Better dynamics / headroom, that's why I do it. Especially if you have robust subs to handle < 80hz.If high-passing to subs at 80Hz, 24dB/oct., any reason not to go with the F206 over the F208? Running M106 now.
Better dynamics / headroom, that's why I do it. Especially if you have robust subs to handle < 80hz.If high-passing to subs at 80Hz, 24dB/oct., any reason not to go with the F206 over the F208? Running M106 now.
If high-passing to subs at 80Hz, 24dB/oct., any reason not to go with the F206 over the F208? Running M106 now.
That looks like an excellent in room response prediction.I am a non-expert at comparing specs. But, on FR alone, all other things being equal (which they probably won't be) should I assume these representative tower speakers should/could compare favorably to the F208's?
View attachment 279366
In this room and (fixed of necessity) seating position I've found it's better to let my subs handle below 80Hz. The speakers also sound better to me, perhaps due to lower IMD as well as THD. Even 120Hz works well given how they're located.Is it a limitation of the associated gear that you can’t choose a lower crossover point?
What about LX Bookshelf?The graphs are of the Ascend Acoustics Sierra Ribbon Tower V2:
![]()
SIERRA TOWER V2 PAIR
Introducing our new V2 Tower "The midrange on the Towers...is a main event. Inner detail is fantastic even on large-ensemble recordings, and they are free from distortion and retain a hefty amount of dynamic headroom when played at spirited levels." -Enjoy the Music.com Combining the most...ascendacoustics.com
Then maybe with that high of a crossover you could save some money and go with the F206. I sure absolutely love my F208, and haven’t heard the smaller F206 — but I’d wager that the bigger difference is from 60Hz down between the speakers.In this room and (fixed of necessity) seating position I've found it's better to let my subs handle below 80Hz. The speakers also sound better to me, perhaps due to lower IMD as well as THD. Even 120Hz works well given how they're located.
Thanks! Then there's the outlier candidate the Concerta2 F36 which seems to still measure pretty well and be ahead of the F206 dynamically. Nice sale price too, admittedly.Then maybe with that high of a crossover you could save some money and go with the F206. I sure absolutely love my F208, and haven’t heard the smaller F206 — but I’d wager that the bigger difference is from 60Hz down between the speakers.
Though, it’s possible that e.g. the bigger mass of the F208, or the “ease” that larger woofers would have to the sound, would translate to details in midrange clarity etc.. But if you could listen to them side by side in a showroom, that could give you some definite answers.
This is ASR where speculation doesn't count for much.wish Amir would test Revel sub. I'll bet low distortion.
You want low distortion, get the biggest sucker or 4 that will fit in your room with lots of power.Revel speakers stand out with low distortion. I wish Amir would test Revel sub. I'll bet low distortion. I don't like subs I have purchased including Rythmic and Infinity. I detect distortion painfully with perforated ear drum since childhood. I keep reading that 10% distortion below 40 hz is undetectable. Try that with a screwed up ear drum.
Have you tried JL audio? Very clean sounding.Revel speakers stand out with low distortion. I wish Amir would test Revel sub. I'll bet low distortion. I don't like subs I have purchased including Rythmic and Infinity. I detect distortion painfully with perforated ear drum since childhood. I keep reading that 10% distortion below 40 hz is undetectable. Try that with a screwed up ear drum.
I was looking back at Amir's distortion figures of Revels. High end speakers vanishing low and low end speakers real good. I suspect measurements of Revel subs might beat the internet wonders significantly.You want low distortion, get the biggest sucker or 4 that will fit in your room with lots of power.
All the marketing BS aside, you can't change the laws of physics.
My Rythmic distorts about same as all the others. I turned it off.This is ASR where speculation doesn't count for much.
Nothing in the Revel published SW specs that would make one assume they would outperform a Rhythmik sub. Quite the contrary in fact.
Don’t know about Revel subwoofers. But their [LINK=“https://www.crutchfield.com/p_265B1102WA/Revel-Performa3-B110v2-High-Gloss-Walnut.html”]single customer review[/LINK] on Crutchfield’s website is a one star review.I was looking back at Amir's distortion figures of Revels. High end speakers vanishing low and low end speakers real good. I suspect measurements of Revel subs might beat the internet wonders significantly.
I wouldnt say so, at least not as an end statement. This is the distortion plots of the JTR RS1, it has distortion under control under high output.I was looking back at Amir's distortion figures of Revels. High end speakers vanishing low and low end speakers real good. I suspect measurements of Revel subs might beat the internet wonders significantly.
If your subwoofer badly distorts there are 3 likely reasons.My Rythmic distorts about same as all the others. I turned it off.
Based on this, it appears that Revel subs are not the best value. https://www.musicdirect.com/equipme...lZMAHHue-kaGrNWoQq6O518E8bUwesRxoC5G0QAvD_BwEI was looking back at Amir's distortion figures of Revels. High end speakers vanishing low and low end speakers real good. I suspect measurements of Revel subs might beat the internet wonders significantly.