I kind of did, but he didnt really say anything unknown, and the worst part is that none of what he said is a valid point against good measuring gear.
The gist of what he says is that your brain constructcs the mental "image" of sound from time queues and differences in amplitude between different parts of a sound wave, and he is not wrong there. What he doesnt seem to understand is that that happens AFTER the audio gear has done its job of making an electrical singnal into a sound wave, and its that process where good measurements are important, since thats how we measure fidelity to the recorded signal.
He tried to sound smart by repeating something he really doesnt understand well.