Can you redo full Hugo2 measurements?It was paired with Chord DAC, the Hugo 2.
You did it long time ago right after getting your AP
I imagine you're testing is better now than then
Can you redo full Hugo2 measurements?It was paired with Chord DAC, the Hugo 2.
Shouldn’t it be labeled 48kHz?Let's go back to basics and see if the M-scaler is doing what it is supposed to be doing by running our filter test with the D70s:
It is indeed. Both 2X and 4X modes provide an ultra sharp response. However they do so at the cost of higher noise floor/lower attenuation.
Yes. I will fix.Shouldn’t it be labeled 48kHz?
It's literally impossible to have SPLs higher than 194 dB in air at sea level. Sound is longitudinal, so the rarefaction of those waves can't get lower than vacuum pressure. There will be shockwave distortion.300dB? As in 1E15
I am not sure if I have time but will try....Can you redo full Hugo2 measurements?
It's literally impossible to have SPLs higher than 194 dB in air at sea level.
Good to read that there is some logic to the controls layout. The premise that I have for detesting the system that CHORD uses is it should not require any learning curve to speak of and it is a cost saving measure that eliminates the usual display and controls that would be associated with a proper and functional system. CHORD is cost scrimping on a high end unit.I don't find it takes any time to become familiar with the light scheme on the Mojo2. After a few hours with it I had it figured out, including the graphic equalizer which operates on some combination of the buttons and colors. Really is a simple thing to master.
We have the usual lightshow of buttons
And for reference, the Shoutometer.His claim is that he can hear distortion at -300dBfs, or something like that if I remember right.
To be even more fair, I think his claim is to hear differences in filters that only differ at the -300 db level. Or so I recall without going back to listen to his talks. But yeah, he might as well say -1000 db for all the credibility it has.His claim is that he can hear distortion at -300dBfs, or something like that if I remember right.
I'm not surprised it doesn't do anything audible, but I am surprised it isn't a good performer (in a measurements sense), for what it is supposed to be, if that makes sense.
He really did step into a big cow pie when he made that -300dB level claim.To be even more fair, I think his claim is to hear differences in filters that only differ at the -300 db level. Or so I recall without going back to listen to his talks. But yeah, he might as well say -1000 db for all the credibility it has.