In any case you should check by measurement if the filter slopes correspond to the desired LR filter fourth order at 2500Hz.
I would recommend to load the target functions (LR4@2,5kHz) for woofer and tweeter in REW as an overlay, then you can compare exactly with the VCAD simulations shown below:
tweeter with target HP LR4@2,5kHz
View attachment 197466
woofer with target LP LR4@2,5kHz
View attachment 197476
The VCAD simulation refers to a distance of 3m. If you measure at a distance of 1m at the height of the tweeter (this is the reference axis), then the FR of the woofer deviates minimally.
But the deviation is so small that this hardly matters.
View attachment 197478
If the filter slopes follow the target functions, but the resulting frequency response of the loudspeaker does not match the simulation, then you should check the delay set in the tweeter XO.
The passive radiator (PR) is, with the standard tuning in terms of max SPL very limited.
But by using the provided HP filter as a protection against too much excursion of the PR, the maximum SPL is almost arbitrarily adjustable, at the expense of low bass.
View attachment 197468
A fourth order Butterworth HP at 45Hz increases max SPL significantly. At the same time the f3 of the speaker is still at 45Hz, which is good for a speaker of this size.
Here is the comparison of the standard tuning without HP, with BW4@45Hz and BW4@50Hz.
First simulated max SPL in half-space, then excursion of woofer and PR:
standard tuning without HP (f3 about 38Hz), max SPL free field 95dB
View attachment 197469View attachment 197470
BW4@45Hz (f3 about 45Hz), max SPL free field 100dB
View attachment 197471 View attachment 197472
BW4@52Hz (f3 about 53Hz), max SPL free field 104dB
View attachment 197473 View attachment 197474
At the 104dB peak level, however, the voice coil of the woofer is loaded with 400W
, which the woofer certainly does not withstand very long.
Which HP frequency is chosen, everyone must decide for themselves.