Do you use the high pass crossover in the plate sub amp for each of the mains or an external crossover?
external. Minidsp 8 channel with Dirac
Do you use the high pass crossover in the plate sub amp for each of the mains or an external crossover?
You mentioned dedicated stereo subwoofers and I couldn't help but link this Audioholics article about the compromises inherent in stereo subs - I thought it was very well researched: https://www.audioholics.com/room-acoustics/stereo-bassI have been following this thread as I am looking to add Atmos to my theater.
My system is currently 7.1, but rather odd: I take an HDMI signal, convert it to SDI with an SDI02, that conveniently strips HDCP. From SDI, I can extract four sets of two channel AES/EBU digital audio at up to 24 bit, 48 kHz sampling rate. With this, I can run through a MiniDSP DDRC-88D (or a pair of nanoAVRs prior to conversion to SDI), and then the DAC and speakers of my choice.
Right now I am using a 0.005% THD Symmetrix Lucid DAC8 Dac (85 dB SINAD), and a set of Crown (75 dB SINAD) and Outlaw audio amps. Despite the poor numbers, it sounds amazing. But, the more important thing is that I can substitute any DAC (and amps) that I want. A unified preamp/processor without digital outputs (The Storm 32d.32 AES edition has them, with Dirac Live, at an eye-watering US$16k or so) limits me to whatever SINAD I can get out of it's DACs (and associated circuitry). The Monoprice HTP-1 with better than 100 dB SINAD at 2 Volts for $4000 is a steal compared to anything else. It truely is an example of engineering being the Art of Compromise.
Would I love to have seen great figures at 4V? Sure. Are commensurate amps that insensitive? No. Can you drive them to full power with the output of the HTP-1 without going into excessive distortion? Yes. Thermal noise justifying a high level signal starts to matter when you seek to reach 110 to 120 dB SINAD.
Comparing a pre/pro like the Emotiva RMC-1, with slightly better measurements, but continued bugginess is a no brainer: the HTP-1 wins on stability without giving up too much in the way of performance (and adds in the way of functionality with eARC). Can we do better? If I seek to continue my design with an alternate 7.1 non-Atmos path, I'm left going to Okto DAC 8s (US$1200) and some type of switch ($1000 will get you a Broadcast Devices 8 channel relay switch, with about 105-110 dB noise (from control components)). But while the Okto DAC8 beats this, if you want a convenient switch between 7.1 and Atmos, you're now paying $2000 extra (plus the cost of existing processing nanoAVRs or a DDRC-88D and SDI to AES deembedders, at $1500 to $2000) FOR THE SAME QUALITY YOU'RE ALREADY GETTING OUT OF THE HTP-1 with a lot more complexity. You can have 7.1 118 dB SINAD if you don't want to switch between that and Atmos, but the minute you do, the switch will trip you up. So, you consider eliminating a mechanical switch and, damn it, brute-forcing ADCing the output of the HTP-1, switching digitally, and then running everything, except perhaps Atmos height signals, through something like Okto DACs. Actually, a Lynx Aurora 8 would be up to the job, being about as good as the HTP-1, and can be had for around $700 used. You still need the DAC (As the Aurora is about as good as the HTP-1 on the ADC/DAC sides), so $1200 there. You can't win unless you get something like a Storm Audio pre/pro, the 32 channel AES upgrade package (because it's DACs are WORSE than those in the HTP-1) AND a decent DAC like an Octo DAC8. You're looking in the neighborhood of US$17k.
So, from my perspective, the Monoprice HTP-1 is the best value for dollar. Doing better will require you to either give up stability (Emotiva), or spend at least four times as much (Storm Audio). I am not willing to pay around $1000/dB for 12 dB better SINAD figures. Your mileage may vary, but I think an HTP-1 is in my future.
One very nice feature the Storm Audio pre/pro has, that I wish the HTP-1 did, is the ability to run multiple active left, center, and right speakers. This is useful if you want to have dedicated stereo subwoofers just for the left and right channels, crossed over a bit higher than 80 Hz (say 120), so they are localizable. One can use the subwoofer high-pass outputs, of course, but it is not clear how good their quality is. (I'm looking at you: Rythmic XLR2 plate amp.)
An interesting article, thanks.You mentioned dedicated stereo subwoofers and I couldn't help but link this Audioholics article about the compromises inherent in stereo subs - I thought it was very well researched: https://www.audioholics.com/room-acoustics/stereo-bass
The speaker includes software-selectable +4 dBU Input sensitivity for connection of high-output professional equipment and -10 dBV input sensitivity that provides additional gain for products with consumer-level signal output.
+4 dBu is about 2V, just above the low distortion limit of the preamp. I would select -10 dBV for short interconnect runs and only select the higher lever for ling ines if nouse is an issue. Set the output level on tbe HTP-1 appropriately. Honestly, at 2V you are probably fine at the higher level. I would not go higher on the preamp as it distorts badly above that.
2 volts is about +8.23dB (ref .775V) - +4 is as you said 1.228V.Thanks. My XLR cables are 50' runs, so pretty long. Not sure why this didn't occur to me earlier, but I found an online converter and it says the following:
The home recording level (consumer audio) of −10 dBV means 0.3162 volts, that is −7.78 dBu.
The studio recording level (pro audio) of +4 dBu means a voltage of 1.228 volts.
http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-db-volt.htm
So if I set my speakers to +4 dBu and the HTP-1 at 2 volts, amps in the speakers are going to clip?
+4 dBu is about 2V, just above the low distortion limit of the preamp. I would select -10 dBV for short interconnect runs and only select the higher lever for ling ines if nouse is an issue. Set the output level on tbe HTP-1 appropriately. Honestly, at 2V you are probably fine at the higher level. I would not go higher on the preamp as it distorts badly above that.
Distortion generally rises with output level as does signal to noise. So, you want the highest output level to not overload the amp that does not distort. This may be limited by your amp if it does not have a variable input attenuator. You might have to suffer a bit of S/N degradation to not overload your amp. But really, the difference between 1.228V and 3V is only 7.76 dB.How should one interpret the numbers? Looking at SINAD it would seem that even at 2.7V output it has 103dB SINAD but looking at the THD+N it looks worse. Why is that and looking at the SINAD only it would seem that closer to 3V out would be acceptable.
Distortion generally rises with output level as does signal to noise. So, you want the highest output level to not overload the amp that does not distort. This may be limited by your amp if it does not have a variable input attenuator. You might have to suffer a bit of S/N degradation to not overload your amp. But really, the difference between 1.228V and 3V is only 7.76 dB.
Does Dirac reduce main L/R trim levels? It shouldn't if your other channels are gain/level matched correctly.What I've found a bit tricky with the HTP-1 is that after Dirac has been run and all speaker levels have been set you pretty much have to go to over 0dB on the main volume control to reach reference levels. For instance the nc400 monoblocks should produce 400W (4Ohm) at 2.2V but setting the output level of the HTP-1 to 2.2V and with a volume of 0dB I am no where near reference levels and I assume no where near 2.2V since in theory 400W would give me way past reference levels.
Seeing that there seemed to be an issue with going over 0dB on the volume control I've resorted to using 2.9V(I choose this because it seems to be the max input for nc400 where 2.2V is max RMS...not sure what that means tbh but I take it 2.9 is for max burst) which I still think doesn't give me reference levels at 0dB on MV but loud enough for even most soft content. Very tricky to know exactly what voltage it's sending out at 0dB on the main volume control.
I can however set it to 2.2V output level and then go beyond 0dB on the volume control and get reference levels but as I understand it is not recommended to go beyond 0dB on MV.
It's RMS.If the sensitivity on the amp is 2.2V RMS that is going to be 2.2 * sqrt(2) or 3.11V peak. Is it possible the output level on the HPT-1 is peak and not RMS?
What I've found a bit tricky with the HTP-1 is that after Dirac has been run and all speaker levels have been set you pretty much have to go to over 0dB on the main volume control to reach reference levels. For instance the nc400 monoblocks should produce 400W (4Ohm) at 2.2V but setting the output level of the HTP-1 to 2.2V and with a volume of 0dB I am no where near reference levels and I assume no where near 2.2V since in theory 400W would give me way past reference levels.
Seeing that there seemed to be an issue with going over 0dB on the volume control I've resorted to using 2.9V(I choose this because it seems to be the max input for nc400 where 2.2V is max RMS...not sure what that means tbh but I take it 2.9 is for max burst) which I still think doesn't give me reference levels at 0dB on MV but loud enough for even most soft content. Very tricky to know exactly what voltage it's sending out at 0dB on the main volume control.
I can however set it to 2.2V output level and then go beyond 0dB on the volume control and get reference levels but as I understand it is not recommended to go beyond 0dB on MV.
Does Dirac reduce main L/R trim levels? It shouldn't if your other channels are gain/level matched correctly.
Are you connecting to the amp balanced or unbalanced? You would need to double the voltage setting in the HTP-1 for unbalanced.