• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

JBL goes Dirac Live ready and Class-D

Attractive and sensible design. I like how they handled EQ, especially ability to easily implement real measurement mikes.
Any info on built-in EQ curves for JBL/ Harman speakers?
 
Hi Folks,

Came across this out of the UK... no sign of it elsewhere yet...


AVR's ranging from 5.2 to 9.2, with Class D amps of up to 140W@8ohm, and Dirac in the top models.

Looks like JBL is ready to make a push into the mainstream AVR market again...
(for the "faithful" old timers, no sign of Logic7/Logic16)
Again? They made some sort of recognizable push before? Harman's old Logic stuff may not have crossed the corporate division lines? :)
 
Again? They made some sort of recognizable push before? Harman's old Logic stuff may not have crossed the corporate division lines? :)
You are right, I wrote JBL, but was thinking "Harman".... which is now all Samsung anyway!
 
Wow! Looks like I finally found a replacement for my aging Pioneer Elite SC-LX801. The MA-7100HP is a great price and supports DIRAC.

Martin
 
Wow! Looks like I finally found a replacement for my aging Pioneer Elite SC-LX801. The MA-7100HP is a great price and supports DIRAC.
Agreed, it looks great. There's also good news in that someone may be sending Amir one for testing in the not-too-distant future... ;)
 
I am assuming they are using their own class-D amplifiers?
I don't think there's any information on that, at least that I've been able to find. The only shot I can find of the internals doesn't seem to shed much light on the matter either:

g109MA7100B-o_other9.jpg


I'm assuming that board at the bottom in the power supply, and the only other board clearly visible is the HDMI board at the top. What I assume are aluminum heatsinks are likely attached to the amplifiers?

I would expect that JBL is using their own design, or perhaps pulled from a sister brand like Crown?
 
This was posted a few days ago on AVS.

I've already had a couple minutes with the 9100hp and it works really, really well. Pushing the amp with a new line of JBL loudspeakers in a large room to high spl didn't seem to bother the amp at all. Looking inside, the amps seems to be TPA 3255 based (I could be wrong though..). I can't tell whether PFFB is inplemented. Soon I'll have more tine with the amp, enabling me to form a better opinion, but so far I'm impressed. It clearly differs from the Denon/Marantz/Onkyo etc offerings in a couple of ways. Some will like this, others might not. I certainly appreciate the different approach.

Passive circuit component Circuit component Green Light Electronic instrument
 
Based on a review/measurements of this amplifier that uses the TPA 3255, that might work out quite well if it is in fact the case.
 
This was posted a few days ago on AVS.

I've already had a couple minutes with the 9100hp and it works really, really well. Pushing the amp with a new line of JBL loudspeakers in a large room to high spl didn't seem to bother the amp at all. Looking inside, the amps seems to be TPA 3255 based (I could be wrong though..). I can't tell whether PFFB is inplemented. Soon I'll have more tine with the amp, enabling me to form a better opinion, but so far I'm impressed. It clearly differs from the Denon/Marantz/Onkyo etc offerings in a couple of ways. Some will like this, others might not. I certainly appreciate the different approach.

Passive circuit component Circuit component Green Light Electronic instrument
It does look a bit like the Drivecore ClassD chipset used in previous JBL poweramps, Crown amps, and some past Lexicon amps...

but it would be nice to have more info!
 
so far I'm impressed <-- source AVS
Which was to be expected and certainly not even Dirac Live was active here. A listening comparison with an A1H would be interesting. Unfortunately there is no multi-channel reactive load test yet.
 
TPA 3255, that might work out quite well if it is in fact the case.
Pin count and the implementation probably indicate that: Link

Screenshot_20240725-072234_Chrome.jpg
 
Last edited:
Um? What you linked to is just packaging?
 
Back
Top Bottom