not this way. Until a convincing mathematical model of hearing is not created, I will take into account the subjective listening and the available measurements both. I am just sharing my experience with E30 on of this thread about E30. If someone gets "stirred up" just by a fact that different people have different experiences then I feel sorry for his handicap.
Every brain, every psychological imprint, every ear shape, every interpretation, every emotion, every prejudice, every musical taste, every historical context, every culture differs per person. I am sure I forgot to mention a lot of other variables. A short term for this is 'subjectivity'.
Good luck to you waiting for your 'convincing mathematical model of hearing' taking all fore mentioned variables into account. I can tell you already that this mathematical model never will substantiate because of the simple fact that everybody hears and interprets differently.
The next best thing is to rely on objective measurements we know and trust. Of course it is not impossible to find more measurements in the future as more knowledge is gathered. Until then we have to deal with what we have and know now.
On a side note: I can't take your subjective/anecdotal opinion seriously when you compare the E30 to your grandma's tv box. That says more about your own subjective hidden agenda, past, psychologie, emotions, prejudices etc. than about the E30. It is a pity there is no 'convincing mathematical method' to filter such pointless subjectivity out of the equation.
Also moving the goalposts constantly in your posts and positing unsubstantiated anecdotal claims does not help much to inspire more confidence. It certainly does not help in having a constructive discussion about the subject at hand.
Last edited: