• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

JVC XL-Z335 Review (1990 CD Player)

NTTY

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 27, 2018
Messages
518
Likes
2,022
Location
Switzerland
This is a review and detailed measurements of the JVC XL-Z335.

JVC XL-Z335_001.jpg



JVC XL-Z335 - Presentation

Released in 1990, this is quite an old CD Player. It was medium class player at reasonable price. At this time, JVC (Japan Victor Company) was still owned by Panasonic.

I’m not sure it shows on the above picture, but front face is full plastic and chassis is made of basic bent sheet metal, so nothing luxurious.

The back of the player is equally basic with non-gold-plated RCA output, but we find a digital output (coax only). There are additional sync outputs which allowed automatic recording level adjustment with a JVC cassette deck (connectors are present but internal circuitry absent for this lower level CD player):

JVC XL-Z335_002.jpg


This JVC Player is interesting because the drive and DAC are from JVC (Optima 5 and JCE4302 respectively). The DAC is a one bit type which was new at the time. This one bit conversion requires heavy processing to prevent quantizing noise due to the reduction from 16bits to 1bit. For that, JVC used its own Noise Shaping called VANS (Victor Advanced Noise Shaping). Even if the DAC chip is not so well documented, it still shows some additional advanced conversion principles. Indeed, it contains no less than 8 internal converters (4 by channel) to reduce noise. That was a nice architecture.

JVC XL-Z335_004.jpg


The drive is extremely fast and a real pleasure to use, good memories from old times.

Let’s see how all of this performs.


JVC XL-Z335 – Measurements (Analog out)

From now on, I will be consistent with my measurements as I described them on the Onkyo C-733 review. So over time, this will help comparing the items I reviewed.

The JVC outputs 1.88Vrms, a little below the standard 2Vrms. This would potentially make it sound dull when directly compared to another CD Player if the levels would not be matched.
First, the standard dashboard through 1kHz sine played at 0dBFS (left and right channels):

JVC XL-Z335_1kHz_0dBFS_LR.jpg


Both channels are represented but only one gets evaluated in that window. Right channel is a little less performing, but both are very similar.
This is anyway impressive performance for a 34 years old CD player! We have THD below -100dB and THD+N basically only limited by the dither noise present on the test CD. This is very good.
Note sideband distortion around the fundamental 1kHz sine, but at -120dBr they'll remain impossible to notice.

The ENOB, is shown at 15.7bits which is very close to the limit of what's recorded on my test CD, which contains dither, this is best in class (for a CD player).

You also noticed very low level power supply noise, again a good surprise for such an old player (completely stock):

JVC XL-Z335_PowerSupply_LR.jpg


Right channel has little more 50Hz (I live in Switzerland) and harmonics spuriae, but this is too low level to be heard. And by the way, this view shows that sideband spikes are power supply related (850Hz and 950Hz).

The bandwidth is flat and shows a small 0.8dB roll-off at 20kHz due to the oversampling filter. The two channels match at less than 0.1dB which is very good too:

JVC XL-Z335_BW_LR.jpg


When measuring the true SNR (from -60dBFS 1kHz sine without dither) I almost got the theoretical limit of CD Audio (97.2dB). Impressive for the time.

Coming back to oversampling filter, it shows a good and consistent attenuation, better than most of the time and even some of today:

JVC XL-Z335_Filter.jpg


This is an overlay with a triple tones to show the good attenuation of DA conversion images (80 to 90dB).
We also see the shape of the noise slowly increasing from 22kHz, this is the effect of the JVC noise shaping technique (VANS).

Let’s have a look at the multitones test to confirm the good performances:

JVC XL-Z335_Multitone.jpg


Nailed, more than 16bits of free distortion is guaranteed. This player will really be at ease when it comes to deliver nice music to your ears.

When it comes to Jitter, the JVC did not show any trace of it.

Last but not least, one of my favorite measurement, THD vs Frequency at -12dBFS:

JVC XL-Z335_THDvsFreq_-12dBFS.jpg


This is again best in class. I did not overlay my "reference" Onkyo C-733 because it's simply the same trace (plot at 1kHz showing -98dBr THD on 5 harmonics).


JVC XL-Z335 – Measurements (Digital out)

I will publish them in couple of days, as I lost my measurements after a crash and before saving. They showed no issue. It's a perfect transport.


Conclusion

This is a rather unknown player using a not so well documented proprietary DAC, and all for the best. I was really impressed when I first tested it, because it was the first player from 1990 that I tested to show near best in class performances.

For those who were unsure (and that was including me) of when CD players started to perform a "perfect" D/A job, here you go: 34 years.

So, very well done the engineers at JVC. The JVC XL-Z335 will respect your CDs and allow the music to flow without any unwanted noise or distortion.

I hope you enjoyed the review, and again let me know how to improve and if you have questions. I have recorded all the 44 measurements and if you want me to publish others or run one of your choice, feel free to ask.

--------
Flo
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much for your effort! And the obvious question is: where is the progress in 34 years of audio history since it was build? This "ancient" CD-Player performs at the theoretical limit of the CD format and is still working to specs after decades... unbelievable!!! Now I wonder, how my Philips CD 100 measures :p
 
Hi, thanks for your comments.

That’s what I wanted to know. Basically roughly only 8 years of development after the release of the first CD player were necessary to perfectly resolve CD Audio content.

That might be why the folks at Sony got bored and needed a new toy to play with, which they called SACD :)

Your CD 100 measures probably exactly as the Marantz CD-73 which I reviewed, since it is the exact same tech inside. Keep it!
 
Last edited:
During the THX Surround EX days, JVC had a great home theater amplifier which also used JVC’s proprietary DACs.

It would be really interesting to see how the K2 version of the JVC CD players performed with today’s test equipment.

 
Since your data shows, that this player is state of the art (16 bit, 44,1 kHz), I hope @amirm promotes it to the front page.....
 
Both channels are represented but only one gets evaluated in that window. Right channel is a little less performing, but both are very similar.
Hi @NTTY !
I've just measured my recently arrived XL Z331, I'm glad I find same behavior as yours! I have to admit that directly compare this one to the Marantz, turning up the volume I can clearly hear some 100/150Hz hum coming from the speakers, I was a little disappointed.
Playing some music I can't detect any obvious difference with my ears. Have to check the wiring...

Data are of L channel.

Cheers,
Luca
1732123835205.png
 
Indeed identical. That’s fun and satisfying to find same results so far away with different measurement interfaces, which proves our testing protocol works ;)

That said I see -12dBFS at the input, so I guess you used a full scale test tone from the CD but the interface had the input gain lowered, right? I see the ENOB is too high to be true ;)

Hum from mains will remain hidden when playing music, especially at normal volume, indeed. Then you might be like me, somehow sensitive to that type of low level frequency noise. I can hear the hum of my amplifier while my daughter and wife tell me I’m pretending to hear something only to get a reason for a change :facepalm:
 
That’s fun and satisfying to find same results so far away with different measurement
Yes I was exited to compare.
I guess you used a full scale test tone from the CD but the interface had the input gain lowered, right?
Yes, I have to use input 3 and 4 with fixed gain, 1 and 2 have far worst performance in the MOTU M4.

I'm a little perfectionist too, I need to know that all is working at specs, and so I have to measure.
I have tried to hide this new arrived but my little son discovered it immediately... "Dad what's this? It's new?"
 
I wonder how much is measurement variations. The Cambridge Azur came up with THD+N of -94.9 dB using the undithered "0 dB 1 kHz signal".
 
I wonder how much is measurement variations. The Cambridge Azur came up with THD+N of -94.9 dB using the undithered "0 dB 1 kHz signal".
Without dither, this player would have done the same or very close. I don’t have it anymore to test, unfortunately.
 
The only slight negative is the treble roll-off I guess.
Good point, and I think it’s an operator error :facepalm:
By the looks of it, it seems I forgot to apply the interface roll-off compensation. I’ll double check that from the file and update if necessary.
 
My plots are from undithered signals.
I guessed that. And numbers are quite close to the Cambridge although visually there is more mains noise from the JVC.

SNR: 95.5 dB vs. 95.6
THD: -99.3 vs. -103.5
THD+N: -94.0 vs. -94.9

My point was that numbers are very close and small variations could be related to the measurement setup.
 
My plots are from undithered signals.
Yeah, nearly 3dB better in the Dashboard of Luca for the SNR calculation, and that's what it is compared to dither from REW (which I used at the time).
 
I guessed that. And numbers are quite close to the Cambridge although visually there is more mains noise from the JVC.

SNR: 95.5 dB vs. 95.6
THD: -99.3 vs. -103.5
THD+N: -94.0 vs. -94.9

My point was that numbers are very close and small variations could be related to the measurement setup.
Even with the same interface, same player, same operator, you could see these variations, especially on noise perspective, just depending on the moment of the day when the measurements are performed or potential other devices plugged to the same wall socket. When averaging 32 times, the distorsion should be stable, less so without averaging. Some players show small variances when cold/warm in that range too.
 
My two cents on jitter test of my unit.
Still not completely understand how to interpret this, apart from the AM modulation of the "carrier" I can zoom in. I see no significant random noise, can't well interpret that descendant spectrum, something like a square wave, and why the DUT slightly increase the level of some particular frequency.

1732699776509.png



1732704242246.png
 
And just for comparison an overlay with the overall better performance of the Marantz jitter side. It's anyway incredible what they achieved in a consumer product with just a one layer PCB.


1732706427393.png

Zoomed 10k/12k
1732719070010.png
 
Last edited:
Hum from mains will remain hidden when playing music,
Yesterday I've dismantled my unit to verify why moving the connectors I see strange spectral lines, it was the common ground of the output connector with a dry solder joint.
In practice the ground closing was through the metal chassis :facepalm:.
After fix it it's dead silent like my new one and like measurements says it has to be.
 
Back
Top Bottom