Ah sorry, I'm not aware of an available data file. I wasn't sure if you were doing some chart digitizing from images to gather manufactacturer data sources.thanks that's nice. Do you see a file with data I could download? Or maybe you can ask them to share the data?
i sometimes digitalized the spin (takes 10 minutes) but I am too lazy to do the 72 measurements when they are available.Ah sorry, I'm not aware of an available data file. I wasn't sure if you were doing some chart digitizing from images to gather manufactacturer data sources.
Hello ! This tool is absolutly amazing, great work!
I have a UX suggestion:
- Could it be possible to select the line or lines we want to see in the graph ?
For example, when I compare two speakers, I would like to be able to see the "on axis of speaker A" and "on axis of speaker B".
Or "on axis speaker A" + "on axis speaker B" + "sound power di speaker A" + "sound power di speaker B"
Or "on axis speaker A" + "sound power di speaker B" (even if doesn't make sense).
The reason is that I have difficulty comprehending the big picture of the multiples lines displayed at the same time...
It could be a nice way to "unclutter" the graph for newbies like me. What do you think ?
Thank you
True. At the same time the differences are not so large. Here is an example with score being 7.23 with PEQ and 7.13 with GEQ, the difference 0.1 is not statistically significant. Honestly a basic GEQ like the DBX 231s for ~ 150$ does a good enough job.AutomaticEQ (which are PEQs) are the most accurate.
But since not every hardware supports PEQs, you’ll likely use GEQs in those cases, which are less accurate but better than nothing.
For example:
-VLC media player doesn’t support PEQs, but it supports 31 band GEQs.
-Equalizer APO (for Windows) supports PEQs.
-MiniDSP hardware supports PEQs.
Most people should be using PEQs since most modern hardware supports it.
Amazing! Thank you PierreYou can add/remove a graph by clicking in the legend. Each click toggle between visible/hidden states.
I was just thinking about this the other day. A slider for pricing filtering would be amazing. The current dropdown selection has very limited filtering ranges. It would be nice to see all <$500 or <$1000, etc.@pierre heads up that your price ranges are not inclusive on either side, so anything right on the limits will get filtered out. Example: the Polk XT15 is filtered out if you select either "<100$" or "100$-200$".
The price ranges don't seem to consistently filter on price per speaker either. Example: the same 4 Polk models are displayed whether you choose "100$-200$" or "200$-300$"
Any chance of implementing a slider for price filtering?
ok sliders it will be. I also have new parameters (size, weigth, …, sensitivity, max spl etc) most would be better with a slider.I was just thinking about this the other day. A slider for pricing filtering would be amazing. The current dropdown selection has very limited filtering ranges. It would be nice to see all <$500 or <$1000, etc.
I had some time to kill in a plane and I played with all the data’s that Amir gives us.
you can see them on www.spinorama.org The code to generate them is On github Too.
your display site is great, only small change, can you please change the low freq limit (currently it is 100 hz )in the SPL contour graph from 100 to maybe 50 or at last 80 hz ?. the directivity of subwoofer dipol or not is report here. https://www.linkwitzlab.com/AES'98/aes-98.htm
there are diffrences . also a rear bass port can act as a little dipol at some frequencies. so it is usefull to see below 100 hz because below 100 hz also the bass port do putput more