This is a review and technical measurements of the (late) Jeff Bagby Mandolin DIY kit as built by our member, @Rick Sykora. Looks like the drivers and crossover for a pair cost US $316.42. Rick will have to advise as to the rest of the cost.
As usual, Rick has built this speaker as a tank, weighing far more than commercial speakers its size:
As expected, there is a port in the back:
Measurements that you are about to see were performed using the Klippel Near-field Scanner (NFS). This is a robotic measurement system that analyzes the speaker all around and is able (using advanced mathematics and dual scan) to subtract room reflections (so where I measure it doesn't matter). It also measures the speaker at close distance ("near-field") which sharply reduces the impact of room noise. Both of these factors enable testing in ordinary rooms yet results that can be more accurate than an anechoic chamber. In a nutshell, the measurements show the actual sound coming out of the speaker independent of the room.
I performed over 1400 measurement which resulted in error rate of around 1%.
Testing temperature was around 65 degrees F.
Reference axis for measurements was the center of the tweeter (by eye).
Measurements are compliant with latest speaker research into what can predict the speaker preference and is standardized in CEA/CTA-2034 ANSI specifications. Likewise listening tests are performed per research that shows mono listening is much more revealing of differences between speakers than stereo or multichannel.
Bagby Mandolin Measurements
Acoustic measurements can be grouped in a way that can be perceptually analyzed to determine how good a speaker is and how it can be used in a room. This so called spinorama shows us just about everything we need to know about the speaker with respect to tonality and some flaws:
On-axis response is less even than I like. We have some peaking around 100 Hz but then a broad dip up to 700 Hz. There is another dip around crossover region of 3 kHz. Tweeter is beaming due to lack of waveguide as you will see later.
Efficiency is low averaging around 83 dB (by eye) so you need a lot of power to drive this speaker.
Port resonance is not an issue but woofer seems to be running out of steam before tweeter takes over:
Early window reflections show the results of tweeter narrowing:
And here is the combined, predicted response:
Horizontal beam width shows the uneven directivity of the woofer and tweeter:
I have shown a secondary upward arrow to show the physics of beam width reducing in size as frequencies get smaller (relative to size of the tweeter). Same is seen in contour graph:
Vertical response shows more degrees of freedom than some other 2-way speakers:
Distortion is good at 86 dBSPL:
Finally, impedance at nearly 7 ohm should be easy for any amp to drive (that has the power this speaker needs):
Speaker Listening Tests
Garden season has started and with me spending a lot more time outside during fruit tree blossoming, my ears are fully plugged today. I did a quick listen and could hear the effect of bass boost around 100 Hz since I also have a room mode there. Lowering that peaked not only helped with a bit of boominess but also resulted in more clarity upstream indicating lowering of distortion. Above bass my ears were too clogged to asses anything so not much else to report.
Conclusions
I don't have any since I could not complete my subjective evaluation. You all can post what you think.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.
Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150
As usual, Rick has built this speaker as a tank, weighing far more than commercial speakers its size:
As expected, there is a port in the back:
Measurements that you are about to see were performed using the Klippel Near-field Scanner (NFS). This is a robotic measurement system that analyzes the speaker all around and is able (using advanced mathematics and dual scan) to subtract room reflections (so where I measure it doesn't matter). It also measures the speaker at close distance ("near-field") which sharply reduces the impact of room noise. Both of these factors enable testing in ordinary rooms yet results that can be more accurate than an anechoic chamber. In a nutshell, the measurements show the actual sound coming out of the speaker independent of the room.
I performed over 1400 measurement which resulted in error rate of around 1%.
Testing temperature was around 65 degrees F.
Reference axis for measurements was the center of the tweeter (by eye).
Measurements are compliant with latest speaker research into what can predict the speaker preference and is standardized in CEA/CTA-2034 ANSI specifications. Likewise listening tests are performed per research that shows mono listening is much more revealing of differences between speakers than stereo or multichannel.
Bagby Mandolin Measurements
Acoustic measurements can be grouped in a way that can be perceptually analyzed to determine how good a speaker is and how it can be used in a room. This so called spinorama shows us just about everything we need to know about the speaker with respect to tonality and some flaws:
On-axis response is less even than I like. We have some peaking around 100 Hz but then a broad dip up to 700 Hz. There is another dip around crossover region of 3 kHz. Tweeter is beaming due to lack of waveguide as you will see later.
Efficiency is low averaging around 83 dB (by eye) so you need a lot of power to drive this speaker.
Port resonance is not an issue but woofer seems to be running out of steam before tweeter takes over:
Early window reflections show the results of tweeter narrowing:
And here is the combined, predicted response:
Horizontal beam width shows the uneven directivity of the woofer and tweeter:
I have shown a secondary upward arrow to show the physics of beam width reducing in size as frequencies get smaller (relative to size of the tweeter). Same is seen in contour graph:
Vertical response shows more degrees of freedom than some other 2-way speakers:
Distortion is good at 86 dBSPL:
Finally, impedance at nearly 7 ohm should be easy for any amp to drive (that has the power this speaker needs):
Speaker Listening Tests
Garden season has started and with me spending a lot more time outside during fruit tree blossoming, my ears are fully plugged today. I did a quick listen and could hear the effect of bass boost around 100 Hz since I also have a room mode there. Lowering that peaked not only helped with a bit of boominess but also resulted in more clarity upstream indicating lowering of distortion. Above bass my ears were too clogged to asses anything so not much else to report.
Conclusions
I don't have any since I could not complete my subjective evaluation. You all can post what you think.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.
Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150