I read the Stereophile review by Herb of one of the larger designs with the "patented" tweeter array. I thought Herb went out of his way to say they were recommended, as he mentioned how much moving around of the speaker he had to do in order to be satisfied. As well as stuffing socks into the ports at various times. You have to read between the lines with the Stereophile reviewers because they almost always say the word "recommended".
"It was not subtle. The [$2000/pair] Tekton Impact Monitors were doing it all: singing, drumming, shaking the air, drawing me in, and making every CD or LP pure pleasure to listen to. A little soft . . . but not too soft. Imagine a gentle but guiding touch with a most perfect sparkleand then...
www.stereophile.com
Just from this Stereophile review, which I recently re-read, the designer came off as amateurish--as many autodidacts do (he obviously was not educated in audio engineering). The explanations regarding violin mass, etc.,
definitely sounded like snake oil claims simply because there was no data to back it up. He just claimed that his approach sounds better.
This guy is a doofus--of course he might try to sue me for saying that.
Good luck for him to show injury/damages in court. "Placing my abilities in a false light", come on. I'm guessing his business isn't doing that well or he wouldn't care about these reviews or would engage the reviewers in a collegiate manner. I would go so far to agree with what appears to be his concern: That any jerk can post a review of his speakers. But that's about it. This seems like a "sticks and stones" situation.