• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Denon AVR-X3800H Review

Rate this AVR

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 83 18.7%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 209 47.1%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 120 27.0%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 32 7.2%

  • Total voters
    444

Music707

Active Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2022
Messages
177
Likes
207
I understand DLBC is another 199$ or so upgrade, and further in the future.

I would not wait, but well, if you must have DLBC...

AVRs seem to have a lot of differing use cases. If e. g. one likes Dirac Live and is some kind of "basshead" DLBC for the 4 sub outputs on the new Denons may be a straightforward choice.

Personally, I will potentially keep on wating even longer for Dirac MIMO (and not buy before I know on what models it will run). Furtunately, I am in no hurry at all.
 

Trell

Major Contributor
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
2,752
Likes
3,286
AVRs seem to have a lot of differing use cases. If e. g. one likes Dirac Live and is some kind of "basshead" DLBC for the 4 sub outputs on the new Denons may be a straightforward choice.

Personally, I will potentially keep on wating even longer for Dirac MIMO (and not buy before I know on what models it will run). Furtunately, I am in no hurry at all.
Dirac Live only supports one subwoofer while Audyssey XT32 has support for at least two, even in older receivers. For more than one subwoofer one has to buy a DLBC license, that will be offered in the future sometime i.e. vaporware. Still expensive, though, for those with more than one subwoofer. Still lacks dynamic volume so a downgrade in sound quality.

The main point of multiple subwoofers is for more even bass, not just because you’re a “basshead”.
 

ban25

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Nov 5, 2022
Messages
753
Likes
747
Hi everyone! I have a little question. If my room need correction, what should give me the best results, the x3700h with audyssey or the x3800h with dirac? Looks like X3700h > x3800h and dirac > audyssey, which one will have the biggest impact? Also, si there any alternative under 5000$? Any avr or processor with dirac that mesured well? Thank you!

Any X3700H you can buy new today (manufactured after May 2021 and ending with a serial number higher than 70001) has the same TI DACs as found in the X3800H and therefore the same SINAD performance. Additionally, AKM models manufactured before that date have a broken HDMI 2.1 implementation which is actually a huge problem for anyone who needs it (say if you have a PS5 or Xbox Series X).

As for Dirac Live. Without DLBC, which the RZ50 lacks and which the X3800H may not have until 2024, I'm not sure I'd necessarily go with it over Audyssey XT32 (which does do bass correction). I've had very good results with Audyssey MultiEQ-X ($200 on PC) on the X3700H and I likely will go with it next year over Dirac on the Cinema 40 at least until DLBC is available. Also note that the X3700H has dual independent subwoofer out, and the X3800H has 4-way independent subwoofer out. The RZ50 only has a single (mirrored) subwoofer out.

It's a shame that Amir's review does not mention the AKM fire nor the DAC change that happened on all Denon receivers in 2021. I think it's causing a lot of confusion where people are thinking that *any* X3700H is better than the X3800H, which is simply not true (especially with the HDMI bug).
 

Music707

Active Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2022
Messages
177
Likes
207
Dirac Live only supports one subwoofer while Audyssey XT32 has support for at least two, even in older receivers. For more than one subwoofer one has to buy a DLBC license, that will be offered in the future sometime i.e. vaporware. Still expensive, though, for those with more than one subwoofer. Still lacks dynamic volume so a downgrade in sound quality.

The main point of multiple subwoofers is for more even bass, not just because you’re a “basshead”.

You seem to overinterpret my simple statement. I was just trying to give one example why somebody interested in the 4 sub outs might look forward to DLBC.

Feel free to replace "basshead" with e. g. "tasteful audiophile" (or just some other fitting characterization of some group of people with a specific interest in audio) if this is more to your liking. I won't disagree because I was aware of the usefulness of multiple subs before your kind and of course correct remark. But even after an adjustment the example remains just an example.

Let me try to make my major point in a different way. The 4 independent sub outs may be interesting for some or even many. For those, DL without BC does not make the most sense. The two most reasonable options seem to be either staying with Audyssey or aiming at DLBC. I am not making any recommendation for one over the other. But the RZ50 may not be an alternative here.
 

GalZohar

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2021
Messages
449
Likes
218
I'm guessing because the youtubers rarely give a bad review, knowing if they did manufacturers would be hesitant to send any more product to them. On the other hand if a manufacturer sends product to Amir or Erin they do so knowing that measurements don't lie. So they'd have to be pretty confident in their product to do so.
The way that they test it, there is no sensible way for them to write a bad review, as all the potential flaws are not properly revealed in their testing, and therefore all AVRs are the same except the interface...

I understand DLBC is another 199$ or so upgrade, and further in the future.

I would not wait, but well, if you must have DLBC...
Yes it is, but a chance for DLBC in the future is better than no chance. Plus multi-sub support out of the box rather than single sub only. If you plan to use the device for a long time, I'd still consider an x3800h over RZ-50 (if you can even find an RZ-50), although if you don't absolutely have to buy an AVR this year I'd keep waiting until DLBC is implemented and working correctly or at least until there are some appropriate (blind and apples to apples) comparisons of Audyssey vs Dirac, which will probably be easier to conduct once the Denon AVRs are available with both.
 

Fidji

Active Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
260
Likes
547
Also note that the X3700H has dual independent subwoofer out, and the X3800H has 4-way independent subwoofer out. The RZ50 only has a single (mirrored) subwoofer out.
Technically, these are not independent subwoofers (3700), they will still receive the same signal. You just can indpendently change gain and delay.

3800 can direct different signal to each of 4 subs, although the implementation is quite awkward.
 

Rottmannash

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 11, 2020
Messages
2,986
Likes
2,633
Location
Nashville
Technically, these are not independent subwoofers (3700), they will still receive the same signal. You just can indpendently change gain and delay.

3800 can direct different signal to each of 4 subs, although the implementation is quite awkward.
Out of curiosity, why would one want 4 separate sub outputs? Does any soundtrack have 4 separate sub channels?
 

DMill

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 9, 2022
Messages
929
Likes
1,323
Out of curiosity, why would one want 4 separate sub outputs? Does any soundtrack have 4 separate sub channels?
You can put multiple subs in a room so bass response is not localized. It seems that more members than I thought have room for 4 subwoofers. I do not in my space.
 

Rottmannash

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 11, 2020
Messages
2,986
Likes
2,633
Location
Nashville
You can put multiple subs in a room so bass response is not localized. It seems that more members than I thought have room for 4 subwoofers. I do not in my space.
Not speaking of 4 subs, but the previous poster intimated having 4 separate sub outputs were somehow more desirable than 4 sub outs that all contain the same program material. I was just looking for clarification on why this would be preferable over the 3800's 4 independent sub outs but all sending the exact same program material.
 

Fidji

Active Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
260
Likes
547
Out of curiosity, why would one want 4 separate sub outputs? Does any soundtrack have 4 separate sub channels?
tecnically - whatever amount of subs you have, your setup will still be x.1.x (unless you are able to put your hands on handful of available DtsX Pro mixes, that have 2 LFE channels), so here you are right.

Still there is lot of bass content in all the other channels, that you normally bass manage and lump together in your subs. So independent sub routing makes sense, if you use AVP as an active crossover.

e.g. in my current 9.6.7 setup I have one sub dedicated just for C channel, creating “large“ speaker. This sub has no LFE duty. Although my C is 3 way/4 drivers 1.2m wide monster, it still benefits from extra driver to take it down to 20Hz. Immersion and screen side sound coherence improved dramatically compared to usual “let’s send everything below 80 Hz to all subs” approach.
 
Last edited:

Sancus

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 30, 2018
Messages
2,926
Likes
7,643
Location
Canada
Not speaking of 4 subs, but the previous poster intimated having 4 separate sub outputs were somehow more desirable than 4 sub outs that all contain the same program material. I was just looking for clarification on why this would be preferable over the 3800's 4 independent sub outs but all sending the exact same program material.
It's not about program material but about being able to change each sub signal independently with EQ. That was not possible at all due to hardware limitations in prior Denons. It's a requirement for DLBC to function as well as other modern multi-sub optimizers like MSO.
 

DrDal701

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2022
Messages
5
Likes
7
Any X3700H you can buy new today (manufactured after May 2021 and ending with a serial number higher than 70001) has the same TI DACs as found in the X3800H and therefore the same SINAD performance. Additionally, AKM models manufactured before that date have a broken HDMI 2.1 implementation which is actually a huge problem for anyone who needs it (say if you have a PS5 or Xbox Series X).

As for Dirac Live. Without DLBC, which the RZ50 lacks and which the X3800H may not have until 2024, I'm not sure I'd necessarily go with it over Audyssey XT32 (which does do bass correction). I've had very good results with Audyssey MultiEQ-X ($200 on PC) on the X3700H and I likely will go with it next year over Dirac on the Cinema 40 at least until DLBC is available. Also note that the X3700H has dual independent subwoofer out, and the X3800H has 4-way independent subwoofer out. The RZ50 only has a single (mirrored) subwoofer out.

It's a shame that Amir's review does not mention the AKM fire nor the DAC change that happened on all Denon receivers in 2021. I think it's causing a lot of confusion where people are thinking that *any* X3700H is better than the X3800H, which is simply not true (especially with the HDMI bug).
"Any X3700H you can buy new today (manufactured after May 2021 and ending with a serial number higher than 70001) has the same TI DACs as found in the X3800H and therefore the same SINAD performance".

Would the same apply to an X4700H bought new today and the new X4800H?
 

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,406
Likes
18,370
Location
Netherlands
You have to be more precise than that.. it says exactly this:
4A0EB702-87F9-493C-973A-29A27BBCB9D1.jpeg
 

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,406
Likes
18,370
Location
Netherlands

Fidji

Active Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
260
Likes
547
Thanks! Okay, so this is a bit different indeed. So I assume there is some option to tell what is the closest speaker to any of the subs then?

In the end though, this is just a matter of mixing signals. The frequency response correction is still done globally.
Actually this is where I am not fully clear [actually I was thinking about buying top of the line Marantz to my tertiary setup]

If I understand it correctly - either you use "standard" setting - and then you do Audyssey SUB EQ HT - and global EQ.
OR
You use "directional" and then you EQ each sub individually

This is why it is "awkward" to me.
 

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,406
Likes
18,370
Location
Netherlands
Actually this is where I am not fully clear [actually I was thinking about buying top of the line Marantz to my tertiary setup]

If I understand it correctly - either you use "standard" setting - and then you do Audyssey SUB EQ HT - and global EQ.
OR
You use "directional" and then you EQ each sub individually

This is why it is "awkward" to me.
I don't think so. The directional function is just a mixing feature. Whatever Audyssey does, is on top of this. There is no per-sub EQ.
 
Top Bottom