Another big name bites dust.
Based on a review of one of their lowest priced models?
Another big name bites dust.
Same response times three. I hope Paul wasn't in the NRC chamber when they measured it:
I almost wrote that in the review. At this rate, I won't have single industry friend left! Already lost a bunch.Ouch. Amir is going to need some donations so he can travel and make new friends...this site has to be brutally on relationships...
Of course at some point someone will have to buy you out haha (business acquisition I mean)I almost wrote that in the review. At this rate, I won't have single industry friend left! Already lost a bunch.
I am super interested in testing a Paradigm. Let me see if I can find something reasonable from them.....After Amir's slaying of the old school British brands, onto the Canadians. next should be a Paradigm. I once heard a Paradigm Studio and it also tore my ears off with it's brightness.
I am super interested in testing a Paradigm. Let me see if I can find something reasonable from them.....
Noob question here. Could anyone explain me a bit about "Directivity"?
How could we know there's error in the graph? What is it and how it affect the sound?
You know, at some level it looks similar to this PSB! I wonder if they think this sells and are copying each other.This is how bad their $7k standmounters are (Persona B). I still don't understand why anyone buys Paradigm. Listening window graph below. Full set at https://www.soundstagenetwork.com/i...&catid=77:loudspeaker-measurements&Itemid=153
I almost wrote that in the review. At this rate, I won't have single industry friend left! Already lost a bunch.
Yes, just eye balling the spin data I would never have guessed a score so high. Not that it is high, but it is higher than I thought it would get by a good bit. Maybe the score thing is just a bad idea.
I believe the stereophile window is +/- 15 degrees (a 30 degree window meaning 30 degrees total)Here is my attempt to do the same +/- 30-degree response Stereophile uses, at 300Hz and up:
View attachment 76981
I've been wondering about the same thing. When Amir reviewed my Pioneer BS22 mod, the first thing I happened onto was the waterfall plot, which seemed to show a crater-like dip in the lower treble. I was sure the panther was going to be in several pieces, but when I scrolled up to where I should have been, he was wielding a golf club.Why is there so much variation in the aspect ratio of the contour maps with each review? It seems to me like they should always be identical, both in terms of aspect ratio and in terms of resolution.
This one is 1.19(911 x 762), the Salk WOW1 was 1.9(870x457). But every review is a bit different, despite always covering the same frequency range and angles. The way they are right now, to compare them side by side you HAVE to resize the images first otherwise it's very easy to draw mistaken conclusions.
Thanks review and clean up the mess Amir, despite it was a depressing day a big hurrah for that Klippel analyzer.....The speaker in question won streophile product of the year award in 2019.....
Those are the ones I have lost actually. They barely return my emails if at all. All other requests such as samples to measure have been turned down.You probably still have some in Northridge, CA.
Maybe this is one of those situations where the unevenness of the FR actually causes you to hear the music in a new and different way.The heck? Speaker of the year 2019? How?