Thank you for agreeing with me.
Rick “who has said twice it’s not Amir’s job, but somebody should do it” Denney
Agree with your original post about the practice of asking for comment before publishing about a result with an unclear explanation. Regarding the other poster, Amir is definitely not a journalist, but it's also rather disingenuous to say he is only a "tester." While ASR doesn't seem to have a mission statement posted anywhere (please correct me), I think it's common knowledge that most of the forum members consider ASR as some catalyst for change in the industry. More importantly, Amir has remarked on this subject of seeing some companies or products improve as a result of his work.
ASR is obviously more important than just a repository of measurements. As such, it bears greater responsibility as well--especially if it wants to be more impactful in its mission. A previous moderator once mentioned that many more non-members come to ASR, look at the reviews, and don't engage in the forum. To the online public, ASR is primarily a blog of product reviews (just look at the format of the homepage).
IMO, ASR's closest "competitors" are blog-style tech review sites and social media influencers (this includes Youtube, in which ASR now has a direct presence). Again, this is just my opinion, but I strongly believe that only small percentage of the total relevant web audience (ASR + "competitors", etc.) finds ASR more credible than its competitors. I think it typically takes a person with a science, engineering, or studio background to begin to appreciate what ASR is doing and how ASR is doing it.
The vast majority of the audience on the web places more credibility and trust in factors they've spent a lifetime evaluating and inherently understand: production value, visuals and graphics, copy editing, and counter-intuitively, the presence of familiar ads. If you're someone that thinks FFT is video game about space travel, you're much more likely to be swayed by the production value of a Darko Youtube review.