Jerry Bruckheimer Fan
Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2020
- Messages
- 37
- Likes
- 5
I hope they can do a recall, or at least allow the owners with early units to exchange for a new one.
Why? Most owners will not even notice is the attitude currently taken by Sound United. You may have been a user of an altered AVR previously without knowing...I hope they can do a recall, or at least allow the owners with early units to exchange for a new one.
Why? Most owners will not even notice is the attitude currently taken by Sound United. You may have been a user of an altered AVR previously without knowing...
How many people do we know that have reported a problem outside of Amir's findings?
I haven’t seen bench tests in the 4500 so no way to know for sure. I would think the odds of them being very similar would be very high. If you don’t need or want 8k I would always opt for the prior model year around 1/2.May I ask how you feel the 4700 compares to a 4500 available at nearly 50% its cost. Still worth the extra?
There are interesting inferences you can make out of this.
If Denon support suggested only the last 3 digits were relevant (I don't know if that was the case or you are making this inference) , then it implies less than a 1000 were affected.
If they only gave the last S/N, then that would mean the entire initial batch up to that number were affected as they have said. Otherwise, you would need a starting and beginning number.
The fourth digit would also be relevant to see if this was the initial batch.
My returned unit had a s / n ending in 000001XX from Europe, so I guess it was affected, right?
test more avr and pre/pro from yamaha pleaseAs to a third unit to test, I don't think it makes sense to do that right this minute given my workload. Maybe in a couple of months we can take that on if someone local is willing.
The bad unit tested earlier here had the S/N ending in 2000403. Most likely yes assuming the last 6 digits refer to unit number.
Sorry for the late reply you all. Been busy with other things. Just added to the review:
EDIT: this is the serial number of the tested unit: DBCY032000007
If you are already replacing faulty ones, it likely would be worthwhile to upgrade them. If you are doing so due to aging capacitors, then it is also likely that the "non-faulty" ones are not far behind in becoming faulty and since you are already replacing some, I would suggest replacing the rest and upgrading at the same time. But that is just the way I see it. Others may have different thoughts on this. As always, your mileage may vary.Does this mean we should upgrade our caps in all our gear
My European AVC-X6700h unit S/N starts with DBCX0520...Wow, they sent the 7th unit produced for the second testing that was manufactured earlier than the first unit tested?
Hmmm... this would mean this is either an earlier unit that was "fixed", or an internal early unit that never had the problem. Raises more questions than answers. It certainly isn't one picked off the later production batch without an issue.
If you happen to own one or know someone that does, please do arrange to have one sent in to Amir. Remember, for the most part what gets tested is what people send in to test. And a plug for people to send stuff in to get tested... I have sent in: Emotiva XMC-1, Lyndorf TDAI 3400, NAD T758 V3, Revel M55XC and the Denon X8500. Amir pays return shipping and does a great job packing for return shipping (all items arrived back in perfect condition). If we want certain things tested... someone needs to send them in for testing. The broader the range of brands and models tested the larger the affect ASR has and the better consumers are informed.test more avr and pre/pro from yamaha please
My European AVC-X6700h unit S/N starts with DBCX0520...
Just a guess, but the the 32 and 52 might indicate the different regions, and the CX and CY could be the 'batch' or run number.
This could mean that CX ones are the ones affected and CY are the 'fixed' batch. So the newly tested unit was the 7th fixed one.