• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

SMSL M500 DAC and HP Amp Review

w1000i

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 31, 2019
Messages
260
Likes
138
Location
Jubail SA
I tried ROON filter and compare it with M500 filter. ROON filter change the sound very slightly compare to M500 which didn't change anything.

Also I tired upsampling ROON features and I LOVED it, the sound improved slightly with better definition and detailed.
 

Mamoles

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Messages
40
Likes
12
Location
Paris
If M500 is connected on USB directly to your PC, you can easily configure foobar to output native DSD stream, not DoP (DSD over PCM).
And DSD512 you can only do via native DSD, not DoP.

Hi everyone,
As i use the optical intput, I've setup Minimstreamer in order to transcode DSD to WAV via DOP (dsf:dopwav) and the file is read but no sound.
If i transcode it to WAV without DOP (dsf:wav), it works (PCM 44.1 ~ 192kHz )
Is it normal ? SMSL says : Optique, Coaxial : PCM 44.1 ~ 192kHz / DSD64 (DoP)
I've gaot a last question. As Minimserver is transcoding, what do i have to do with the "transcoding option" in Bubble uPnp ?
Do i need to disable it ?
 

Veri

Master Contributor
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
9,599
Likes
12,041
Brighter sound got little smooth, with bright headphone like DT900pro with bright song you can hear the smoothing when up-sampling in ROON.
Problem is, that's just your subjective impression without any explanation. The topic has been discussed before and there's no real proof of any value to upsampling. Your (D-S) DAC already oversamples to a really high sample rate anyway, you are aware of this?
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...t-is-the-point-of-upsampling.7329/post-168399
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/dac-to-upsample-or-not-to-upsample.9731/

Therefore I have my doubts about the reality of your statement.
 

Toku

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
2,435
Likes
2,839
Location
Japan
Hi everyone,
As i use the optical intput, I've setup Minimstreamer in order to transcode DSD to WAV via DOP (dsf:dopwav) and the file is read but no sound.
If i transcode it to WAV without DOP (dsf:wav), it works (PCM 44.1 ~ 192kHz )
Is it normal ? SMSL says : Optique, Coaxial : PCM 44.1 ~ 192kHz / DSD64 (DoP)
I've gaot a last question. As Minimserver is transcoding, what do i have to do with the "transcoding option" in Bubble uPnp ?
Do i need to disable it ?
I imagine that the reason why there is no sound is that Minimstreamer is unable to send the signal via OPT connection because DSD to WAV via DOP (dsf: dopwav) converts it to a bit rate higher than 192kHz.
 

Mamoles

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Messages
40
Likes
12
Location
Paris
I imagine that the reason why there is no sound is that Minimstreamer is unable to send the signal via OPT connection because DSD to WAV via DOP (dsf: dopwav) converts it to a bit rate higher than 192kHz.

I've given up the dop option and i've concentrated on transcoding DSD to WAV over SPDIF using dsf:wav24
It works but
When using dsf:wav24;192,i play a DSD file and Bubble upnp displays WAV 192kHz 24bits but he M500 is displayig 96kHz. I don't inderstand.
If i play a 192kHz FLAC file, the M500 displays 96kHz as well.

By the way, do you guys think the M500 Optical input quality is good.
Are the M500 test only focusing on USB decoding ?
 
Last edited:

Toku

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
2,435
Likes
2,839
Location
Japan
I've given up the dop option and i've concentrated on transcoding DSD to WAV over SPDIF using dsf:wav24
It works but
When using dsf:wav24;192,i play a DSD file and Bubble upnp displays WAV 192kHz 24bits but he M500 is displayig 96kHz. I don't inderstand.
If i play a 192kHz FLAC file, the M500 displays 96kHz as well.

By the way, do you guys think the M500 Optical input quality is good.
Are the M500 test only focusing on USB decoding ?
I think that the trouble of various problems is the enjoyment of digital audio!

I also tested the M500's COAX / OPT connection, but I don't feel the difference with the USB connection.
 

Mamoles

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Messages
40
Likes
12
Location
Paris
I think that the trouble of various problems is the enjoyment of digital audio!

I also tested the M500's COAX / OPT connection, but I don't feel the difference with the USB connection.

Thanks for your USB feedback.
I quite like your answer about digital audio.
It took me several weeks in order to solve all problems with my NAS, Minimserver, Bubble Upnp server, Lumin and open home renderers.
Switched from my Shield TV (because of the poor upsampling done through the USB output) to the Chromecast audio with optical output.
Now, i'm dealing with Minimstreamer transcoding.
I learn a lot, but it is really frustrating.
If you've got a few hints for me in order to improve, i would be very happy !
Really upset about this display weirdness.
 
Last edited:

laurelkurt

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 7, 2019
Messages
132
Likes
59
Location
Rochester, NY
This is a review and detailed measurements of the SMSL M500 Balanced DAC and integrated headphone amplifier. It was kindly sent to me by the company although a number of members had offered the same. The M500 costs US $399 on Amazon including free shipping.

The M500 takes on the form of rectangular cube which I kind of like here:



The display font as well as the one in the manual are quite tiny. Fortunately when you change the volume, it switches to larger font in the center which I appreciated.

The volume control feels good if a bit small.

The back panel shows the good stuff as far as inclusion of XLR output:

The figure 8 power cable is not as optimal as an IEC connector but does make for a lighter weight cord.

After about an hour of use the enclosure was barely above room temperature so no issues there. Usage on Windows 10 was plug and play as is thankfully common.

The same generic remote control that ships from Chinese hifi companies comes with this unit. Be sure to press "C" to activate it. The Fn key toggles between line out and headphone out.

I was asked about MQA decoding. I found it work excellently, matching what my Roon player was reporting. By default Roon was allowing it to both decode and render MQA which is the way it should be. I hunted for 192 kHz MQA content and found this on Tidal from one of my favorite signals, James Taylor:
View attachment 37183

The display on M500 showed the correct setting:

View attachment 37184

Translating for others who don't follow MQA, the backwards compatible in the clear format is 48 kHz. The hidden bits allow the DAC to decode this back up to 192 kHz sampling.

As a side note and a nice touch, any time you play something with > 44.1 kHz sample rate, the display shows the "High-Res" logo which in its gold coloring, looks good.

So really, other than tiny fonts on the display, there is not much to complain about and a lot to like on the M500.

DAC Audio Measurements
As usual let's separate out the DAC performance from headphone amplifier and see what we have:
View attachment 37185

I was pleasantly surprised to see a high output of nearly 7 volts at max volume. For fairness to other DACs measured, I cut the output down to 4.3 volt. Our worst case distortion product is below -120 dB, assuring complete transparency as that is well below our threshold of hearing. Same is true of SINAD which sums in the noise with it and still lands in truly inaudible distortion+noise.

No wonder then that the M500 ranks way up in our DAC ratings based on SINAD:
View attachment 37186

RCA performance is almost as good:
View attachment 37189

Dynamic range (measured using AES-17 standard) is superb even with the volume turned down to 4.3 volts:

View attachment 37187

Intermodulation distortion relative to input level was excellent as well:

View attachment 37188

Jitter performance is extremely good:
View attachment 37190

The few bits show up due to very low noise floor.

Linearity was perfection in a graph with either output:
View attachment 37191

You can expect our 32-tone test to also show up well and it did:
View attachment 37192

Here is our usual filter responses:

View attachment 37193

Attenuation was extremely good with some of these, necessitating me lowering the limit in the graph to see the floor! You have a choice of no less than three filters that truncate well by the required 22.05 kHz bandwidth of 44.1 kHz sampled audio.

Finally, THD+N versus frequency shows one clean DAC when it comes to ultrasonic spectrum of noise and distortion:
View attachment 37194

Headphone Amplifier Measurements
Let's change our connection to headphone amplifier (while driving the unit digitally) and see what we have. Let's start with signal to noise ratio:

View attachment 37195

We lose good bit of our performance through the headphone amplifier. The low output of 50 millivolt which aims to measure the noise level for sensitive IEMs is a bit above average:

View attachment 37196

Hopefully that lowers the probability of hissing with those transducers.

Let's get into most important measurements which is noise and distortion relative to power starting with 300 ohm:

View attachment 37197

We have very good noise and distortion relative to our reference, the Topping DX3 Pro. Alas, we fall short of its output power though, stopping at 63 milliwatts. I like to see 100 milliwatts or more to make it more future proof in case you use higher impedance headphones.

Here is the same for 33 ohm:
View attachment 37198

Now we match the Topping so we are in better shape, especially given the low noise and distortion.

Headphone Listening Tests
I started my testing with Drop's Ether CX Mr. Speakers headphones. Here, I had plenty of volume but could stand playing at max volume. It was loud to be sure but I like to see more headroom than I had. That aside, performance was very good and clean to max volume as the measurements above show (i.e. lack of clipping).

I had a bit less headroom with Sennheiser HD-650 with less ability for "skull resonance" than I like to see. :) Fidelity otherwise was excellent though. To wit, I am still listening to the M500 using the HD-650 as I type this. Typically a good sign that I like what I am hearing.

Conclusions
SMSL packs just about every desired feature into a DAC and headphone amplifier including MQA decoding with great measured and subjective performance. The only weakness is that its amplifier doesn't blow your ear drums.

On the performance front, it is heart warming to see companies like SMSL continuing to refine the performance of their product, lowering noise and distortion in every way they can. We have seen this progress in just a year or so. All of this comes with no premium to us as consumers. And give us products that can be proven to be transparent to the source music. You hear what was given to you by the talent and production/mastering engineers with no molestation of said bits. Puts a smile on my face from just typing these words!

Given the features, performance and low price, it is my pleasure to put SMSL M500 on my recommended list.

--------
As always, questions, comments, corrections, etc. are welcome.

With the cooling weather, I am thinking of going to the bay and digging up some clams. That part is free. What is not is the wine and spices we need to steam them. So I appreciate any donation to make this possible using : https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
I recently found ASR and joined. I purchased a Topping D10 on your recommendation; to place between my streaming laptop and my KEF LS50Ws. I got all kinds of pops/clicks through their terrible USB input. Thanks, problem solved! I'm not a tech head, but appreciate these reviews and all the commentary, even if I don't understand some of it. I would love to see a review of the NAD c 658 streamer/preamp as I'm really interested in its bass management and Dirac room correction. Thanks again sir.
 

Charles0322

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2019
Messages
36
Likes
23
Location
Montreal Quebec Canada
I think I can hear very, very subtle differences between several of them (fast linear and apodizing is the combo the sounds most different to me).

I would not bet much money on my ability to discern differences blind.
if you activate the filters while playing an MQA they will engage.. otherwise it is no difference at ALL on all other material.. I think they made a mistake in production.. the mistake being the filter circuit should be disengaged on MQA, on my unit it is disengaged on all other material EXCEPT MQA, which is too bad.. although, filters are of little importance to me.. and I just use the default one when playing MQA, but maybe this defect is only with some of the units?
 

Charles0322

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2019
Messages
36
Likes
23
Location
Montreal Quebec Canada
I had Chord Mojo and SMSL M500 for two weeks and compare them with different headphones. And I was owner for chord mojo for 2 years and I know this dac from my heart.

I have these headphone:
- DT990 pro 250Ohm
- Mr.Speaker AEON C
- Shure IEM 535

And let me summarize my test for M500 and Mojo but before that what surprise me that shure 535 was able to show me more clearly how they sound different.

M500 simply destroys Mojo in sound quality.
- More transparency
- Better dynamic
- Details seems more in m500 and that maybe because it is more transparent.
- Sound stage and channel separation way better and wider and more accurate of sound position from far left to far right.
- Maybe and I'm not sure that M500 has better bass decay with Mr.speaker Aeon C.

The difficult thing was to level match them and to evaluate them and I tend to increase mojo sound level to check if that will show better dynamic or more details but that was not the case, m500 always sound better and the sound structure still intact and well control at any volume level.

I used ROON and grope zone theme to send the usb signal to mojo and m500 at the same time so I switch my headphone in 1 second between them without interruption.

What surprised me M500 sound filter: they didn't change the sound at all and I think SMSL playes with us ?!!!!!!
Last surprise when I connect both M500 and Mojo to external amplifier Gilmore MK2 lite which has input switch and I can compre M500 and Mojo in 0.01 sec. The Gilmore sound signature dominate the listing and both m500 and mojo sound so close and I barely hear a different.
try the filters while using an MQA file and you will hear them engage..
 

Mamoles

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Messages
40
Likes
12
Location
Paris
Thanks for your USB feedback.
I quite like your answer about digital audio.
It took me several weeks in order to solve all problems with my NAS, Minimserver, Bubble Upnp server, Lumin and open home renderers.
Switched from my Shield TV (because of the poor upsampling done through the USB output) to the Chromecast audio with optical output.
Now, i'm dealing with Minimstreamer transcoding.
I learn a lot, but it is really frustrating.
If you've got a few hints for me in order to improve, i would be very happy !
Really upset about this display weirdness.

Just in case it could be useful for some, i just read that Chromecast Audio supports 24/96 optical output only.
Have a nice day.
 

Charles0322

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2019
Messages
36
Likes
23
Location
Montreal Quebec Canada
How are you confirming this? I hear the quiet pop changing filters in MQA mode...but that doesn't necessarily mean "engaged".
Well when I toggle through filters on any material other than MQA there are no audible differences. Some have claimed that the filters don’t do anything.. if you try the filters when playing MQA all of a sudden they change the sound. It’s easy to hear the “albeit” slight differences in the filters this way but impossible to hear any difference for me on anything but MQA
 

strangeskies

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
Messages
50
Likes
65
Well when I toggle through filters on any material other than MQA there are no audible differences. Some have claimed that the filters don’t do anything.. if you try the filters when playing MQA all of a sudden they change the sound. It’s easy to hear the “albeit” slight differences in the filters this way but impossible to hear any difference for me on anything but MQA

That sounds like a problem with your specific unit.
 
Top Bottom