• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

KEF R8 Meta Dolby Atmos Speaker Review

Rate this Dolby Atmos Speaker

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 3 1.6%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 20 10.9%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 76 41.3%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 85 46.2%

  • Total voters
    184

sifi36

Active Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2021
Messages
119
Likes
238
€ 1600 was the price of the 'old' R3.
R3 Meta costs €2200 / pair VAT included.



My comment was in relation to the R8 Meta, the subject of this thread.
 

tktran303

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
683
Likes
1,178
I suspect that the interface where the the cone’s edge meets the rubber surround is responsible for dip seen around 1.5KHz.

It is a common issue that affects many mid-woofers with big roll surround, Eg. LS50 loudspeaker. It is anisotropic, so with DSP you can improve it somewhat but you can’t fully massage this out, because it exhibits different characteristics at different directions.

The midrange specific driver eg. Coaxial from the R3 Meta has a smaller surround with a different profile optimised to be free of this. The downside is that as low as 100Hz ( as the midwoofer ). Which is why all the other models have a dedicated midwoofer.

So it’s an engineering trade off.

@amirm I’m 110% certain that it is NOT a Dolby requirement. Are you using AI to assist with writing this article?

I wonder if a CTA2034A measurement is a value measurement for this type of “pop on top of another” type speaker…

As a surround based speaker sitting atop a front speaker, it would be very interesting to see what the measurement as the typical listening position may be…
 
Last edited:

3125b

Major Contributor
Joined
May 18, 2020
Messages
1,352
Likes
2,204
Location
Germany
That directivity really is something to behold.
Prices will come down quite significantly I expect, the first gen R-series sold for around half the MSRP for the longest time.
 

juliangst

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 11, 2021
Messages
957
Likes
978
Location
Germany
Is it really necessary to have atmos/ceiling speakers for over 3000€ (for 4 of them)?

Wouldn’t something like JBL Control One for 200€/4pcs be enough for atmos applications?
 

tktran303

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
683
Likes
1,178
Is anything really “necessary”

It’s the marketplace…

But from what I can see, there’s really nothing to complain about in terms of performance. The engineers have to their target IHMO.
 

Jukebox

Active Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2020
Messages
192
Likes
346
I'm sure that dip isn't there by accident or is an oversight. Maybe @jackocleebrown can explain why its there?
He already did 2 months ago in the Kef R Meta Series Release topic:
"Just to make you aware, the R8 META is a certified by Dolby for use as an Atmos Upward-Firing Speaker. It's designed to hit strict frequency response and directivity targets specified by Dolby so it works optimally in this situation. Keep this in mind when looking at objective data as they're not the same targets we use for our other loudspeakers."
 

Jon AA

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 5, 2020
Messages
465
Likes
905
Location
Seattle Area
If someone has seen the Dolby OEM requirements for the crossover, please post so we can confirm.
Here is what the Dolby specified crossover looks like for the up-firing speakers:

AtmosElevationCrossover2.png


It replicates the HRTF for making things sound as if they are coming from above you. If used for upfiring, this would need to be added with EQ (this is Audyssey MQX).

Personally, I would highly recommend that people don't do that. This is a fantastic speaker that would be easily mountable on your front and rear walls as height speakers (no goofy EQ needed, better positioning and much better sound).
 

Attachments

  • AtmosElevationCrossover.png
    AtmosElevationCrossover.png
    234.9 KB · Views: 87

rvsixer

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Apr 6, 2018
Messages
605
Likes
409
Location
Somewhere at the base of the Rockies....
I am still surprised with Atmos being so prevalent for so long, there is still so much mystery around speaker requirements (and proper placement as well):
Sections 2.5.x. - 2.8.x
In addition, the Dolby Audio Room Design Tool mentioned therein, makes it easy to find the required speaker capability(s) for an individual room.

In short Dolby Atmos overhead speaker specification is they are to be full range or bass managed, have 17dB above reference output capability, be within +/- 3dB from 40-18Khz, and have wide dispersion. Whether or not mixers actually take advantage of these capabilities is up to them, but be aware if you go "cheap" on the overheads, you are leaving lots of performance on the table if they do.

I am surprised at the midrange dip seemingly built into this speaker. KEF seems to be the type of company that would not let this out the door, I do hope an explanation or corrective action is coming.

In regards to upfiring Atmos speakers...I simply fail to see how those can create the phantoms necessary for proper spatial placement.
 
Last edited:

Vacceo

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 9, 2022
Messages
2,627
Likes
2,748
I am still surprised with Atmos being so prevalent for so long, there is still so much mystery around speaker requirements (and proper placement as well):
Sections 2.5.x.
In addition, the Dolby Audio Room Design Tool mentioned therein, makes it easy to find the required speaker capability(s) for an individual room.

In short Dolby Atmos overhead speaker specification is they are to be full range or bass managed, have 17dB above reference output capability, be within +/- 3dB from 40-18Khz, and have wide dispersion. Whether or not mixers actually take advantage of these capabilities is up to them, but be aware if you go "cheap" on the overheads, you are leaving lots of performance on the table if they do.

I am surprised at the midrange dip seemingly built into this speaker. KEF seems to be the type of company that would not let this out the door, I do hope an explanation or corrective action is coming.

In regards to upfiring Atmos speakers...I simply fail to see how those can create the phantoms necessary for proper spatial placement.
Considering the frequency range, very few overhead or height speakers can reach 40 Hz by themselves. I actually wonder if that is even necessary having subwoofers.
 

rvsixer

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Apr 6, 2018
Messages
605
Likes
409
Location
Somewhere at the base of the Rockies....
Considering the frequency range, very few overhead or height speakers can reach 40 Hz by themselves. I actually wonder if that is even necessary having subwoofers.
Bass managed is part of the mentioned spec (i.e. use of subwoofer to extend the LF capability of the speakers if necessary).
 
Last edited:

JohnnyNG

Active Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2019
Messages
177
Likes
184
I believe an "Atmos-enabled" speaker like this is high-passed at ~150Hz in the AVR. It is crossed over to the (presumably much larger) speaker it is sitting on, though, not directly to the sub so directionality is not an issue.
 

thewas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
6,731
Likes
16,157
I suspect that the interface where the the cone’s edge meets the rubber surround is responsible for dip seen around 1.5KHz.

It is a common issue that affects many mid-woofers with big roll surround, Eg. LS50 loudspeaker. It is anisotropic, so with DSP you can improve it somewhat but you can’t fully massage this out, because it exhibits different characteristics at different directions.

The midrange specific driver eg. Coaxial from the R3 Meta has a smaller surround with a different profile optimised to be free of this. The downside is that as low as 100Hz ( as the midwoofer ). Which is why all the other models have a dedicated midwoofer.

So it’s an engineering trade off.
Neither the original LS50 nor LS50 Meta or other recent 2-way Uni-Qs have such a wide and deep dip there, so I am sure its a conscious tuning choice from KEF, would be interesting to know the reasons.
 

LiviuTM

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 16, 2021
Messages
29
Likes
53
Location
Romania
Does anybody know what's the difference, if any, between R8 Meta and R8a Meta?
 

Chilli

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2018
Messages
72
Likes
65
Location
Hamilton, NZ
What an interesting speaker. Thanks for taking the time to align it for measurement. These do seem more effort. I wondered on the usefulness and application, but looking at the results makes me more interested in Dolby atmos than before, so kudos to Kef.
maybe the suck out above 1k is to limit midrange interference with other speakers in the room. Esp centre speaker. Afterall, these are effects speakers mainly. I guess we shall see. Would have thought this would be taken care of in the object-based spatial dsp stuff, rather than the speaker though.
We are all now curious to how the other meta speakers might measure like after seeing the dispersion on this. Hella pricey, though.
As mentioned above, are we looking for this in a good atmos speaker, or one that beams. I guess that depends how big the room and where people are sitting.
 

Jimbob54

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
11,063
Likes
14,694
Does anybody know what's the difference, if any, between R8 Meta and R8a Meta?
I think the R8a (dont think there is/was an R8a Meta) was the previous (non meta) incarnation judging by Kef's site- shows as a lot cheaper and sold out.
 

RichB

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
May 24, 2019
Messages
1,946
Likes
2,611
Location
Massachusetts
These speakers are clearly well designed.
However, there are obvious issues with this bouncy sound.

Placed on-top of a speaker they can interfere with each other.

There has to be loss for distance to the ceiling and loss for bouncing.
I don't think 6 dB is out of the question, so this speaker needs (at least IMO), 4x the power handling, not tested here.

It is reasonable to measure speakers, but up firing speakers are in the snake oil category.

Dolby Atmos is a marketing machine with very little regard to implementation.
For $$ you get the Atmos label. This cannot be argued as my ThinkPad has the Atmos logo, clearly ridiculous.

If mounted to aim at the listener, I'd give them a fine/good.
If mounted to bounce, then the wide dispersion is a negative. I'd give them poor because the concept is bad.
Bouncy sound for Atmos is where the product becomes all marketing and deserves to be called Crapmos. :p

- Rich
 
Last edited:

FrantzM

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 12, 2016
Messages
4,335
Likes
7,719
Hi.

When a non-essential speaker measures that well, it bodes well for the other in the lineup!. Congrats.
And now to You! :mad: Kef management/people , who are reading this forum ....
Please send the R3, R5 and R11 Meta versions, for review.. Please. Yes! You, Kef People! Your engineering is as good as they get, and it seems that your speakers are exemplary, but .. come on! send some. One from time to time, not your subwoofers, this segment is covered at lesser cost by other companies :p. Or are your subwoofers that good too? Nah!! :D

Peace
 

HarmonicTHD

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 18, 2022
Messages
3,326
Likes
4,829
Excellent driver obviously (as we see also in other KEF products), not sure though if that ceiling reflection thing really works for height channels. Does anyone has some data on that?
 
Top Bottom