No, but updates are easy and take 10 mins on average. I upgraded a first gen unit for my garage from ebay hook-up to update in 20 minutes. Worked perfectlyDo the latest NODEs come out of the box with the latest firmware?
No, but updates are easy and take 10 mins on average. I upgraded a first gen unit for my garage from ebay hook-up to update in 20 minutes. Worked perfectlyDo the latest NODEs come out of the box with the latest firmware?
There’s something about the Node measurements that leaves me confused—I went to my local hifi dealer and demoed an NAD C368 with the BlueOS MDC card installed, powering some Lumina II speakers…and the sound was incredible, nothing about the module made me think it would measure poorly. In fact, the demo basically sold me on going for a solution where I can integrate a BlueOS module in my amp. I’m not questioning the measurements of the node, I believe them, but I just…subjectively what I heard was incredible.
that's a good point, I guess I was just so impressed with it that I didn't focus on the "the node's dac section isn't good"; I don't know what dac is in the C368, NAD doesn't specify it on their site anywhere I could see it. I know that the NAD C399 has an ESS dac pulled from their masters gear, but even then IDK which one.First, the Node is a Bluesound product; the C368 is a NAD one. Same parent company, but there will be differences. At a glance, it appears that the C368 is more like a C 658 (streamer/DAC/preamp) with an amplifier added, and it uses a different DAC chip than the Node.
If you want to use a Node, then if you already have a DAC or buy a good but reasonably priced one, you can run the digital output of the Node into that. Amir notes that the digital output of the Node is just fine; his complaints are about the DAC section. Doing this gives you the BluOS functionality with better measured performance.
Amir did not like the C658 either, but (a) the unit that he had may have been broken, (b) a firmware update may have fixed the main issue that he saw, and (c) a number of others on the forum (myself included) liked the performance of that unit. Although the SINAD was nothing special, it's unclear how audible any issues there would be -- obviously those of us happy with the 658 weren't complaining.
FWIW, I previously had a C658, which I really liked; I moved to another setup for reasons unrelated to the performance of the 658. I now have a Node running to an external DAC, and like that setup very much -- the Node, like any decent streamer, has excellent digital output, and the BluOS software is intuitive, supports 20-some streaming services natively, and never lets me down.
The C386 uses a Burr-Brown PCM1795 DAC, the C399 uses a ESS Sabre DAC (9028).that's a good point, I guess I was just so impressed with it that I didn't focus on the "the node's dac section isn't good"; I don't know what dac is in the C368, NAD doesn't specify it on their site anywhere I could see it. I know that the NAD C399 has an ESS dac pulled from their masters gear, but even then IDK which one.
I'm certainly not saying whether the DAC in the C368 is special, just noting the listening experience with the Lumina II's was wonderful. Thanks for the info on which dacs are in the various products, I appreciate it.The C386 uses a Burr-Brown PCM1795 DAC, the C399 uses a ESS Sabre DAC (9028).
Both are nothing special at all.
I agree that the Node is a bit expensive at the $600 range. I got mine open box for about $470 so I was okay with that. I went the route of the Node and making a RasPi streamer as a test. I feel that the RasPi with a hat isn't as clear as the Node. The RasPi with no hat and a DAC is clearer in sound than the Node. I'm going to pick up an SU-9n for my Node and see how that works.I just read that post by Bluesound on their message board. It does say they're working on it, which is good, but it doesn't provide a timeline for development. I'm confident they'll find a solution.
Other than the MQA/Roon problem, the Node is fantastic. I only got it a few days ago primarily as a way to connect it to my ARES II DAC, which didn't work well with my laptop when playing Hi Res files using USB. But on the Node, no problems through optical and coax.
Still think the unit is overpriced at $599, especially since the internal DAC isn't anything remarkable. Wish they sold the unit without the DAC for much less.
As to expense, two things:I agree that the Node is a bit expensive at the $600 range. I got mine open box for about $470 so I was okay with that. I went the route of the Node and making a RasPi streamer as a test. I feel that the RasPi with a hat isn't as clear as the Node. The RasPi with no hat and a DAC is clearer in sound than the Node. I'm going to pick up an SU-9n for my Node and see how that works.
The RasPi is a good alternative but I feel like the OS options aren't as slick as BluOS. However, I used Subsonic for years and wish it was easier to get it on a RasPi and streaming out with no transcoding vs these OS options. BluOS is a bit clunky and hard to find if something isn't tagged exactly how they want it. Volumio seems to eat a lot of memory though and is sluggish.
But it certainly would be nice if they sold a stripped down version: no DAC, no subwoofer out, just a streamer.
If you are already running Roon, a Raspberry Pi can be a simple streamer with the Ropieee OS:+1. Would love to see Bluesound do this, or someone else who will include Roon service.
As an owner of four Bluesound units and lifetime Roon that argument breaks down when one buys a second or third $550 Node. They will be forced to come up with some alternate scheme if companies like WiiM are successful and incorporate Roon.1) part of the cost of a Node is a "permanent software license" for BluOS, including all upgrades. No annual fee, etc.
I use the Node with a Topping D30Pro in preamp mode, outputting digital USB from the Node. I can adjust volume using either the BluOS app or the D30Pro's control (knob and/or remote).Does the Bluesound Node allow volume control with the THX Onyx on the usb output?
Basically, I’m looking to bypass the internal DAC with the USB THX Onyx DAC, but retain app and HDMI volume control.
Just curious: given that you control the Node wirelessly, why do you need several of them? Can't Roon direct the output to wherever you need it? Or the built-in BluOS software? As you can guess easily, I have a much simpler one Node to DAC to amps to speakers chain, so I am not up on all of the capabilities or lack thereof.As an owner of four Bluesound units and lifetime Roon that argument breaks down when one buys a second or third $550 Node. They will be forced to come up with some alternate scheme if companies like WiiM are successful and incorporate Roon.
I have 3 separate systems in different rooms, each wired Ethernet, (main, HT, and garage) and my wife likes her Pulse Mini which goes where she does by WiFi. Can control any and/or all with ether BluOS or Roon via WiFi. Bluesound was the best endpoint solution for me starting in 2017 with computer and lifetime Roon early in 2016. May dump Bluesound if WiiM Mini gets Roon, not sure.Just curious: given that you control the Node wirelessly, why do you need several of them? Can't Roon direct the output to wherever you need it? Or the built-in BluOS software? As you can guess easily, I have a much simpler one Node to DAC to amps to speakers chain, so I am not up on all of the capabilities or lack thereof.
Have to mention that the USB file management is horrendous. Probabily one of the worse ever made on such device. Definetly not the tool to play your music from your USB library. I suspect Bluesound to push owners to stream via internet rather than play their saved music files (or simply save money not develloping this USB file management) .
Of course you can stream from another device via a third party software and use Bluetooth. But putting such a big effort to make a nice streaming Device/software and totally wasting the USB file management is a total shame and/or a customer rip off.