It looks like 3e A5 provides 122w / 62w into 4 ohm and 8 ohm while the Topping provides 71w / 53w, and the 3e has a somewhat neater power supply. That power difference looks quite significant. I wonder also, but we don't know about performance into 2ohm loads (for comparison).
Good point about the price ... I think it might fluctuate a bit ... hopefully downwards given the Topping's latest price you mention! ... the 3e's were significantly discounted on first launch ... 15% lower than now I think.
Post edit ... just looked at the audiophonics prices ... much higher than I paid for an A5 on first launch on Ali. I think these (Audiophonics) are a bit high to start with ... and especially the A7! Ouch!... and that is including tax to Europe ... I think the A7 might be 1/3 higher!
The PA5 II lists at € 164.14 on hifigo, but I am not sure if that is an expired sales price, because when you click on it, the price (with 19% German VAT) is € 193.11. But the A5 should really be compared to the PA5 II that has about 40% more power into 4 Ohms. It lists at € 251.33 on hifigo.
I have Amir's results for the A5 and PA5 II copied side by side. Unless the 15 kHz THD+N will tell us a different story, I'd still argue that aside from the power, the PA5 II is still a hair's breadth ahead:
- SINAD is identical
- 1 kHz 2nd and 3rd harmonic are 2 dB lower in the PA5 II (ok, that is within unit-to-unit variation), but maybe more significantly, harmonics in the 12 - 20 kHz range are about 8 dB lower for the PA5 II
- similarly, in the multitone IMD test, the grass in the 12 - 20 kHz range is about 5 dB lower in the PA5 II
- in two-tone IMD, 18 and 21 kHz products are about 2 dB lower in the PA5 II
- for the next order (16 andd 22 kHz), the PA5 II is aobout 8 dB lower
- (for the products around 38 kHz, the A5 is about 15 dB better, but I think this is owed to a steeper output filter rather than better transfer function linearity)
I did a similar side by side with archimago's tests of the A5 and PA5 II Plus, and they were more like head-to-head regarding SINAD and IMD, and with a (smaller) edge on output power for the A5 (4R: 121 vs. 102 W, 8R 62 vs. 56 W).
So other than the 10 - 20% higher output power (depending on whether you look at 4 or 8 R and the Plus version or not), I do not yet see what the A5 does better, even if it comes close or maybe draws equal.
How does the A5 achieve higher power? It does use 2x TPA3251 whereas Topping never told us what chip they use or how many.