2. The Audyssey mic arrived broken and was replaced by Denon support with a round(?) one in a few weeks time
3. Sending an Audyssey profile from the MultiEQ app overwrites the Dirac slots on that preset
4. Sending a Dirac profile to a Dirac slot overwrites the Audyssey profile on that preset

The Pros:
1. It sounds exactly the same as my 4700 did, save for differences in the the DRC calibration, which means it sounds great
2. It has fewer nonsense inputs on the back
3. Speaker layout configuration is much simpler--especially for disconnecting internal amps
4. It supports Dirac, including DLBC!

With some effort using MultiEQ app and editing the JSON files directly, I was able to get very good results from Audyssey as usual. I have made one calibration attempt with Dirac and achieved very good results, but I can improve it with further iterations.

Overall, I am pleased with the features and performance of the 4800. However, it needs to last at least 10 years for it to compare with the Sony and Yamaha units I have used in the past, which have lasted 20+ years.

I have researched this and have not found an answer. Is the 4800 supposed to be able to hold both Audyssey and Dirac profiles and allow the user to switch between them for comparison?
 
Last edited:
Is the 4800 supposed to be able to hold both Audyssey and Dirac profiles and allow the user to switch between them for comparison?
Yes. It has two fully independent speaker presets. Use button "Option" on the remote to choose current preset. Then you can run setup for this preset.
For Dirac it also allows to save three configuration slots (within one speaker preset).
 
Yes. It has two fully independent speaker presets. Use button "Option" on the remote to choose current preset. Then you can run setup for this preset.
For Dirac it also allows to save three configuration slots (within one speaker preset).

OK. It's a per preset thing. I use preset 1 for 7.2.2 movies / television and preset 2 for music. I was hoping preset 2 could hold both Audyssey and Dirac profiles for easy comparison, but that is not part of the feature set. Thanks for the clarification.

I am currently using Audyssey on preset 1 for the aforementioned video sources and Dirac on preset 2 for audio sources. I have only had time for 1 round of calibration of each and plan to spend more time with both to maximize my results.

Just for fun, here is Audyssey limited to 1100Hz:

F206 LR XT32 1100 Sub+.png


And here is Dirac with my custom target limited to 1000Hz:

F206 Dirac Custom 1000 Left Right.png


Here is Dirac with its default target:
F206 Dirac Default Full Shelved Left Right.png



Here is what I managed with Audyssey limited to 100Hz on the 4700 after some work:

F206 Left Right Def Sub+ 1100.png


All are good, but more work to be done as I find the time...

I have to wonder if DLBC is worth the cost consider the results I am getting without it?
 
Last edited:
I won't be getting DLBC since I don't have subs (my main full range can reproduce bass down to 20Hz) and I'm glad to confirm that I won't be forced to purchase it as an upgrade to ART. It was also confirmed that the processor in the 4800 has enough power to run ART, lets just hope that Denon introduces it.
 
I won't be getting DLBC since I don't have subs (my main full range can reproduce bass down to 20Hz) and I'm glad to confirm that I won't be forced to purchase it as an upgrade to ART. It was also confirmed that the processor in the 4800 has enough power to run ART, lets just hope that Denon introduces it.
Where has that been confirmed?
 
Back
Top Bottom