No. The test Erin has setup is not the way NFS should be used for actual measurements. It is highly exaggerating the reflections from the fixture due to very short distance to the driver in his test. While I have also removed the cage and built my own boom, the effect you are talking about is not there once you optimize the other aspects of NFS operation. The microphone front has far larger surface for reflections than the edges of that pipe for example.So I understand this. To get that last little bit of precision, you would like to modify the transition from the microphone to the end of the pipe?
There are also limitations to boom design which if done wrong, can interfere with the operation of NFS. I am surprised Erin is jumping into modifying the system before making a few measurements and learning those other aspects. Every time I modify the boom it takes me hours and hours to re-align the entire system to make sure this doesn't happen in actual use. The worst sound you can hear is the grinding of the stepper motor as the mic fixture crashes into the rest of the system!
I need to emphasize that you need to have a ton of experience with NFS under your belt before removing the cage. One wrong keystroke can shove the microphone into the speaker with drastic consequences during setup! Without the cage, you have no safety measures against this. There are also horrors you can face when the system is running especially unattended. If not done right, the system can slap the mic into the speaker, wiring to the speaker, rest of NFS system, etc. not just once but over and over again! I have had all of this happen after I removed the cage but thankfully, with no serious consequence as I was there to catch them. And testing was done with my own speakers and not others. After I removed the cage, I also watched the system like a hawk for many runs. I have now optimized the physical parameters of the measurement system which has sharply reduced chance of this happening. But at the start, it was hell.