• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

My "Hifi" Journey & Informal Genelec 8030c vs KEF HTS-3001 Comparision in Midfield

vsch

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 9, 2025
Messages
24
Likes
33
Introduction

This is my first post after I have been reading and benefiting from this forum for roughly two years.

I am no trained listener, and I listen to music purely for pleasure. Thus, everything I post should probably be taken with a grain of salt. Nevertheless, my impressions and conclusions may be helpful to someone with a similar profile, who deliberates about buying a system for pleasure listening without spending an outrageous amount of money.

Background

As my desktop system, I have a pair of Genelec 8030c speakers, an Arendal 1961 1s subwoofer, and a minidsp Flex, which I bought roughly two years ago after a lot of reading on this forum. I listen to this system nearfield at my desk (speakers on desk stands about 80cm / 2.6ft away) in an untreated home office (12m2 / 130 sq ft). I don’t use Dirac, since I wanted to learn how to manually accomplish room correction with REW and a UMIK-1. This system sound amazing and delivers the best sound I’ve ever heard – in terms of delivered joy, it probably represents the best ~3’000 bucks I’ve spent in a long time.

In the living room, I have had a 5.1 system I bought roughly 20 years ago during my graduate studies. It consists of a KEF KHT-3001 set of speakers (non-SE version) on stands and (as the original HTB2 subwoofer gave up the ghost about 6 years ago) a SVS SB-1000 classic subwoofer with a Dayton DSP-LF to knock down the room modes. I listen to this system midfield (LCR are about 2.5m / 8.2 ft away, and the surrounds about 1.8 m / 5.9 ft) in an untreated room (about 50m2 / 540 sq ft). The RT60 time is ~600ms, so the room is lively and certainly far from optimal.

Recently, I replaced the 20-year-old Yamaha AVR with a Denon 3800h as I suspected that room correction would make a substantial difference, which it did. Built-in Audyssey XT32 already sounded much better than the old set up with only the Dayton DSP-LF for the sub. However, I now rely on the free and amazing A1 Neuron from OCA for room correction. I use it with a quasi-Harman target curve with 4db bass boost and Dynamic EQ on. It sounds way better than Audyssey XT32. In fact, the sound is so good that I restarted listening in the living room from time to time, which I nearly gave up after I bought the Genelecs for the nearfield desktop setup.

This got me thinking whether it would be worth upgrading my living room system and replacing the KEF eggs with Genelecs too (e.g., something like 3x 8340 for LCR and 2x 8330/8030 for sourround). However, I was unsure how big the difference would be, given that I would be listening in mid- instead of nearfield. So, before spending roughly 5k on new speakers and stands, I wanted to put the Genelec 8030c and KEF HTS-3001 into a horserace midfield in an untreated room with room correction.

Impression: Genelec 8030c vs KEF HTS-3001 (non-SE) in a 2.1 setup, midfield in an untreated room with room correction

Today, I finally tried out how the Genelec 8030c compare to the small KEF HTS-3001 in a 2.1 setup in my untreated living room roughly 2.5m / 8.2 ft away from the listening position. I placed the Genelecs next to the KEFs at roughly the same height and applied room correction using A1 Neuron. (Since the Denon 3800 has two presets, I could quickly switch between the Genelecs and the KEFs and keep them roughly level matched).

To my surprise, the subjective difference between the KEF eggs and the Genelecs is rather marginal. Objectively, the Genelec 8030c seem to be far superior, but I can only hear a clear difference between them and the KEFs in passages involving hi-hats or complex high-pitched synths. Overall, I can hardly tell them apart in this midfield setting in an untreated room and with A1 Neuron room correction & Dynamic EQ engaged.

Conclusions

Here are my conclusions from this comparison combined with my limited experience. Again, please take all of them (except maybe the first) with a grain of salt.

  • Amir and OCA are heroes. Without their contributions, I would still be stuck with mediocre sound and no clear path to improve.

  • Room correction makes a tremendous difference (at least in untreated rooms). I would never again use a system without it.

  • When it comes to (semi-)automatic room correction, A1 Neuron seems to be way superior to Audyssey XT32 and still relatively easy to use. I think OCA has several Youtube videos where he explains why it is so much better. I strongly recommend trying out A1 Neuron to anyone with a compatible Denon/Marantz AVR (if bass is too weak afterward, turning on Dynamic EQ helps).

  • Nearfield: it is possible to get amazing full-range sound with a 2.1 system in an untreated room. The combination of Genelec 8030c speakers, a hifi sub, and a minidsp Flex with REW works great for such an application. I suppose similar setups based on Genelec/Neumann and their proprietary room correction would be great too and easier to setup.

  • Midfield: it seems possible to get good sound in an untreated room too – at least to a certain extent. Good room correction appears to be a must, and A1 Neuron is astonishing in that regard. However, the potential gains from better speakers seem to be exhausted fairly quickly (probably as one hears mostly reflected rather than direct sound). Not sure whether it is worth going much beyond a decent set of speakers (such as the KEF HTS-3001) in such an application, unless one needs more SPL.

  • Nearfield listening seems to be way better suited for focused listening and hearing details than midfield listening. If I could have just one system, it would be my nearfield desktop setup or something similar from Genelec or Neumann.

  • Apart from output capability, I cannot hear any difference between the Arendal 1961 1s and the SVS SB-1000 classic after they have been integrated, phase/time aligned, and room corrected. Hence, any decent sub seems to do the job, but good integration and room correction are crucial.

  • The Auro2d/3d upmixer is great fun :)
 
Last edited:
I can only hear a clear difference between them and the KEFs in passages involving hi-hats or complex high-pitched synths
Did you try any full-spectrum heavy/extreme genres? Something beefy with a lof of distortion guitars shows coloration (if there's some) like nothing else; uneven "resolution" and such problems can be found as well
 
I heard the most clear difference during the first ~20 seconds of "ZHU -- Intoxicate" and when the hi-hats set in at ~33s in "Anderholm -- Delirious" The 8030s sounded "more clear" than the KEFs.

On other tracks with vocals (such as "Billie Eilish -- Your Power", "Billie Eilish -- Bury a Friend", or "LP -- Other People") and on bass heavy EDM (like "KREAM -- Insterstellar") the difference was marginal at best to my untrained ears.

I know these tracks quite well, but I am not sure whether they are particularly well suited for hearing differences in speakers' quality.

Moreover, the sub was crossed over relatively high at 110 Hz for both the KEF eggs and the 8030s. A1 Neuron determined this frequency automatically as the best crossover point. (It probably chose such a high crossover frequency, because I did the room correction for the full 5.1 setup incl. the HTS-3001 as surrounds when I put in the 8030s as LR.) The relief in the low bass region may be the reason why the KEF eggs kept up so well -- or maybe, I am simply not very talented at hearing and discerning subtle differences.

Anyways, since the 8030s sound amazing in nearfield use on my office desk, I expected them to outperform the small and 20-year-old KEF eggs by a wide margin when I brought them to the living room. To my surprise, this was not the case at all. The difference in perceived quality is way bigger (i) when I go from midfield (living room use) to nearfield (desktop use) with the 8030s or (ii) when I go from no room correction to Audyssey XT32 (much better) to A1 Neuron (again, much better).

I am not sure, but I start to believe that in an untreated room (with ****** 600ms RT60 time) at 2.5m / 8.2 ft listening distance, there is not much to gain with better speakers once one has reached a decent level of quality. Or in other words: If I want to get closer to the sound quality of the nearfield setup at my desk, I probably have to think less about speakers and more about room treatment.
 
Last edited:
Your experiment might also show that the 3001 series egg speakers are quite exceptional. Not as textbook perfect as your Genelecs but still really good indeed.
 
Yeah, probably. I think I read somewhere that they were the prototype for the first version of the coax used in the KEF Blades. No idea, whether thats' true though.

I was astonished by the fairly low THD during the 85db measurement swipes I took at 2.5m / 8.2 ft distance (see attached screenshots).

A set of used HTS-3001, a decent sub, a cheap Denon AVR (e.g. 1800h), and UMIK-1 plus REW & A1 Neuron probably make quite a good system with an amazing price-performance ratio, unless high SPL is required.
 
Here the screenshots of the measurement swipes of the FL & FR HTS-3001 at 2.5m / 8.2 ft before room correction via A1 Neuron (untreated room, RT60 ~600ms).

Front right:

fr_FR.png

distortion_FR.png


Front left:

fr_FL.png
distortion_FL.png
 
Last edited:
Sounds like a fun experiment. Good way to spend an afternoon.
 
Yeah, especially when the partner is out of town ;-) She would definitely laugh when she knew what I was up to.

However, it took way longer than anticipated, and I should get back to my real life...

Hope the results are useful to someone.
 
I heard the most clear difference during the first ~20 seconds of "ZHU -- Intoxicate" and when the hi-hats set in at ~33s in "Anderholm -- Delirious" The 8030s sounded "more clear" than the KEFs.

On other tracks with vocals (such as "Billie Eilish -- Your Power", "Billie Eilish -- Bury a Friend", or "LP -- Other People") and on bass heavy EDM (like "KREAM -- Insterstellar") the difference was marginal at best to my untrained ears.
To my ears testing on such "light" music is not very representative.
Iconic Roots by Sepultura is kinda closer to proper check. Nicely recorded self-titled Rage Against The Machine album or, say, My Arms, Your Hearse by Opeth are OK as well. Avoid remasters tho.
 
It's not about the bass at all, the midrange, the clarity and possible coloration of it is what bothers me the most.
Test wise Billie Eilish is still better than Diana Krall or Ghost Rider :facepalm: sure, yet it will sound pretty good on most speakers. But then may happen that you put on something like, lol, even teen pop metal such as Slipknot etc and - surprise - get a severe lack of resolution. If my playlist consisted mostly of Lana Del Rey-type stuff (actually, it's in there), I'd unlikely got (minor) audophilia vulgaris and ended up buying neutral/linear speakers :p But the closer the musical content gets to full-spectrum pink or white noise, the more obviously you can hear the issues (if there's some). Then I'd check what's with not only "good" but some "bad" tracks/recordings.

Also in OPs test with a subwoofer for both speakers bass is "solved" by default.
 
Last edited:
But the closer the musical content gets to full-spectrum pink or white noise, the more obviously you can hear the issues (if there's some).
You must first decide if your favoured music is closer to pink or white noise ;), in my experience material where heavy distortion is used as an artistic effect is not great for such.

Talking about it female pop rock music seems to work best next to pink noise:

 
Back
Top Bottom