I just posted this summary of Erin's new video on the "other thread":
The measurements with the feet in place were essentially no different. And Erin spends about 10 minutes going through the communications with Eric Alexander -- Eric definitely threated him with litigation if the review wasn't pulled and demanded Erin post up a mea culpa video. He was also very derogatory about Erin's expertise (much like he was here with Amir), claiming the cabinet resonance at 250 Hz was due to the missing feet, etc. With the feet in place, nothing changed with the 250 Hz resonance.
Update: Eric suggested that litigation would be avoided if he brought a set of Troubadors in person to Erin and witnessed the Klippel testing in person and then film a joint video(!). He also was continually emailing Erin saying that he had now lost $3k in sales, then $6k in sales, etc. He also claimed he was going to send Erin measurements but then demanded that they have a conversation with lawyers again. It's a mess.
Update #2: Hard to watch the end as you could tell Erin was struggling with his emotions...this whole incident really caused him a ton of stress and anxiety. Eric Alexander is a real piece of work.
I read the "litigation" discussion from Eric, where he says he's not suing anyone, but insists on a lawyer-to-lawyer discussion, and that's his interpretation of "litigation". Since I'm married to a US litigation attorney, I asked her for the definition of the term litigation, and she responded: "An action initiated in a court of law." Erin and Amir apparently have no legal obligation whatsoever to respond to Eric's demand that their respective lawyers have a discussion, because no one has filed a lawsuit. Worse for Eric, since both Amir and Erin used similar state of the art scientific measurement equipment to support their conclusions, Eric and his attorney would run the risk of a judge deeming any lawsuit to be "frivolous", which would have "consequences" for both Eric and his attorney. Attacking Amir's credentials looks really dumb, because he was a recent presenter at an AES conference regarding DAC measurements. While DACs are not speakers, it would still be convincing evidence, along with Amir's investment in Klippel equipment, that he is serious about an objective measurement approach, and not slander. So it is a stretch to believe any attorney would agree to file the lawsuit, though I have no doubt there are many attorneys who would not mind a bunch of billable hours for phone calls and "demand letters".
I'm also wondering what discussions Eric has actually had with an attorney, since I'm also told that "slander" is not a modern legal term in the US, and that the legal issue is called defamation.