• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Class D FAQ

OP
Matias

Matias

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
5,031
Likes
10,800
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
I just listed common answers I have been writing throughout the years in different forums and groups. Haters gonna hate, offended people are going to be offended. Business as usual. :)
 

pjug

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 2, 2019
Messages
1,775
Likes
1,561
On the FTC 20-20K power question, I am wondering if this is really a big hurdle for Class D or if this is just a design decision not to care about meeting this. For example, the NAD C298 has a 20-20KHz power spec that is in line with the Purifi clipping levels. Is it just a matter of using an output filter that can survive the FTC test at high power?
 

boXem

Major Contributor
Audio Company
Joined
Jun 19, 2019
Messages
2,014
Likes
4,852
Location
Europe
On the FTC 20-20K power question, I am wondering if this is really a big hurdle for Class D or if this is just a design decision not to care about meeting this. For example, the NAD C298 has a 20-20KHz power spec that is in line with the Purifi clipping levels. Is it just a matter of using an output filter that can survive the FTC test at high power?
Yes
 
OP
Matias

Matias

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
5,031
Likes
10,800
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
On the FTC 20-20K power question, I am wondering if this is really a big hurdle for Class D or if this is just a design decision not to care about meeting this. For example, the NAD C298 has a 20-20KHz power spec that is in line with the Purifi clipping levels. Is it just a matter of using an output filter that can survive the FTC test at high power?
I think you should be looking at this from another angle. Class D manufacturers chose to forgo heatsinks because they were not needed in real world use. If they wanted to ace the FTC tests, there is nothing preventing them from adding large heatsinks (and even a fan or two) like traditional class AB amps. And behold, there goes a zillion watts in 20 kHz, yay! Now what customer is willing to pay for that? It is a free market, if a manufacturer thinks customers value this, go ahead and good luck.
 
Last edited:

somebodyelse

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 5, 2018
Messages
3,682
Likes
2,962
I would just say I have more confidence in Class AB and linear power supplies. I have never had to throw out a Class AB amp. Class D just don't have much of a lifetime track record yet.
In other words the FUD has been successful, and/or you happen to have the skill to fix one but not the other. There's nothing inherently more reliable or repairable about Class AB than Class D, or linear PSUs vs. SMPS. If you have the diagnostic skills and/or service manuals, the necessary equipment, and the parts are available, then they can be fixed, but it may not be cost effective.
 

pjug

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 2, 2019
Messages
1,775
Likes
1,561
In other words the FUD has been successful, and/or you happen to have the skill to fix one but not the other. There's nothing inherently more reliable or repairable about Class AB than Class D, or linear PSUs vs. SMPS. If you have the diagnostic skills and/or service manuals, the necessary equipment, and the parts are available, then they can be fixed, but it may not be cost effective.
This may be true, but my initial point is that warranty is generally better with Class AB amplifiers. Are Class D manufacturers spreading FUD by offering shorter warranties?
 

pma

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
4,591
Likes
10,727
Location
Prague
The parts that are subjected to high dV/dt like filter capacitors in Class D amplifiers and SMPS have considerably lower life time than the similar parts in linear circuits. There is no doubt.
 

somebodyelse

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 5, 2018
Messages
3,682
Likes
2,962
This may be true, but my initial point is that warranty is generally better with Class AB amplifiers. Are Class D manufacturers spreading FUD by offering shorter warranties?
I can probably find a few examples of manufacturers offering more than the mandatory warranty in Europe, but they're the exception rather than the rule.
 

somebodyelse

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 5, 2018
Messages
3,682
Likes
2,962
The parts that are subjected to high dV/dt like filter capacitors in Class D amplifiers and SMPS have considerably lower life time than the similar parts in linear circuits. There is no doubt.
You need to specify components suitable for the environment they'll be used in, and the design life. No doubt some will cut corners and have early failures, but that's not unique to Class D or SMPS.
 

shal

Active Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2019
Messages
119
Likes
122
Location
Rennes, France
I don't understand . We are on a science site.
So we have to avoid using undefined concept and measurement

The power of an amplifier is one of this measurement.
If a manufacturer said my amp is XXXX Watt . The forum have to ask "what is the definition of the measurement method".

So :
- "250W on typical music programm " is OK for me , the consumer have the information of the power provided is not really a measure.
- "250W following the method XXX" is OK for me, too

But
"250W" is just a useless information or even can be understanding by the consumer
 
OP
Matias

Matias

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
5,031
Likes
10,800
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
I don't understand . We are on a science site.
So we have to avoid using undefined concept and measurement

The power of an amplifier is one of this measurement.
If a manufacturer said my amp is XXXX Watt . The forum have to ask "what is the definition of the measurement method".

So :
- "250W on typical music programm " is OK for me , the consumer have the information of the power provided is not really a measure.
- "250W following the method XXX" is OK for me, too

But
"250W" is just a useless information or even can be understanding by the consumer
Read here for more info.
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/hypex-power-ratings.19302/
 

rony

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
14
Likes
4
In the FAQ, can someone please update Hypex-nCore vs Purify differences objectively. Thanks!
 
OP
Matias

Matias

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
5,031
Likes
10,800
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
In the FAQ, can someone please update Hypex-nCore vs Purify differences objectively. Thanks!
Honestly it is a tiny difference, like splitting hairs among the grand scheme of things. Both are way above average. Just check their datasheets.
 

restorer-john

Grand Contributor
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
12,580
Likes
38,281
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Another objective difference is only 10% of people seem to be able to correctly spell Purifi

Where are your measurements for that wild number of 90% who cannot spell Pewrefi? ;)
 
OP
Matias

Matias

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
5,031
Likes
10,800
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Distortion and IMD levels are much lower for Purifi.
IMO the difference in SINAD from 94 to 102 of the Hypexes to 104 dB of the Purifi is small next to the average SINAD 80 of the overall amplifier market.

histogram.jpg


Same goes for IMD. Sure, the highest distortion of the Purifi is around -125 dB in 17 kHz, compared to around -110 dB of both a Hypex NC502MP or a Parasound Halo A21+ (example of a 80 SINAD amplifier around the same power). But this IMD is not much audible in the high treble (Fletcher Munson curves).

I am super curious to see if Bruno can build a higher power module like 1+ kW with the same low distortion as the 1ET400A. That would pull ahead of the high power NCores. Fingers crossed! :)
 
Top Bottom