• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Topping PA5 Review (Amplifier)

how loud will pa5 drive the hifiman susvara, the actual sensitivity is 79 db/ unknown 1 vrms or not
Here is the Susvara's sensitivity and efficiency as claimed by Hifiman and measured by 3rd parties:
Screenshot_20221005-124317_Sheets.png

The PA5 can output at least 26Vrms into 60Ω.
That's 92dB + 20*log10(26) = 120.3dB SPL , which is very loud.
 
Why would you want to use a PA5 speaker amp for 60Ω/84dB headphones?
For headphones, I suggest using a dedicated headphone amplifier.

many even use la90 to drive those planars, anyway, forget about the headphones. can you take a look at the la90 power supply, 64v/4a, so this la90 can't be using tpa3250/51? what's your opinion about the chip inside?

 
Why would you want to use a PA5 speaker amp for 60Ω/84dB headphones?
Most headphone amps just don't have enough power for certain planars. My Topping A30 Pro struggles a lot with my Aeon Noire and Susvaras need even more juice
 
how loud will pa5 drive the hifiman susvara, the actual sensitivity is 79 db/ unknown 1 vrms or not
You also need to know your distance from the speakers, and distance from speakers to nearby reflecting surfaces. Here is an online estimator: http://myhometheater.homestead.com/splcalculator.html Note the SPL chart lower on the page; 80 dB average is very loud to me, so I am quite content with being able to produce 100 dB SPL peaks at the listening position (20 dB headroom over louder than I am likely to listen).

HTH - Don
 
You also need to know your distance from the speakers, and distance from speakers to nearby reflecting surfaces. Here is an online estimator: http://myhometheater.homestead.com/splcalculator.html Note the SPL chart lower on the page; 80 dB average is very loud to me, so I am quite content with being able to produce 100 dB SPL peaks at the listening position (20 dB headroom over louder than I am likely to listen).

HTH - Don
Probably 1cm because it's a HEADPHONE
 
Oops... I did not read far enough, nor look up what a "hifiman susvara" is, duh. I also seem to have skipped the last page of the thread, the Wonders of Chrome. What I get for posting in the middle of running tests at 6 am (and I've been here a while already, long week). I don't drink coffee but maybe I should...

Thanks and sorry guys, hope I gave you a laugh - Don
 
Oops... I did not read far enough, nor look up what a "hifiman susvara" is, duh. I also seem to have skipped the last page of the thread, the Wonders of Chrome. What I get for posting in the middle of running tests at 6 am (and I've been here a while already, long week). I don't drink coffee but maybe I should...

Thanks and sorry guys, hope I gave you a laugh - Don
No problem. Susvara is a 6000 € planar headphone that's so inefficient that most people just use speaker amps to power them
 
Hi Amigos,

Just finished to mount the New Active PFC PSU A-DP 400. By testing it I made a great discovery, in any case it is observable at home!

I first set the A-DP 400 @ 40V / 10A, The PA5 simply refused to switch on, like it was going into protected mode
Then I gradually lowered the voltage, and @ 36V it starts ) This makes me say that the PA5 has a protection tuned by topping to avoid tweaking its nominal voltage.... I reproduced the scenario several times and I can therefore confirm this test with a multimeter measurement.

Now concerning the sound, I'm in the test phase and I'm going to listen to it with my Playlist at different volume levels, to see which of the two PSUs sounds better. As reminder :

Connex SMPS 300RS LLC @ 36V / 8,3A VS A-DP 400 Active PFC @ 36V / 11A

The Connex SMPS300RS use state of the art, very efficient LLC Series Resonant Converter Topology. Due to the soft-switched topology used, the SMPS300RS has very low EMI noise and also has a very low ripple.
The A-DP 400 has an active PFC controller for an high efficiency, PF value greater than 0.98, and its Output ripple is less than 150mV.

I mounted both PSUs with a DC blocker and good quality cables.





Hi Daniboun, could you list this exact DC filter used in PSU, and may be other components for whole assembly, please?
 
I live in a duplex where I rarely listen to speakers. I probably listen at moderate levels (5 watt max) maybe 3 hours a week at most.. are the issues mainly for people that put in 10+ hours a day at loud 20+ watt levels? Or is it just a lottery that 4 out of 10 of them have issues?

Note: I'd have the volume of the PA5 at max, but use a preamp plugged into it would be 5 watt max.
 
I live in a duplex where I rarely listen to speakers. I probably listen at moderate levels (5 watt max) maybe 3 hours a week at most.. are the issues mainly for people that put in 10+ hours a day at loud 20+ watt levels? Or is it just a lottery that 4 out of 10 of them have issues?

Note: I'd have the volume of the PA5 at max, but use a preamp plugged into it would be 5 watt max.
The product has a fault that apparently occurs with regularity.
 
Have you got some information to estimate statistics? "Regularity" means nothing. All products faults have got some regularity.
Oh come on... Anybody that's been around here regularly for several months or more knows what has occurred. Topping messed up some product somehow and they shipped it to customers for warranty processing.
 
So, after this https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...owners-only-please.33293/page-48#post-1350183
i took apart my pa5 and depotted that mystery module (it got pretty hot). didnt took as long as i expected. some heat gunning and careful prying and cleaning afterwards.

flir_20221017T143209.jpg
IMG_20221017_144650.jpg

So lets depot it, i got some experience in this from my last project
IMG_20221017_145310.jpgDSC02570 (Benutzerdefiniert).JPG


Its a 4 layer PCB...
even ripped off a ressitor as a bonus (which is weird since i didnt put a lot of force and my temp was below 260C. i think it had bad soldering from the factory. one of the possible failure points.)

it consist of
2 NE5532 (outputs are going (via resistors) to the output pins.)
DSC02572 (Benutzerdefiniert).JPG
and
2 OPA1612A (at the input)
DSC02571 (Benutzerdefiniert).JPG

The RC network on each side (top) has the PFFB lines going in and goes to the output pins directly
its literally this.. i didnt found a place where the legs of R3 went other than the reisistors nearby. no connection to the rest of the circuit.
XVIIx64_XgAqVYYbwC.png


those golden pogo pins are not connected to ground! neither the case has been its anodizing scraped off, its just a snap in retainer (theres small dents in the case) so the potting compoung can flow beneath.


So i put it all back together, obviously without the shielding to see if something is getting hot.
it works again... both channels at the same volume level. weird.
maybe micro degradation of one of those opamps, ne5532 is very reliable, not sure of that opa1612 tho.
or cracked solder joints due to the potting compound contracting/expanding over time.

IMG_20221017_161527.jpg

i should have used jumper wires instead, so i can take a thermal photo of the underside.
flir_20221017T161813.jpg


its running great again, sounds like before even without the metal can. lets see how long.
 
Last edited:
Thanks @gamerpaddy

i should have used jumper wires instead, so i can take a thermal photo of the underside.
View attachment 237622
I was thinking the same as soon as I saw two sides in this module.
Now, if it get hot on the underside too, it will be hard to cool it, unless you have enough space bellow, and place a copper plate in U shape, making a sandwich of this module, and then adding a heat sink on the top.
I already did it on a module like this, with chips on both sides but only the ones on the top had good contact with the heat sink. The other were too hot, and after making and placing this U form, it was perfect.
 
So, after this https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...owners-only-please.33293/page-48#post-1350183
i took apart my pa5 and depotted that mystery module (it got pretty hot). didnt took as long as i expected. some heat gunning and careful prying and cleaning afterwards.

View attachment 237611
View attachment 237612

So lets depot it, i got some experience in this from my last project
View attachment 237613View attachment 237615


Its a 4 layer PCB...
even ripped off a ressitor as a bonus (which is weird since i didnt put a lot of force and my temp was below 260C. i think it had bad soldering from the factory. one of the possible failure points.)

it consist of
2 NE5532 (outputs are going (via resistors) to the output pins.)
View attachment 237617
and
2 OPA1612A (at the input)
View attachment 237616

The RC network on each side (top) has the PFFB lines going in and goes to the output pins directly
its literally this.. i didnt found a place where the legs of R3 went other than the reisistors nearby. no connection to the rest of the circuit.
View attachment 237618


those golden pogo pins are not connected to ground! neither the case has been its anodizing scraped off, its just a snap in retainer (theres small dents in the case) so the potting compoung can flow beneath.


So i put it all back together, obviously without the shielding to see if something is getting hot.
it works again... both channels at the same volume level. weird.
maybe micro degradation of one of those opamps, ne5532 is very reliable, not sure of that opa1612 tho.
or cracked solder joints due to the potting compound contracting/expanding over time.

View attachment 237620

i should have used jumper wires instead, so i can take a thermal photo of the underside.
View attachment 237622


its running great again, sounds like before even without the metal can. lets see how long.
Excellent job. And makes it probable that the failure of any PA5 is a matter of time. For one PA5 this time will be longer, and in another the problem may appear much earlier.
Well, unless Topping decides to give a module with appropriate heat sinks in place of the covered box.
 
Back
Top Bottom