I think "REVIEW" just looks closer to the knob because the knob is shown at an angle (emulating 3D)?
(or am I wrong? - is the knob represented as a white cylinder with a black circle trimming the front?)
Like the upper right one.
I think "REVIEW" just looks closer to the knob because the knob is shown at an angle (emulating 3D)?
(or am I wrong? - is the knob represented as a white cylinder with a black circle trimming the front?)
Like the upper right one.
Still like those featuring an up hill roll like Prometheus as that seems what this forum is about.
It’s fine in combination with that blue arc. It’s not without it.
Seems, I lost the track somewhere ... Why is this unbalanced representation of the three naming terms?
View attachment 349420
You are correct. My teachers would be unhappy with me mixing them up. I remembered they were tormented for their deeds, just had the two mixed up.The guy was Sisyphus, not to be confused with Syphilis The story of Prometheus fits better (he brought the fire). Sisyphus was punished to an eternity of useless effort and unending frustration (rolling the boulder up a hill). Don't know how Amir feels
My interpretation was the main points are Audio and Science. Review is of lesser ethos. Plus two biggies show up better on small phone screens.Seems, I lost the track somewhere ... Why is this unbalanced representation of the three naming terms?
View attachment 349420
Plus two biggies show up better on small phone screens.
@Chagall The bottom left one looks great! Lovely visual balance, and the dots connect the text nicely. Possibly could do with a little more work on the precise splines of the curves? Jony Ive is famous for obsessing over curves. They look quite parabolic right now, maybe go for something a little more catenary to fill the space in the middle subtly more? Or a tiny overlap at the edge instead of the tiny gap?
Working back from that as the primary design to inform the alternates should give a very good result. The single letters in the "mobile" versions don't add much - personally I'd drop them and the dots for anything other than the primary logo.
That’s true – but to me, REVIEW looks underrepresented and underrated here. While the website has it with prominent importance:
View attachment 349425
Oh, I see now - it's a highlight from the upper left - I thought maybe the knob was shown at a very slight oblique angleChagall’s original (left) has the REVIEW seemingly a bit too far off the centre. In my version (right) I tried to demonstrate how it might look instead:
View attachment 349411
Surprisingly I don't mind this one and isn't making me think of Chrome actually;Whatever I do with them overlapping, it just looks like a Chrome icon...
This white/blue one is my favorite so far, except (there's always an exception, right?) I prefer the upper grid to be rectlinear, rather than a net.