eddantes
Addicted to Fun and Learning
- Joined
- May 15, 2020
- Messages
- 823
- Likes
- 1,719
Just identifying that objective data suggests that one can get most of the qualities (if not more) of the R series in the new Q Metas with significant savings. Not having been involved in a DBT of these speakers, that is all we can do. Also, it would not be the first time that a company produces a more inexpensive product that canibalizes sales of their premium offering, just because something is more expensive doesn't necessarily mean it's better - even from the same brand.I feel like I'm missing something...
Three different people are pushing for the Q series while I've expressed a somewhat clear indication that I'm interested in the R series.
Could you elaborate on reasons why? Do you think they're going to offer the same quality? By reading around it seemed to me that the tonality is not the only thing that matters, there are other indicators from other measurements.
Or is Kef sticking to scientific measurements for speaker design but then tries to sell the R series as added snake oil when compared to the Q series.
Help me understand your point of view. I don't want to waste money. But I'd like to get the best I can for the budget I have. Thanks.
If you have the means - go with the Rs. At the very least you will forgo the FOMO brain worm that may set in.