Ragnarsson
Member
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2021
- Messages
- 15
- Likes
- 20
I need to edit my previous post, but the Edit command disappeared. Does anyone knows why and how to fix this?
Thanks for this. Just to mention that the Swedish Audio-Technical Society recommended 195 pF/42 kOhm for the Super OM40 to get a linear response. Interested in the OM30 with 150 pF and 40k.Ortofon Super OM 40
This was acquired new from thakker.eu around a year ago. For an exact date, ask @Thomas_A
As the recommend load range is 200-400pF, I started right in the middle at 305pF:
View attachment 427942
Not horrible, but not great. Wish the response deviations at the extremes were less, and the behavior above 15kHz looks like a monster resonance right around 20kHz. Perhaps later I'll add some plots up to 50kHz to see what's going on there.
These are filtered plots (for readability) of various loads, using the right channel as it was the hottest:
View attachment 427943
View attachment 427944
And at 30K/305pF, as that's what looked the most reasonable:
View attachment 427945
I had a rise as welll in the top end at 140 pF/47k. Lowereing R to 35-40 would probably do it. The OM10 is even more hot. Perhaps some slight individual differences exists.From the data I have, can’t see that 195pF and 42k would get us anywhere near that goal. Maybe very low Cl like 50pF would get us nearly flat to around 15kHz.
I noticed your 2023 measurements were very different to my example. Do we know why?
Many thank, now I do not need to buy that one! .. How well does it track the Ortofon test record?
I think Ingvar Oehman used the JVC TRS-1007. At the time, paper printers were used. 147 pF and 50 kOhm showed a rising top end, reducing it to 42.8 kOhm gave a more linear response. This was done many years ago though.Looks like the shape of the curve is markedly different - more so than is typically seen from unit variation. Do we know what test record SATS used?
Not sure about that when I look at your results. Can you test 100-150 pF/43k? (Noted that I remembered wrong. Not 195 pF but 147 pF as in the article).Hmm. Looking like a generator change, perhaps. If anyone has a body that is from that time frame, that could be interesting.
Updated both load plots. 47k/55pF isn't too far from 43k/155pF. If we consider the HF behavior of the left channel, either one of those could be reasonably flat. So nod to @Thomas_A that it's likely unit variation. Color me unimpressed.
EDIT - plotted both channels since they vary so much.
The high-Q resonance just below 20 kHz gives a dip and peak in L/R respectively. My OM40 just gave a dip. Phase of crosstalk signal is the most likely reason; in my case both out-of phase, in yours one in phase and the other out of phase.Updated both load plots. 47k/55pF isn't too far from 43k/155pF. If we consider the HF behavior of the left channel, either one of those could be reasonably flat. So nod to @Thomas_A that it's likely unit variation. Color me unimpressed.
EDIT - plotted both channels since they vary so much.
Try the OM10-20-30 stylii. The divergent HF response L/R may indicate a stylus/suspension issue.No idea. Anyway, seems that around 47k/55pF, 43k/155pF, or 30k/305pF could all be reasonable loads depending on the variability of a given example.