I'd wanted to get the fosi V3 stereo but have opted to wait for the version with PFFB.
I would agree, where it not for my own experience with the V3. I usually run a MiniDSP Flex into a Yamaha A-S1200, which certainly is a good device, into a pair of Wharfedale Linton 85th.
When i exchanged the Yamaha with a Fosi V3 i couldn't tell. I let it run for a few weeks and never once could tell the difference in terms of fidelity. Not when i play with my regular volume, not in "party" mode.
I went back to the A-S1200 because it looks awesome, has headphone out and two switchable speaker outputs, a remote and a proper standby circuit and all that stuff.
But for driving speakers, it doesn't matter ... TO ME. I know people claim to hear all sorts of things, but i can't. I never could. Not in the 90ies when people heard differneces in RCA cables, not in 2010s when people heard differences in Hires sources, not today when people hear differences in power supplies.
Will be interesting to compare Mono with the stereo version.
The PFFB version will likely look like the mono blocks in terms of measurements, with roughly half the power and less stable with two ohm loads.
Is channel separation that significant irl that monoblocks would have an advantage ? Or what would be significantly different about monoblocks?
The difference is you can put them apart (unless you buy their one powersupply with the Y-adapter) and you can buy an odd number of channels, say 3 or 5.
I personally would rather see them go the "more functionality" route instead of squeezing SINAD out of this very limited platform.