- Joined
- Oct 11, 2019
- Messages
- 1,855
- Likes
- 2,778
Just ran the calculation and it is roughly 1.8 dBm. So at maximum output the difference will be barely audible.1.8 dB
Last edited:
Just ran the calculation and it is roughly 1.8 dBm. So at maximum output the difference will be barely audible.1.8 dB
envelope pushing of.. inaudible stuff? you mean like fancy cables? why criticize those but give a pass to this? just hypocrisy or? shall we start measuring "best" speakers by how much they can play frequencies beyond 20kHz?That is a legitimate viewpoint. No one is arguing that the noise and distortion performance the LA90 achieves is audible. But to get near its envelope-pushing performance in that area, you need to spend a heck of a lot more than $800, with the notable exception of another Topping product which people similarly slammed for being “too expensive” and “underpowered.”
People like to complain just to hear their own voices and to see if they can bait others. That’s called trolling.
Your example is only 5 dB louder. But I agree with your point. But the options aren’t as prevalent as I would like. Here is a screen capture of the amps over 80 SINAD (my threshold given listening style and need for headroom) that have been reviewed. Is there a $400 to $800 dollar amp that does 150-160 into 8ohms at a reasonable SINAD, flat response, and low distortion across the spectrum? The only one I’m seeing on the list is the Outlaw 2200. It’s frequency response isn’t great, but it gets you 200 watts into 8 ohms and two channels would be about the same cost as the LA90. But if you don’t need the power (and many people don’t since 8/16 watts 4/8 ohms will give you 90 dBSPL at a 2 meter distance with 90db/watt/meter speakers), the LA90 is a bit better in some perhaps audible ways, much better in inaudible ways.
View attachment 209669
Who's comparing an 80w amp to a 120w amp? This is a 32w amp into 8 ohms. This amplifier has very very good specs, at 32 watts into 8ohms. It's numbers definitely do give it and it's owners bragging rights. No better sound, but yes it measures incredibly well. There are so many products on the market (several reviewed here) that offer better value is my point.There is no practical difference between an 80wpc amp and a 120wpc amp if you are considering power output alone. It can get probably 1-2% louder at maximum volume—I can’t even guess how many dB that is but it’s got to be less than 1dB.
what is this 80wpc amp you're talking about in the LA90 thread of 36wpc clean power?
envelope pushing of.. inaudible stuff? you mean like fancy cables? why criticize those but give a pass to this? just hypocrisy or? shall we start measuring "best" speakers by how much they can play frequencies beyond 20kHz?
how are so few people here not understanding that these ridiculous lines of thoughts actually "delegitimize" this forum and what it stands for? that it gives actually legit and tangible "ammunition" to the detractors? that if taken further (i.e. Topping releasing a 10wpc with an even higher sinad and same lack of features), instead of it being the beginning of the revolution, it will become a joke and everything will go back to 5000$ cables and power conditioners and ethernet switches?
sad
btw, the complaints about power and $$$ were much much rarer on the PA5 thread.
This is getting ridiculous. You really want to make the argument that going beyond what is necessary is equivalent to the fancy audio cable snake oil thing?? It really feels like you're making such an argument without actually considering the data.
2 things:
1) fancy audio cables don't even measure better in the 10Hz - 30kHz -ish range to begin with, or if so, only very marginally, at 6-10 foot lengths people typically use other than maybe using a truly grounded shield (which no amp supports!) and twisting, but hey maybe you can prove me wrong.
you're telling me my arguments are "ridiculous" when you had to go out of your way to construct an example by using headphones on a speaker amp with no headphone out just to try and prove a point? lol2) As to the argument that "the LA90 measurements could never matter in real life", well let's just put some numbers to that... so, in Topping's lineup let's use their next level down example, the PA5: For example, I have a 110db/watt headphone (at ~8 ohms impedance) that I could drive with my Topping PA5. However I really like quiet listening, and a recent test shows my listening level at times is around 60 db. Checking the Topping PA5's ASR measurements and assuming it goes down linearly to that level, that means the background noise would be at about -45db. That's in the zone of "inaudible, but not hugely so". Is it really fanciful to consider that I'd perhaps want it to be lower than that?
I'm still puzzled on the "why do you care so much to judge" thing. You also don't know my application. Yes my example above is technically a headphone, but it was one that is meant for being driven on speaker amp taps given the low impedance. There might be cases where it might dip as low as 4 ohms or lower depending on the cabling I use. Many ASR readers are audio geeks who do Weird stuff....
you're telling me my arguments are "ridiculous" when you had to go out of your way to construct an example by using headphones on a speaker amp with no headphone out just to try and prove a point? lol
the audible benefits are super marginal and very very very niche in an already niche category, but can be found even in the speaker world (given by people, even in this very thread, iirc)
i stopped reading here because this is taking "ridiculousness" to whole new highs
the whole point was that calling this amp "the best", and i'm repeating myself for probably the 10th time here, when it's inaudibly better than what people consider "the competition" in roughly 99,999% of the use cases, but is actually audibly worse (less gain, less power i.e. will clip sooner) in a lot of use cases... is counterproductive and is just changing one cult for another.
not to mention that 99,99% of the people into high end audio wouldn't be able to tell the difference in blind tests between this and your average flat fr "big brand" integrated amp with a sinad score of 80-90 with orders of magnitude more features, often at a fraction of the cost
I'm an electrical engineer and this is bullshitSkillful selection of capacitors is the whole secret of the art of audio.
Well, try using a tantalum capacitor in a passive speaker crossover, and you’ll know what he’s talking aboutI'm an electrical engineer and this is bullshit
Here the measurement proofWell, try using a tantalum capacitor in a passive speaker crossover, and you’ll know what he’s talking about
That doesn't make capacitor selection the "whole secret of the art of audio"Well, try using a tantalum capacitor in a passive speaker crossover, and you’ll know what he’s talking about
Obviously not.. notice the smiley faceThat doesn't make capacitor selection the "whole secret of the art of audio"
You have a 110dB/W headphone with low impedance and you buy a speaker power amplifier to drive it? And you will be using the ****** pot to control the volume? I'm slightly confused.Yes my example above is technically a headphone, but it was one that is meant for being driven on speaker amp taps given the low impedance
What's the top speed of the car you own? What's the maximum speed you are allowed to drive it? Could you have bought one that was cheaper but a little slower but could still reach the maximum speed allowed?yes, fancy cables measure better... marginally. so marginally, as to being totally inaudible as we're talking literally fractions of a decibel. why would i try to "prove you wrong" when that's what i'm talking about? wth you on?
you're telling me my arguments are "ridiculous" when you had to go out of your way to construct an example by using headphones on a speaker amp with no headphone out just to try and prove a point? lol
the audible benefits are super marginal and very very very niche in an already niche category, but can be found even in the speaker world (given by people, even in this very thread, iirc)
i stopped reading here because this is taking "ridiculousness" to whole new highs
the whole point was that calling this amp "the best", and i'm repeating myself for probably the 10th time here, when it's inaudibly better than what people consider "the competition" in roughly 99,999% of the use cases, but is actually audibly worse (less gain, less power i.e. will clip sooner) in a lot of use cases... is counterproductive and is just changing one cult for another.
not to mention that 99,99% of the people into high end audio wouldn't be able to tell the difference in blind tests between this and your average flat fr "big brand" integrated amp with a sinad score of 80-90 with orders of magnitude more features, often at a fraction of the cost
lol what? that's such a misguided and misinformed and ignorant attempt at an analogy it's not even worth the bytes onto which it is now permanently recorded on the internetWhat's the top speed of the car you own? What's the maximum speed you are allowed to drive it? Could you have bought one that was cheaper but a little slower but could still reach the maximum speed allowed?
Raal SR1a with modded cables and connected to a transformer to get that kind of sensitivity. Headphone amps work great for driving things with high impedance, but mostly not so great for low impedance, and most would heat up internally a huge amount in those kind of conditions, if not get damaged internally. You did note the "could go down to 4 ohms" comment, right?You have a 110dB/W headphone with low impedance and you buy a speaker power amplifier to drive it? And you will be using the ****** pot to control the volume? I'm slightly confused.
So a pillar is a pillar and that is it regardless of it being made of wood (many types available), iron, plastic...graphene...I'm an electrical engineer and this is bullshit
It would be nice if you cited the report, as I can’t find it and the British Air Ministry was testing planes with Whittle engines in 1939. My understanding is that development of the comet was slow due to safety concerns (pilots being more valuable than planes). Thus the quote you provide seems likely out of context and might be more reflective of resource allocation during an existential crisis, rather than pure possibility as it is used to imply here.So a pillar is a pillar and that is it regardless of it being made of wood (many types available), iron, plastic...graphene...
Guess then the same goes for fuels. It burns. End of the story.
Finding a good material for the light bulb took some time, I was told.
And the music ? Just C D E F G A B and at times F# or Bb. Cannot be made to sound much different.
Jet engines...? THE COMMITTEE ON GAS TURBINES appointed by THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES wrote.on June 10, 1940, that "In its present state, and even considering the improvements possible when adopting the higher temperatures proposed for the immediate future, the gas turbine engine could hardly be considered a feasible application to airplanes mainly because of the difficulty in complying with the stringent weight requirements imposed by aeronautics... .... ....", ending the note with "....a gas turbine seems beyond the real of possibility with existing materials"
Mr. Whittle nevertheless built the jet and when years later knew about that note he said : "Good thing I was too stupid to know this."
So a pillar is a pillar and that is it regardless of it being made of wood (many types available), iron, plastic...graphene...
Guess then the same goes for fuels. It burns. End of the story.
Finding a good material for the light bulb took some time, I was told.
And the music ? Just C D E F G A B and at times F# or Bb. Cannot be made to sound much different.
Jet engines...? THE COMMITTEE ON GAS TURBINES appointed by THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES wrote.on June 10, 1940, that "In its present state, and even considering the improvements possible when adopting the higher temperatures proposed for the immediate future, the gas turbine engine could hardly be considered a feasible application to airplanes mainly because of the difficulty in complying with the stringent weight requirements imposed by aeronautics... .... ....", ending the note with "....a gas turbine seems beyond the real of possibility with existing materials"
Mr. Whittle nevertheless built the jet and when years later knew about that note he said : "Good thing I was too stupid to know this."
Skillful selection of capacitors is the whole secret of the art of audio.
Actually it still is, noise? Fair. Distortion? I don't think so, unless of course someone has a proof.The main point was it's not beyond the stretch of imagination to have an application where ultra-low distortion could come into play as useful.
Ah you mean, can I hear the ultra-low distortion at full power? Haha, agreed no.Actually it still is, noise? Fair. Distortion? I don't think so, unless of course someone has a proof.