- Thread Starter
- #741
There is a lot disrespect and presumptions in your post. I suggest reading for a while before jumping in with assertions about who believes what. And what we know or don't know. You can start by reading this article I published years ago: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...s/target-room-response-and-cinema-x-curve.10/You are correct and what decades of research found is that most people do not prefer a truly flat responce, mostly because we dont have a calibration tool for the human ear which is not linear in terms of how it interprets frequencies. I like this forum you guys do a great job, but why not take in to account some other factors such as people like myself who has had years of experience. In terms of the measurements you took even mads stated it was odd looking. I dont have the equipment you have but I have through rew and dirac changes from when I first set them up to now. There are very few endgame speakers and the ones that are probably could not be afforded by 89 percent of the people on this forum. I agree Buchardts aren't endgame but they are a great speaker for the price for people that enjoy listening to music they love for long periods of time. I have parapalegia so ihave plenty of time. I love the Kef R3 as well and I can budget about 5k a year to my hobby. The kef eventually gets tiring in the treble responce and after years of analyzing sound i just want to enjoy it. The Buchardts allow that and for all practical purposes are full range. I will say I still miss my Vienna Acoustics Beethoven's. That's my 89cents and again no disrespect meant in any way.
Remember, you are not the first or the last person who is bothered by a review not matching their notions of fidelity. We post objective, verifiable data that you can read and analyze. That data demonstrated that there were production changes that were not disclosed that caused my measurements to be different than the company's. So all the consternations about variations for measurements were for not if you paid attention to what was written.
As to your experience, unless you tell us your name and formal research background in this topic, it doesn't mean anything. Every audiophile says they have years of experience. Listening to music and playing with gear is not "experience" that contradicts objective data. We would not exist if audiophile experiences were trustworthy. They simply are not because they don't study the research and perform proper evaluation of gear.
The S400 measures well so it is a good speaker anyway. So not sure why you would be bent out of shape over the review and assessment.
Finally, as I keep saying, Mads runs the company. He is not the designer or engineer behind this speaker. He is relaying what those designers are saying but we have no ability to directly question them. And again, the conflict is resolved anyway as our measurements showed design changes and were therefore correct in overall assesment.
If you are impatient and skipping over all of back and forth, it is understood. But please don't make up conclusions and slap us in the face with them as you did. Take it easy, let it all sink in. There is incredible amount of knowledge and consensus in this forum. Running foul of them will cause you a bloody nose to be sure.