• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

JDS Synapse & Neutron V1 USB Isolators Review

Rate these USB Isolators:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 9 6.7%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 46 34.1%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 80 59.3%

  • Total voters
    135

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
46,419
Likes
260,624
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and detailed measurements of the JDS Labs Synapse and Neutron Hifi V1 USB isolators. They were both sends to me by the respected companies. Synapse costs US $69, and Neutron US $118.
Neutron V1 USB Isolation vs JDS Synapse FFT noise Stereo Audio Review.jpg

As you see, the styles are very different. Synapse comes in a playful red color. Neutron in a more serious case, resembling a USB power supply.

Some background: USB bus carries data, power and ground. Data is used by all downstream devices naturally (e.g. DACs). Power may or may not be used. The ground however, is always used as the reference for both data and power. Being normally connected to an active and high power computing device, USB ground and power can both be quite polluted. As can the data lines. If you are using balanced output in your downstream device (again, such as DAC), there is little import to this. However, if you are using unbalanced RCA connection, the noise on the USB ground can travel through the DAC and manifest itself as noise and ground loop. How much this happens, and how audible it is, is complex and not predictable. Suffice it to say, once it becomes audible, you are kind of stuck, having to possibly change your computing device, DAC or other games to try to hopefully eliminate such noise. It can be quite frustrating.

A USB isolator such as the ones being reviewed here, have two USB connections: an input and and output. They are electrically isolated from each other so have the potential to solve the noise problem above. Some expensive DACs have an isolator inside but I would say 99% do not.

Both of these isolators also regenerate the USB power. In the case of Synapse, you are only provided 100 milliamps whereas Neutron V1 passes through 400 milliamps. Further, it accepts power over micro-USB which can augment what it can produce. To the extent you have USB powered devices, the Neutron may work better depending on power consumption of the device.

Testing such devices is difficult. I could create an artificial ground loop but that would not be representative of real life situations. Fortunately, I just reviewed the JDS Element IV DAC and HP Amp which due to inclusion of its own AC power adapter, objectively shows the noise transmitted over USB. So I am going to use that for analysis of how well these isolators work.

USB Isolator Measurements
Let's first look at the dashboard of Element IV with direct USB connection:
JDS Labs Synapse USB Isolation Stereo Audio without measurements.png

I can always tell leakage of computer noise in the dense spectrum it creates in the FFT spectrum, top right. That noise while unlikely to be audible, adds up to the same level as distortion specs so we don't want that. Please note that I am seeing this with my Audio Analyzer which has floating input, i.e. its "RCA" connection is not grounded. When faced with this situation, I usually resort to different ways of grounding the analyzer to device being tested. Unless the noise is internal to the device itself, I am usually able to reduce it fair bit as is the case here:

JDS Labs Synapse USB Isolation Stereo Audio without but with grounding measurements.png

Notice how a lot of that hash is gone in high frequencies. But we still have a tilted up noise floor in lower frequencies. SINAD is improved by 2 or so dB.

Now let's connect JDS Sypanse inline with the USB connection (now without grounding):
JDS Labs Synapse USB Isolation Stereo Audio measurements.png


We see complete clean up of the noise floor with SINAD elevating 2 to 3 dB yet again.

I replaced Synapse with Neutron V1 and performance improvement was the same (there are tiny run to run variations):
Neutron V1 USB Isolation Stereo Audio measurements.png


We can zoom into the noise floor without the signal present:
Neutron V1 USB Isolation vs JDS Synapse FFT noise Stereo Audio measurements.png


Please ignore the differences in mains noise. That is again, nature of the floating analyzer input. If I use both Synapse and grounding, that gets almost eliminated:
JDS Labs Synapse USB Isolation Stereo Audio Grounded measurements.png


Conclusions
Of all the devices I test, I say around 5 to 10% of time I run into noise issues. Per my explanation above, I am usually able to reduce their impact to be negligible. But in a few cases, I have failed to do so. You might say that is significant but my analyzer is not 100% stand in for whatever amplifier you use. You may have bigger or smaller problem or none. When hit with that issue, you can use Toslink optical but that may not exist in your source. And at any rate, Toslink is usually limited to 96 kHz sampling. With either one of these isolators, you can get maximum performance using USB bus and eliminate any dependence on the source.

I am happy to recommend both JDS Synapse and Neutron V1 USB isolators. Both function very well and are reasonably priced.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 
Last edited:
Reserved for @AdamG to kindly post the specs.

Manufacturer Specifications:

- JDS Labs Synapse:

IMG_0949.jpeg


- Neutron Hifi V1 USB isolators:

IMG_0950.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you are using balanced output in your downstream DAC (again, such as DAC), there is little import to this.

Hey @amirm thanks for reviewing these devices!
One thing I did not understand was the above quote. There seems to be some accidental double-DAC'ing perhaps?
 
There was a review of the UpTone ISO Regen back in 2017:

Archimago also measured Topping HS01.

And Topping HS02.

And Intona.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Amir!

Is it a myth or no that ferrite beads can isolate a USB cable for 1$ ?
 
Is it a myth or no that ferrite beads can isolate a USB cable for 1$ ?
They provide no isolation. And the filtering they do is only effective at much higher frequencies, hundreds of Kilohertz whereas these products are operating in audio band.
 
It should also be noted that the APX-555B does not have its own USB isolation. I would expect the forthcoming APX-555C (I made that up) will have one built in. :)

The issue of course is current ability. 100mA is dongle level. 400mA is small D/A level with no features. Consider 400mA at 5VDC is only 2W.
 
Last edited:
Interesting test, thanks Amir. Three things spring to mind:

1. Does this mean that AES/EBU digital connections improve performance in this manner over spdif?
2. Can a USB isolator improve jitter performance with a USB input?
3. Will a USB isolator improve performance when a USB source is connected but another source is selected and active?
 
Thanks for testing this.

I wonder how I could measure my Topping HS01 and HS02 in a way that could compare with this... without having to purchase the JDS...

Would that work if we compare with a cheap Apple USB C instead ?

(Well, to be fair, this is more a qualitative test than a quantitative one, so that probably dies not matter)
 
Given that these isolation devices are fairly small and require only a few components, why don't DACs include an isolation circuit on their USB input.

It might not work for a dongle, but their should be enough space on a desktop DACs PCB to include it.
 
Does optical isolation have any advantages over this isolation?
 
Does optical isolation have any advantages over this isolation?
Simplicity over using another box and optical cables can be run parallelle to high voltage cables without issues so it can be a good solution if you're running power and signal through a channel in the wall.
 
Given that these isolation devices are fairly small and require only a few components, why don't DACs include an isolation circuit on their USB input.

It might not work for a dongle, but their should be enough space on a desktop DACs PCB to include it.
I'm the weirdo who suggests that all the time even if I don't have a problem (to this day,you never know)
Some thankfully do include isolation.

Thanks Amir!
 
400mA is small D/A level with no features. Consider 400mA at 5VDC is only 2W.

In my personal usage scenario I keep Isolator V1 between DAP (iBasso DX 220 or 160) and PC and it is sufficient to keep DAP not discharging and it is also keeps charging if was discharged. Therefore 0.4A is quite enough for general usage scenario but of course you need to check specs of the connected device and its max power consumption.

For more power (above 0.4A) Isolator V1 has Micro-USB connector (mentioned in the review) via which you can provide additional 5V power. In this case USB port will still be isolated but your power adaptor shall be isolated too (normally mobile phone charger is ok).
 
So let me get this right... You buy a piece of equipment to make the inaudible noise even more inaudible? Am I missing something here?
These isolators can get rid of very much audible mains hum, GPU whine, and other ground loop induced noises.

If you don't have such issues, then an isolator is pointless.

If you do, then they're an effective solution.
 
Last edited:
So let me get this right... You buy a piece of equipment to make the inaudible noise even more inaudible? Am I missing something here?
I used the Intona high speed isolators they aren’t foo but I only found one case ( a very poorly designed dac ) where they made an audible difference.
Well designed equipment XLR connections job done.
Keith
 
Back
Top Bottom