For example:
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...dale-diamond-220-budget-speaker-review.16752/
Just saying..![]()
Starting roll-off in bass at 200Hz? Competend? At least there is a lot of room for arguing.
For example:
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...dale-diamond-220-budget-speaker-review.16752/
Just saying..![]()
IMO that's a good thing actually! Too many hifi speakers are not designed to sit close to the front wall.Starting roll-off in bass at 200Hz? Competend? At least there is a lot of room for arguing.
That's a good point!Actually, I think reviews like this are some of the most important... speakers that are praised/recommended without any measurments to back those recommendations. Now people know at least when researching they will probably run into this review and think twice and maybe buy something better.
IMO that's a good thing actually! Too many hifi speakers are not designed to sit close to the front wall.
IMO that's a good thing actually! Too many hifi speakers are not designed to sit close to the front wall.
Not everyone buying his first hifi system wants to spend for an AVR with ARC if his speakers cost so little..Does it matter though? Home Theater means bass management is included. With that in mind you're just getting cheated out of bass output.
Not everyone buying his first hifi system wants to spend for an AVR with ARC if his speakers cost so little..
Anyway I agree with you, 'cause I use an AVR as well..
Don't do that Average Joe!Denon's 5.1 AVRs can be bought for 500$ or so. Even cheaper used.
I would even argue that the majority of Average Joes are more likely to own an AVR than a 'Hi-Fi' Amplifier.
He said tone controlsDon't do that Average Joe!Hey...Spend the most of your money for speakers and buy a cheap amp with tone controls.
Yeah, please let me elaborate:He said tone controls![]()
May be a good theory. Could be just cheap, boutique (like this or Chane), and never reliably measured. Then people claim they're great and it takes a lot of effort to remove the mystery.Interesting theory. We should test a few more darlings of home theater budget crowd to see if the characteristic is common to all.
Your point being that this competent Wharfedale design suggests other Wharfedale products would be competent. You still have no way of knowing the competency of an untested brand before testing. I find this information quite valuable to help filter out the noise of options in this budget range.For example:
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...dale-diamond-220-budget-speaker-review.16752/
Just saying..![]()
It didn't hurt the Elac DBR-62 too much or the Kali IN-8v2 (does that count as a slot port?).I'm losing track now. How many speakers have been done in my front-mounted slotted ports? I think there's a message here.
At least we can see that it at least should be flared.It didn't hurt the Elac DBR-62 too much or the Kali IN-8v2 (does that count as a slot port?).
Actually, the main issue with the Elac DBR-62 was a port resonance at 600 Hz.It didn't hurt the Elac DBR-62 too much or the Kali IN-8v2 (does that count as a slot port?).
I felt inside and it seems to be an enclosed space which then ports up somewhere deeper than my hand reaches. Just feeling for the air, vast majority of it comes out the center area of the port. The sides don't seem to be doing much. I will see if I can open it and take a better look.Also, this HTD is a transmission line, not just a simple port opening. @amirm , if you can get into the speaker (maybe screw off the terminal plate), a look inside the speaker to see the transmission line would be cool.
I doubt it is a transmission line design. If it was it would have 12dB/octave bass roll-off. This looks more like 24dB/octave, which is a vented box response. The impedance response also points to a vented design.Also, this HTD is a transmission line, not just a simple port opening.