Sorry for the noob question, but why you should use an external amp to drive active speakers?My active speakers love to be driven by a pair of PA5 IIs
View attachment 317976View attachment 317975
Sorry for the noob question, but why you should use an external amp to drive active speakers?My active speakers love to be driven by a pair of PA5 IIs
View attachment 317976View attachment 317975
You can also ask Genelec the same thing about their 8381A.Sorry for the noob question, but why you should use an external amp to drive active speakers?
Yes, that is a bit misleading. As you know, loudspeakers with integrated amplifiers are called active loudspeakers. This also applies to those that, as in my case, do not have a passive crossover and thus the tweeters and midwoofers are each operated with their own amplifiers and upstream active crossovers.Sorry for the noob question, but why you should use an external amp to drive active speakers?
Nice ! At which frequencies do you crossover?My active speakers love to be driven by a pair of PA5 IIs
View attachment 317976View attachment 317975
I'll let you know about that in a private message.Nice ! At which frequencies do you crossover?
Are ones the same? Similar to PA5 defect? Or just inappropriate using?Yikes...
So far I read 2 customers having issues on this forum with PA5 II
the 2 are in this thread alreadyAre ones the same? Similar to PA5 defect? Or just inappropriate using?
Sorry, I guessed those issues details are in your memory, and you mean some technical conclusion.the 2 are in this thread already
no sorry i only remember 2 complaints , not detailsSorry, I guessed those issues details are in your memory, and you mean some technical conclusion.
Ferrari performances, Yugo reliability.no sorry i only remember 2 complaints , not details
you will have to read the 29 pages like i did :-(
maybe my memory is wrong and you will find more complaints?
For the original yes - cannot say yet for Mk2.Ferrari performances, Yugo reliability.
Retired car dealer here being curious.Ferrari performances, Yugo reliability.
I own a Ferrari Portofino M. Never owned a Yugo but when I was living in the us (‘80s-90s) this was a synonym of poor reliability.Retired car dealer here being curious.
Survey:-
Of the two above, you have owned
One
Both
Neither.
Thanks for taking part.
Sorry but I do not understand what “0 miles faults” means, English is not my first language.For the original yes - cannot say yet for Mk2.
Btw - maybe you don't know but I know from personal work, high end car brands that do sometimes come with 0 mile faults...
If you think there has never been a Ferrari with a 0 mile fault... you would be
It means a fault with 0 miles driven (a brand new car)Sorry but I do not understand what “0 miles faults” means, English is not my first language.
To tell the truth a Ferrari back then wasn't really reliable either and when I see some quality issues they still have not the synonym for reliability which might be rather an older Toyota or Lexus. Nevertheless the Portofino is a beauty and the sound of any Ferrari lovely.I own a Ferrari Portofino M. Never owned a Yugo but when I was living in the us (‘80s-90s) this was a synonym of poor reliability.