It seems that there are far better values out there, at or below the S400 price point.
That's probably because you never auditioned them.It seems that there are far better values out there, at or below the S400 price point.
I would if I could. I don't want to buy a pair, then send them back just to form an opinion. That might increase the cost others might have to pay for them, if we all did it.That's probably because you never auditioned them.
The 500 Hz thing wasn't audible to Amir or Erin. The bracing is nice, but is probably the smallest of all the changes they made.Here's hoping that Mads sends across the S400 Mk II across to Amir. Given the added bracing and other tweaks and a slight increase to price, I'll be keen to see if he they've addressed the 500 hz issue
I asked Mads and they are supposedly working on it. If you ask me, they probably have them already.Is it just me or did Bucardt not post any measurements of the mark 2?
Not a fair comparison. The Buchardt will wipe the floor with the LS50 mostly due to bass. You'd have to compare against LS50 + 10" sealed sub.S400 mkii vs ls50 meta , without audition what would you pick and why?
Is there anything he does not?Nemo loves these
Nemo loves these
I agree with this opinion belowS400 mkii vs ls50 meta , without audition what would you pick and why?
but to be fair with the price difference you can comfortably buy a decent subwoofer for the LS50 Meta.Not a fair comparison. The Buchardt will wipe the floor with the LS50 mostly due to bass. You'd have to compare against LS50 + 10" sealed sub.
The LS50 had lots of sibilance in my roomI agree with this opinion below
but to be fair with the price difference you can comfortably buy a decent subwoofer for the LS50 Meta.
We're talking about two different speakers, the LS50 is about a decade old.The LS50 had lots of sibilance in my room
Not a fair comparison. The Buchardt will wipe the floor with the LS50 mostly due to bass. You'd have to compare against LS50 + 10" sealed sub.
Preference scores are not a good indicator of sound quality when speakers are in the same range.That is not immediately obvious from the preference scores (5.5 vs 5.6-6.0 in favour of LS50M)
Maybe. I'd watch the comparison above.LS50M+sub will be significantly better at a lower price.
well... i liked that he liked it and now i like itIs there anything he does not?