Someone did that recently and someone else said something like, "You do realize that Class D isn't digital." That kind of bugged me when it happened, and without looking back to see where it had occurred I assumed that it was you who had referred to Class D as a "digital amplifier", this being a plausible explanation for why you more recently went to the bother of saying that you realized that Class D isn't digital. So my remark was really intended to sort of question the purpose behind drawing the distinction and for previously admonishing you (if it was you) for referring to a Class D amp as a "digital amplifier". My purpose here was not to admonish you or anything of that sort, but to mildly admonish in a very sheepish way that idea that the distinction was all that important. If I made you feel self-conscious I apologize; that was not my intent at all. But I did also decided, after I thought about the question for a moment or two, that it might be appropriate to clarify the distinction so that at least someone had actually said something about why a Class D amp isn't, strictly speaking, a "digital" amp. In any case, I again apologize if I offended you even in the slightest, which was certainly not my intent.