It's off-topic, so I'll try to limit my comments...Oh dang. Thank you so much for that! Saves me from buying another one!
I also have some hearing loss on my right ear. I have tried separate L/R EQ, and although I may discover some "new" soundstage clues, it's not that simple... I think my brain somewhat compensates for that right hearing loss, and if I try to R-EQ it, it sounds weird... So mixed results for me
One complain about the Q5K implementation: the independent L/R is only available in the "SPK EQ" tab. That's the section where you would EQ your HP/IEM to a "target", one that mostly works for you, and compensate for any L/R imbalance of the transducers as needed. It's also where the "AUTO EQ PRESET" are applied if you choose to use that option -- All logical up to that point.
What is not quite logical is to use that "SPK EQ" tab to compensate for hearing L/R imbalance. The "USR EQ" tab is where you would EQ your personal preferences from the "target" you've been using using. So, the process should go like this: EQ the considered HP/IEM to "target" > SPK EQ. Correct measured L/R HP/IEM imbalance > SPK EQ. Adjust personal preference on top of the "target" > USR EQ. Correct L/R hearing imbalance > ??? SPK EQ ??? Why? This should be doable in the USR EQ section, it's not related to the HP/IEM but to the user....
I submitted a change request in the Qudelix forum, but I don't think it got much traction. This is an example where Neutron could make a difference if they wanted to implement a similar, separate USER / HW EQ....... Granted it's probably a minor topic!