Yeah, who needs such nonsense devices when Denon 3800 (and probably 2800 too) does all the same but so much better + much much more for ~ the same priceThe general message is "good enough" measured performance.
Yeah, who needs such nonsense devices when Denon 3800 (and probably 2800 too) does all the same but so much better + much much more for ~ the same priceThe general message is "good enough" measured performance.
It's also Roon Ready, which is great!The BlueOS is, before anything, a very efficient multi room system.
I don't know what's nonsense about that. It is simply an elegant all-in-one solution with very good functionality, excellent software and a sound that probably no one can distinguish from more expensive devices in a blind test. Additionally, if the general message is "good enough" measured performance, where's the nonsense in that? Paying $949 for a device that can do everything you want and whose measurement results below the audibility threshold are worse than another that might be much less practical for someone? Question is, what is nonsense here.Yeah, who needs such nonsense devices when Denon 3800 (and probably 2800 too) does all the same but so much better + much much more for ~ the same price
Would be interesting to see that.I have a couple of their products to review and they did not impress, to say the least
I'll chime in and that comment is spot on. I bought three Nodes starting in 2017 and Roon Lifetime when I got tired screwing with my computer, Foobar and 1000+ CDs. At the time it was the only multi-room device next to Sonos, and Sonos was not Roon ready. Since that time other less expensive devices have caught up with the Bluesound systems. The highly functional BluOS system stagnates despite hundreds of feature requests by users for years on the website, many requests are simple updates that would keep up with competitors. The only thing I come up with for and explanation is that their settlement with Sonos limits what features they can change, because it seems like bad business to go on ignoring competition. It does work quite well in integrating rooms and outside services but is dated compared to others. To get flavor for ire of many who like their Bluesound stuff but want it updated read some of the comments here.To be fair, I think the Powernode (has there been multiple versions? Someone will chime in) has been around a while. But this review regardless shows the need for a refresh even if this "old" and certainly is this is a newer revision.
Interesting! My main system was long ESL63s with a NAD D3020. Good enough in a small room!I am the owner of a Powernode (last model). I used it to replace a nad D3020 (1st version) to drive a pair of KEF LS50 in a second setting. I am extremely happy with the sound and I would recommend this matching. My main rig is an all-QUAD with modded ESL63.
Did you try a putting a small screw into the broken jack and pulling it out? like the horrible way to remove a wine cork.And my 2013 macbook air. Except it has a broken 3.5mm jack inside that I can't get out.
unfortunately this might not help you,It is nice to have some hard evidence if I end up in another dispute about this. ;-)
Here you're essentially talking about the much more expensive NAD M10. The M10 V1 tested significantly better than the Powernode, but still isn't perfect by any means. IMO, the NAD C399 appears to be a better value (albeit in a full size case).A few years ago when this came out is was really the only viable solution beyond a raspberry pi for audiophile streaming. The market has now caught up and surpassed it technically so it's no longer price competitive. Hopefully the next iteration has a better dac section and updated higher quality and power hypex modules.
Ive tried a wood screw - possibly not thin enough. It wouldn't engage with the broken jackDid you try a putting a small screw into the broken jack and pulling it out? like the horrible way to remove a wine cork.
A better product, maybe, certainly more feature, but at 2899 a better "value"?
A better value than the even more expensive sibling M10, not a better value than the Powernode.A better product, maybe, certainly more feature, but at 2899 a better "value"?
Is this the original version from years ago? It's been upgraded a couple of times.I can't recommend the Bluesound Powernode streaming amplifier.
finding PEQ in general is hard, atleast for me.The lack of parametric EQ is a deal breaker.
BluOS devices have so many options, supported services and features but PEQ is too much to ask for?
I don't know. How can you tell? FYI I asked it to upgrade and it did so to the latest firmware.Is this the original version from years ago? It's been upgraded a couple of times.
Actually the ill-fated NAD D7050 measures better than these, but it was too early for an only-digital experience, and had serious reliability issues. And use a Squeezebox system and multi-room synched audio was a solved problem nearly 20 years ago.A better product, maybe, certainly more feature, but at 2899 a better "value"?