• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Open Baffle speakers

Adi777

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Apr 14, 2022
Messages
689
Likes
458
Hi. For some time now I have been reading a lot about OB loudspeakers, i.e. Open Baffles. Are they really special, as their owners claim?
I often hear the description of the incredible naturalness of the sound from such loudspeakers. Is it really so? If so, could it be related to "no housing"?
Any of you listened to such constructions? If so, what impression did they make on you?
What potential disadvantages can Open Baffle have?
Regards
 
Last edited:

zvukofor

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2018
Messages
22
Likes
39
Location
Armenia
Hi.
Indeed, they are in their own class for their qualities.

Incredible "naturalness" is just a trick with our perception. Due to the fact that open baffle speakers radiate in figure-8 pattern, filling room with a sound, our brain can ignore room acoustics/reflections much easier, just as it does with natural acoustic sources. Plus, again due to figure-8 open baffles has less problems with bass - room modes are less excited - less boomy sound... and no enclosure resonanses really helps too.
So, it is not a mystery, but pure physics/acoustics.

Disadvantages: much less effective system, need baffle step correction to flatten LF range and correction for acoustic short circuit effects — lot of technical problems to solve, but in reality almost as much as for closed/vented boxes. Also, can't put'em close to walls...

For more technical explanations and research please read materials by Siegfried Linkwitz, who dedicated a lot of his life to high fidelity and natural-sounding speaker systems.

I was really impressed by all effects of open baffles almost 10 years ago, then built my own speakers, really love'em and still use it daily, even for my job - music production / sound engineering. Open baffles are the first speakers i've heard that reproduced double bass as it should sound.
 
OP
Adi777

Adi777

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Apr 14, 2022
Messages
689
Likes
458
Disadvantages: much less effective system, need baffle step correction to flatten LF range and correction for acoustic short circuit effects — lot of technical problems to solve, but in reality almost as much as for closed/vented boxes. Also, can't put'em close to walls...
Can such loudspeakers be successfully integrated with subwoofers? If yes, should the subwoofers also be Open Baffle or not necessarily?
 

zvukofor

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2018
Messages
22
Likes
39
Location
Armenia
Can such loudspeakers be successfully integrated with subwoofers? If yes, should the subwoofers also be Open Baffle or not necessarily?
Definitely, if main units do not work in full range.
IMO open baffle subwoofers are much better than boxes, because of radiation pattern. Less modes excited, as i've told before, so - much more defined bass.
 

DVDdoug

Major Contributor
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
2,918
Likes
3,831
Can such loudspeakers be successfully integrated with subwoofers? If yes, should the subwoofers also be Open Baffle or not necessarily?
Generally you need an enclosure for deep bass.

Speaker design is always a trade-off...

The soundwaves from the back of the speaker are out-of-phase with the front, so they tend to cancel, especially at low-frequencies which have longer wavelengths.

I've seen pictures of multiple large subwoofers in an open baffle configuration but most subs (and most speakers) have a cabinet.

A ported cabinet is normally "tuned" to extend the low frequency cutoff lower than what you'd get with the same sealed box (or an open baffle). But there are trade-offs and a sealed box normally rolls-off more-slowly so they can sometimes go lower.

I've never heard of a studio monitor that wasn't sealed or in a ported cabinet. You probably won't find any open baffles in your local audio-video store either.
 
Last edited:

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,191
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
To a noob, all these choices may be infinitely baffling.

/I'll let myself out.
 

Waxx

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 12, 2021
Messages
1,931
Likes
7,688
Location
Wodecq, Hainaut, Belgium
Generally you need an enclosure for deep bass.

Speaker design is always a trade-off...

The soundwaves from the back of the speaker are out-of-phase with the front, so they tend to cancel, especially at low-frequencies which have longer wavelengths.

I've seen pictures of multiple large subwoofers in an open baffle configuration but most subs (and most speakers) have a cabinet.

A ported cabinet is normally "tuned" to extend the low frequency cutoff lower than what you'd get with the same sealed box (or an open baffle). But there are trade-offs and a sealed box normally rolls-off more-slowly so they can sometimes go lower.

I've never heard of a studio monitor that wasn't sealed or in a ported cabinet. You probably won't find any open baffles in your local audio-video store either.
Not really true, there are OB like systems like a Ripole or a slot loaded OB subwoofer that give deep bass without a real cabinet. But they are hard to tune right and need higher order crossovers so most use sealed subs and dsp to get it more or less right.
 

Waxx

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 12, 2021
Messages
1,931
Likes
7,688
Location
Wodecq, Hainaut, Belgium
Whether a dipole speaker needs a dipole sub is...complicated, and whether one or the other is better depends on the modes in your room. A monopole sub can "pressurize a room" and take advantage of room gain.
See:
That is just a thing many with OB's try to avoid. And i have to say it sounds good for the right kind of music (more acoustic music).

But i'm a dubhead also and I need a lot of pressure on the bass. And so do many who listen to electric or electronic music. So it's not everybody's cup of tea for sure. I could use an OB sub, but not as the only option, only for some kinds of music i listen to (jazz, classical, ...)
 

suttondesign

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 4, 2019
Messages
732
Likes
1,310
Location
Bellingham, WA
I discussed this yesterday:

 

ctrl

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 24, 2020
Messages
1,616
Likes
6,086
Location
.de, DE, DEU

kemmler3D

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 25, 2022
Messages
3,008
Likes
5,612
Location
San Francisco
I would say subjectively OB speakers are less susceptible to being "wrecked" by a bad room. I still remember hearing some martin logan electrostatic speakers in the suites at an audio show. Compared to all the box speakers (which suffered badly from the not-so-good sounding rooms) they sounded pretty clear and natural. I think because the sound is scattered more evenly and you get a smooth but highly indirect response in the room, you ironically hear more of the speaker and less of the room in many cases. When the speaker is any good, this tends to be a good thing.

I think box speakers can beat OB speakers on many dimensions, but it's harder for them to overcome directivity and room issues, where OB speakers kinda cut the gordian knot and sidestep a lot of the design challenges of box speakers.

The soundstage you get is not the same, but many people prefer it.
 
OP
Adi777

Adi777

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Apr 14, 2022
Messages
689
Likes
458
That is just a thing many with OB's try to avoid. And i have to say it sounds good for the right kind of music (more acoustic music).

But i'm a dubhead also and I need a lot of pressure on the bass. And so do many who listen to electric or electronic music. So it's not everybody's cup of tea for sure. I could use an OB sub, but not as the only option, only for some kinds of music i listen to (jazz, classical, ...)
Why acoustic music, or jazz and classic, but not electronic for example?
What if the OB speakers are very large, with a couple, for example 2-4 18 inch woofers on one side for the lowest bass plus 2-4 12 inch for the upper bass?
 

roog

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 13, 2020
Messages
369
Likes
397
Location
UK, Keynsham
I don't have the facility to test speakers, but I did build a large stereo pair of 3 way open baffle speakers, comprising: 2 x 15" bass + 1 x 8" mid + 1 x 27mm treble in each speaker. I used DSP active crossovers and six way power amp driving each driver separately.

15E32AB9-374B-4D8E-B9A1-BA25049C3430.jpeg

I was aware of the 'comb' filtering effect of the modest baffle, IMO anything short of 'too big' is too small to be useful!

I did not think much of the sound in a normal room environment, lack of bass, as anticipated, but also lack of sound stage (stereo effect), they had a mono like presentation. I had them in store in a small box room and tried them in there for fun and found that in a near field, (1 metre away arrangement), these huge speakers improved the stereo effect! I assume that the contributions from the back of the baffle became less important under these circumstances.

It would be interesting to see a proper test of this type of speaker as mathematically and to my ears they are a flawed concept, unless you are able to accommodate a very large baffle to prevent cancellation lower down the registers.
 
Last edited:
OP
Adi777

Adi777

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Apr 14, 2022
Messages
689
Likes
458
very large baffle
Yes, this is very interesting to me. How such a huge OB can sound with professional acoustics and perfectly placed in the room.
 

Gorgonzola

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 27, 2021
Messages
1,017
Likes
1,398
Location
Southern Ontario
Hi. For some time now I have been reading a lot about OB loudspeakers, i.e. Open Baffles. Are they really special, as their owners claim?
I often hear the description of the incredible naturalness of the sound from such loudspeakers. Is it really so? If so, could it be related to "no housing"?
Any of you listened to such constructions? If so, what impression did they make on you?
What potential disadvantages can Open Baffle have?
Regards
Pardon me but these are my impressions only, I'm not an acoustic or speaker design expert.

I ran Magneplanar "panel" speakers for about 15 years and enjoyed them very much. I used a vented box subwoofer with my Magneplanars with no problems of integration. Given that lower frequencies, (below, say, 80 Hz), are effectively omni-directional, I personally have never been persuaded of any special merit to OB bass. That is, OB bass requires more complex design in order to chase a problem that doesn't really exist.

As you probably know, the Magneplanars are flat panel, dipole speakers that produce the discussed "figure 8" dispersion pattern. At lower frequencies, (which have longer wave lengths), the out-of-phase front & rear waves tend to cancel out, a tendency that becomes complete at some low frequency.

OB designs with pretentions to deeper bass aim to cancel the cancellation phenomenon by employing very wide front baffles and/or side extensions that are wider than the wave lengths are long. (Pardon me, this explanation is a bit simplistic but, I think, fundamentally valid.) The Magneplanar speakers do not have these extra extensions.
 
Last edited:

kongwee

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 22, 2022
Messages
1,024
Likes
276
I used to have a Martin Logan, it is easier to make the speaker "disappear". I did audit the maggie too. I believe OB could do that if you have room to play around. You could hear the box resonate on conventional loudspeaker if you own one. Of course, there are box speaker out here that has lower box resonance but at high price. ML nowadays are $15k. Add a few thousand you can get very good box speaker that don't ring that much.
 
Top Bottom