- Thread Starter
- #21
The color of the power button cycles between red, green and blue.Is there a visual indication or do you keep tapping the button until you hear what your source is playing?
The color of the power button cycles between red, green and blue.Is there a visual indication or do you keep tapping the button until you hear what your source is playing?
Not bad. Still not happy about the filter response, but a great implementation of the tried and tested AKM chip nonetheless.
Technically correct filter would truncate at half the sampling rate which would be 22.05 kHz. The default filters instead roll off at 24 kHz.Why, please? Where would be the downsize of that graph?
Technically correct filter would truncate at half the sampling rate which would be 22.05 kHz. The default filters instead roll off at 24 kHz.
And my gosh does the El Dac look the same, sexy as hell.
The latest AKM dac is the AK4499 Topping D90, Gustard A22 and others will use it in the future.I wonder why JDS didn't use the AKM4497 as this is the latest AKM dac currently in used in the higher end Topping and SMSL DACs.
Yes, I am aware of the AK4499 but like you said, it'll be used in the future so currently the AK4497 is latest AKM that dac manufacturer have been using . Yeah, with higher model the price will be more and perhaps that additional sound improvement (if any) may not justify the hike in price, right?The latest AKM dac is the AK4499 Topping D90, Gustard A22 and others will use it in the future.
AK4490/AK4493 is the typical choice in ~$200 range. AK4497 is ~$400 range and up.
...not like chip matters so much. RME ADI-2 v2 with AK4493 beats 99% of AK4497 implementations out there
I don't think so, no. One should just look at what's best performing within his budget, and not at what chip is used. (imo)Yeah, with higher model the price will be more and perhaps that additional sound improvement (if any) may not justify the hike in price, right?
I meant looking from JDS perspective maybe using 4493 vs 4497 is good enough performance for the consumers while maintaining lower cost.I don't think so, no. One should just look at what's best performing within his budget, and not at what chip is used. (imo)
It's probably *before* and *after* this reviewI’m seeing $299.
Spec for 1kHz (@150ohm) is 0.0008%
0.001% is for 20Hz-20kHz.
Yes, definitely. AK4497 also needs a lot of parts to support the chip, not sure it would fit in the EL DAC/Element chassis at all..I meant looking from JDS perspective maybe using 4493 vs 4497 is good enough performance for the consumers while maintaining lower cost.
A tiny black box with a single coloured ring is "sexy as hell"?
Here is sexy as hell (our local gal, Margot Robbie):
View attachment 39345
Yes, definitely. AK4497 also needs a lot of parts to support the chip, not sure it would fit in the EL DAC/Element chassis at all..
I disagree. Most AK4497 are pretty solid blocks full of components. Even the cheapest SMSL M300 is noticeably heftier than JDS labs products.AK4497 is no more difficult to implement than AK4493. It's the AK4499 that requires more parts.
The AK4497 is much more costly than the AK4493 though (more than 5 times the cost at DigiKey, probably cheaper in bulk though) and doesn't really offer a performance boost consistent with the price delta.
Isn't that one of those new-fangled models that can't maintain full output for 5 minutes?Here is sexy as hell (our local gal, Margot Robbie)...