• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

JDS Labs EL DAC II Review

OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,376
Likes
234,556
Location
Seattle Area
Is there a visual indication or do you keep tapping the button until you hear what your source is playing?
The color of the power button cycles between red, green and blue.
 

wadec22

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2018
Messages
319
Likes
242
this seems fine for a revision, like a 1.2, but for a "II" I really wish we would have seen some new features; XLR, digital volume wheel, display, remote..... something....

I'm a HUGE supporter of theirs but a little disappointed.
 

trl

Major Contributor
King of Mods
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Messages
1,967
Likes
2,523
Location
Iasi, RO
Not bad. Still not happy about the filter response, but a great implementation of the tried and tested AKM chip nonetheless.

Why, please? Where would be the downsize of that graph?
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,376
Likes
234,556
Location
Seattle Area
Why, please? Where would be the downsize of that graph?
Technically correct filter would truncate at half the sampling rate which would be 22.05 kHz. The default filters instead roll off at 24 kHz.
 

raif71

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
2,333
Likes
2,535
I wonder why JDS didn't use the AKM4497 as this is the latest AKM dac currently in used in the higher end Topping and SMSL DACs.
 

trl

Major Contributor
King of Mods
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Messages
1,967
Likes
2,523
Location
Iasi, RO
Technically correct filter would truncate at half the sampling rate which would be 22.05 kHz. The default filters instead roll off at 24 kHz.

I see, thank you.

What about the possibility to include in future measurements the pre/post ringing of an impulse response? AKM speaks out loud that each filter has its own audio "flavor", so maybe seeing how DAC filters look like might be helpful.
 

restorer-john

Grand Contributor
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
12,588
Likes
38,291
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
And my gosh does the El Dac look the same, sexy as hell.

A tiny black box with a single coloured ring is "sexy as hell"?

Here is sexy as hell (our local gal, Margot Robbie):

1574148509639.png
 

Veri

Master Contributor
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
9,596
Likes
12,036
I wonder why JDS didn't use the AKM4497 as this is the latest AKM dac currently in used in the higher end Topping and SMSL DACs.
The latest AKM dac is the AK4499 :D Topping D90, Gustard A22 and others will use it in the future.
AK4490/AK4493 is the typical choice in ~$200 range. AK4497 is ~$400 range and up.

...not like chip matters so much. RME ADI-2 v2 with AK4493 beats 99% of AK4497 implementations out there :)
 

raif71

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
2,333
Likes
2,535
The latest AKM dac is the AK4499 :D Topping D90, Gustard A22 and others will use it in the future.
AK4490/AK4493 is the typical choice in ~$200 range. AK4497 is ~$400 range and up.

...not like chip matters so much. RME ADI-2 v2 with AK4493 beats 99% of AK4497 implementations out there :)
Yes, I am aware of the AK4499 but like you said, it'll be used in the future so currently the AK4497 is latest AKM that dac manufacturer have been using :). Yeah, with higher model the price will be more and perhaps that additional sound improvement (if any) may not justify the hike in price, right?
 

Veri

Master Contributor
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
9,596
Likes
12,036
Yeah, with higher model the price will be more and perhaps that additional sound improvement (if any) may not justify the hike in price, right?
I don't think so, no. One should just look at what's best performing within his budget, and not at what chip is used. (imo)
 

raif71

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
2,333
Likes
2,535
I don't think so, no. One should just look at what's best performing within his budget, and not at what chip is used. (imo)
I meant looking from JDS perspective maybe using 4493 vs 4497 is good enough performance for the consumers while maintaining lower cost.
 

Veri

Master Contributor
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
9,596
Likes
12,036
I meant looking from JDS perspective maybe using 4493 vs 4497 is good enough performance for the consumers while maintaining lower cost.
Yes, definitely. AK4497 also needs a lot of parts to support the chip, not sure it would fit in the EL DAC/Element chassis at all..
 

JJB70

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 17, 2018
Messages
2,905
Likes
6,148
Location
Singapore
I am really interested in the matching amplifier much more than this DAC but the measurements look very satisfactory (if not SOTA), it is nicely made and with good industrial design. Given that you are getting a product from a manufacturer with a first class reputation for customer service and standing their product the price seems reasonable to me. Especially when you look at the ridiculous prices being charged for worse products out there which still seem to find buyers. I am not really into DACs as separate components but if I was to buy one then getting this together with the amplifier would be quite attractive.
 

ElNino

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Messages
557
Likes
722
Yes, definitely. AK4497 also needs a lot of parts to support the chip, not sure it would fit in the EL DAC/Element chassis at all..

AK4497 is no more difficult to implement than AK4493. It's the AK4499 that requires more parts.

The AK4497 is much more costly than the AK4493 though (more than 5 times the cost at DigiKey, probably cheaper in bulk though) and doesn't really offer a performance boost consistent with the price delta.
 

Veri

Master Contributor
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
9,596
Likes
12,036
AK4497 is no more difficult to implement than AK4493. It's the AK4499 that requires more parts.

The AK4497 is much more costly than the AK4493 though (more than 5 times the cost at DigiKey, probably cheaper in bulk though) and doesn't really offer a performance boost consistent with the price delta.
I disagree. Most AK4497 are pretty solid blocks full of components. Even the cheapest SMSL M300 is noticeably heftier than JDS labs products.

Screenshot at Nov 19 16-09-23.png


Same for the cheap Loxjie D20 ak4497 dac. Both it and the M300 are weightier and larger in height. It's too simple to assume you can make a small, compact ak4497 dac and think it will work properly, also with respect to heat etc. I haven't seen any such small device yet...

With good reason I would think. EL DAC II with AK4497 would simply not work without some major changes. It would not fit the product's purpose, design or elegance.
 
Joined
Nov 19, 2019
Messages
83
Likes
34
So I also saw $299 not $249. I still feel like I stole it at $299 from what I am reading. Still inquiring minds. I am just wondering if I should get the EL amp II and retire the atom who is in it’s breaking in period still. Damn I love this hobby but I cannot stop the wheels of progress.
 
Top Bottom