I can clearly see the goo creeping in from the left in the left opening:
I can clearly see the goo creeping in from the left in the left opening:
+1According to the measurements shown by @kyuu you should actually not go with the A7se but with the A7 (or A5) instead. The A7se may be be better than your AVR, but it's not ideal for a 3 ohm speaker!
The A5 and A7 are stable and capable of dumping a decent amount of current into even 2 ohm reactive loads.
The frequency response doesn't tell us anything about the sensitivity since it doesn't contain any info about the voltage used (and the mic distance if we want to be pedantic).
Yes, I know to whom you've been replying and now came to appreciate that you intended to be helpful to the OP.And btw I did reply to another's post who was also trying to answer the question about driving the F208's w/ the 3e audio amp.
Assuming that is the frequency response is the 2.83V response for sensitivity, you can see that there are only a few places where it hits 90 dB. I would eyeball the average sensitivity to be about 87.5 dB.Monoprice doesn't detail how they generate their measurements, at least as far as I'm aware, so whether or not they are "real" I do not know. But they do post measurements for at least some of their speakers, including the THX-460T:
Your math is way off. The 17 dB gain is added. If you feed a 4V source into a 17 dB gain amp with mid-to-high 80s sensitive speakers you will get just over 100 dB as max volume.I’m mainly interested in this amp because of its great performance, reasonable price and auto on/off functionality. With volume bypass this amp has a gain of 17 dB. In my situation, as I’m likely to sit within a meter of my speakers when at my desk, a 4 mVrms input, on a 17 dB gain coupled to 6 Ohm and 87.7 dB (1 W/ 1m) pair of speakers gives me 55.6 dB SPL for the auto on/off cutoff (two speakers against the wall).
I wasn’t talking about 4 Vrms, but 4 milli Vrms here. I was wondering at what SPL threshold the amp would turn off when using the balanced input, that’s where the 4 mVrms came from.Your math is way off. The 17 dB gain is added. If you feed a 4V source into a 17 dB gain amp with mid-to-high 80s sensitive speakers you will get just over 100 dB as max volume.
Absolutely correct. You're unlikely to recognise the difference.I should be able to mitigate this by just not using volume bypass and setting a lower volume on the 3e Audio A5(se), right? In this case I compensate for the lower effective gain of the amp by a higher output on the DAC and thus ensuring I can avoid unwanted auto standby, right?
This option would be less ideal, as the volume potentiometer isn’t perfect, but to be honest, unless the potentiometer is complete garbage, I don’t think would hear the difference in sound quality.
If the impedance of your 6 ohm really doesn't drip noticeably below 4 ohm this should be no problem.Also, I’m more interested in the A5se. The difference in price is better spend on improving the acoustics of my room and speaker setup. Also, the numbers used are more for illustrative purposes, I couldn’t actually find independent measurement data for the speakers I’m interested in.
Ah, got it, yeah, it would be great if the auto-on trigger was around 0.5 mV (18 dB lower). Always tough to set these as there are other situations where the auto-off never happens.I wasn’t talking about 4 Vrms, but 4 milli Vrms here. I was wondering at what SPL threshold the amp would turn off when using the balanced input, that’s where the 4 mVrms came from.
I’m looking into getting the Kanto Yu 5.25” Passives. I’m pretty limited in the space available for the speakers, so these seem like the best compromise for their price. I can’t find much data on them outside of the limited specs from the manufacturer. I don’t think this is the right thread to discuss my speaker choices though.Absolutely correct. You're unlikely to recognise the difference.
Ärchimago had published a worst case comparison (high gain RCA and volume pot set to -3 dB instead of XLR and bypass) and while there was a slight deterioration, the results were still impressive (and fully noise dominated at low levels).
![]()
Part II: 3e Audio - A5 Stereo and A7 Mono Class D + PFFB, TI TPA3251/3255 Amplifiers - power, distortion, and the subjective. (And a few photos for Swifties.)
A blog for audiophiles about more objective topics. Measurements of audio gear. Reasonable, realistic, no snakeoil assessment of sound, and equipment.archimago.blogspot.com
If the impedance of your 6 ohm really doesn't drip noticeably below 4 ohm this should be no problem.
What are your speakers? Maybe other members know about other sources or have performed measurements themselves?
You're welcome to come listen.I'm still wondering what listening conditions overload a 250+W amplifier with speakers that don't even dip below 3.4 Ohm. Would be nice to know.
This is a very clever goo XD I checked it again and it is indeed there, I have no idea how I didn't notice it while taking photos. Maybe because I was guided by the photo from Audiophonics, in which the goo clearly covers the empty opamp socket. If I opened the case there would be no doubts...
I'll be checking it out XDThat sure looks like goo...I sure hope that it doesn't spread and stays put ...
That was a misprint o the pre-production samples. Red is actually right.I've always considered red to mean right but here the RCA inputs are marked the other way:
View attachment 420633
No, they are newer developments specifically for these amplifiers.Are these ready made amps using the same DIY boards like 480-1-29A or 260-2-29A?
The boards are definitely different. Even the amp configuration is. AFAIR, the 260-2-29A uses a single TPA3255, whereas the A5 uses dual 3251Are these ready made amps using the same DIY boards like 480-1-29A or 260-2-29A?