• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Topping PA3s Review (Desktop Amplifier)

Which Sure TA2024? According to Sure's AS32157 datasheet with a 12V psu it has 20dB gain and needs 662mV to reach its rated 15W into 4R at 10% distortion.
Sure TA2024 AA-AS32157, yes.
I made a test with a pink noise signal (left and right channel), and at 3 meters from each speaker I can get a SPL of 69 dB with the ta2024 (measured with JBLTools, and merely 60 dB with the PA3s. Volume maxed (amp and win)
 
Either one of the amps isn't behaving according to spec or it's human error - says a human that's made plenty of daft errors over the years. I'd double check signal levels at input and output of each amp to be sure which is misbehaving. A sine wave somewhere round 50Hz to 60Hz and a multimeter reading AC volts should do the trick - it's hard to know how high a frequency the AC readings will be accurate at, but they should always be good around mains frequency.
 
Thank you for the advice.
I played through the E30 DAC a 50 hz audio sample and I measured 0,42 V AC on each output channel.
I tried another DAC, a Cambridge DAC magic 100, the output with this 50 hz audio sample is slightly higher, at 0,46 V AC.

Then I measured the max V output on the PA3s : 2,5 V AC.
I measured the max V output on the ta2024, I obtain 5 V AC. Then I tried another ta2024 (from another company).. with same result, 5 V AC.

Maybe my PA3s is not ok...
 
The gain of the TA2024 is configurable. I wouldn't be surprised if your units had 25-26 dB gain, which is pretty common and would be in line with your voltage measurements. When you run you E30 full tilt with a 0 dB test signal, you are able to measure 2 volts?
 
The gain of the TA2024 is configurable. I wouldn't be surprised if your units had 25-26 dB gain, which is pretty common and would be in line with your voltage measurements. When you run you E30 full tilt with a 0 dB test signal, you are able to measure 2 volts?
no, I only found some audio samples @ -14dB
 
no, I only found some audio samples @ -14dB
Then the 0.42V is about right and your E30 is working.

What audio player are you using on your PC? Something with volume normalization may help bring the level up. In the past I have used Foobar2000 with ReplayGain and use Spotify with volume normalization.

Of course, it would be ideal if this amp had a more normal 25-29 dB gain so this wouldnt be required.
 
Then the 0.42V is about right and your E30 is working.

What audio player are you using on your PC? Something with volume normalization may help bring the level up. In the past I have used Foobar2000 with ReplayGain and use Spotify with volume normalization.

Of course, it would be ideal if this amp had a more normal 25-29 dB gain so this wouldnt be required.
Thank you Paul. I use Foobar2000, and sometimes VLC. I will give ReplayGain a try ;-)
 
Hello,
I am looking for a desktop audio solution and want the minimum power consumption when the amplifier is idle.
So far I have used my Av Yamaha RX but it consumes 60W without sound and I am looking at more efficient options.
What do you consume without sound or at low volume?
It would be paired with kef Q150 and for now with a cheap FX-AUDIO DAC-X6 dac.
What dac do you recommend with subwoofer output? Thanks!!
 
Would the PA3s be a better amp for my front L/R than the built in amp in my Marantz NR1509 AVR? I want to keep the AVR for center channel, bass management/sub out, and phono input, but want better power for my front L/R. Or do I need to step up to the Topping PA5 to be better than the Marantz?

 
Would the PA3s be a better amp for my front L/R than the built in amp in my Marantz NR1509 AVR? I want to keep the AVR for center channel, bass management/sub out, and phono input, but want better power for my front L/R. Or do I need to step up to the Topping PA5 to be better than the Marantz?

I got the 1608, but it doesn't really matter for answering the question.
I don't think you would profit, really. To "audibly double" the maximum volume, you actually need 10 times more power - here's an explanation:
What may help more: sit closer to the speakers, or buy more efficient speakers.
 
I got the 1608, but it doesn't really matter for answering the question.
I don't think you would profit, really. To "audibly double" the maximum volume, you actually need 10 times more power - here's an explanation:
I was thinking better/cleaner/less distorted power not necessarily more power.
 
OK, but even then, not much, I'm afraid. You will understand why after reading the link. And, if you have audible distortion, the culprit are almost always the speakers, or amp clipping, which you can rather exclude with the Marantz' protection. An average solid-state amp should have well below 1% THD before clipping, while "stressed" speakers will produce 10-15 times more. Which front speakers are you driving with your Marantz?
 
Would the PA3s be a better amp for my front L/R than the built in amp in my Marantz NR1509 AVR? I want to keep the AVR for center channel, bass management/sub out, and phono input, but want better power for my front L/R. Or do I need to step up to the Topping PA5 to be better than the Marantz?

In the 'for what its worth' dept: For fun, I hooked it up to my Focal Aria 936 K2s (8-ohm, 92 db sensitivity. rated for 50-300W)), and it drove them to power my 20x25x11 listening room to 76dB SPL at 3-4m away. Above that, it cut off. It powers my ML Motion 12s (4-ohm, 92 dB sensitivity) in my bedroom TV system to very adequate levels, and I'm pleased by the transparency and huge bass capability (for its size). It also powered my Polk Signature S20 bookshelves in my office VERY well--to higher than average listening levels. If you want a rocking out SPL I'd get something with more power. I'm confident it could drive most reasonably sensitive bookshelves to 85 dB SPL in most sm-med rooms. At no time has it exhibited any noticeable distortion. You might find this little calculator helpful. https://www.crownaudio.com/en-US/tools/calculators#amp_power_required
 
I was thinking better/cleaner/less distorted power ...
Do you hear any distortion in the sound now?
If you can't hear, how will you know that the other amplifier has less distortion?
It is better to improve the speakers because they are always the weakest link in the chain.
 
OK, but even then, not much, I'm afraid. You will understand why after reading the link. And, if you have audible distortion, the culprit are almost the speakers. An average solid-state amp should have well below 1% THD before clipping, while "stressed" speakers will produce 10-15 times more. Which front speakers are you driving with your Marantz?
Currently auditioning a pair of Elac Debut Reference DBR62 and a pair of Alexis Sound Rebecca (precursor to the Philharmonic monitors designed by Dennis Murphy). Also considering an active vs passive desktop setup down the line, which the PA3s could do double duty on if it's "not worth it" to use as a power amp out of the Marantz pre-out
 
I don't know these speakers, sorry... But as said, unless the amp is broken, it's IMHO probably not the amp.
 
Hello,
I am looking for a desktop audio solution and want the minimum power consumption when the amplifier is idle.
So far I have used my Av Yamaha RX but it consumes 60W without sound and I am looking at more efficient options.
What do you consume without sound or at low volume?
It would be paired with kef Q150 and for now with a cheap FX-AUDIO DAC-X6 dac.
What dac do you recommend with subwoofer output? Thanks!!
I used my PC based Soundblaster AE-7 with included "Command" DSP software, and it enables configuring a great 2.1 system driving my Topping PA3s, with Polk S20 Signature bookshelves and Infinity sub. Very nice chipset, and I can't hear any veiling or low-level distortion. Great little office system.
 
Has anyone compared this to either the SMSL AO 200 or DA9 ... be really interested to hear your thoughts if you have especially on the output / power.
 
Has anyone compared this to either the SMSL AO 200 or DA9 ... be really interested to hear your thoughts if you have especially on the output / power.
I have purchased and compared the AO200 with the DA-9, PA3s, PA5, A20a, A8. However, DA-9, A20a, and A8 are not currently used due to technical problems with their products.
The AO200, DA-9, and A20a have preset EQs and tone controls, but without them I wouldn't feel any audible difference with the PA3. The IC chip used is the same and the actual output power does not change.
The choice of PA3s depends on whether you need preset EQ and tone control. I use the AO200 most often on my system.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom