Organic material doesn't equal life, though, does it?
It sure doesn't.
It could be argued that the term is a misnomer, since many (not all!) molecules containing carbon were noticed to be of biological origin (proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, and nucleic acids). Organic compounds, are those containing carbon and hydrogen (at minimum), and often oxygen, nitrogen (and many others). Fundamentally, the term means
carbonaceous, but excludes non-organic carbon (e.g., carbonates).
The synthesis of urea by Wohler (in 1828, according to teh interwebs -- I wasn't around!) from an inorganic precursor (ammonium cyanate) was effectively the genesis (no pun intended) of the science of organic chemistry. Wohler is reported to have written "I must tell you that I can make urea without the use of kidneys, either man or dog. Ammonium cyanate is urea.[
sic]"
EDIT: Indeed, urea isn't commercially produced today from
lots and lots of enslaved kidneys, but rather from ammonia and carbon dioxide.
We don’t know how life started on Earth but scientists are working on it.
"They" have been since at least the mid 1950s.
There is abundant evidence of extraterrestrial-origin nucleobases arriving on earth.
"Nucleobases"? What do you mean by this? Do you mean nucleotides, or just the bases themselves (adenine, uridine, guanidine, citidine, uracil) or something else? The bases are relatively simple "enabler" molecules.
Since I am not an exobiologist (rather, I'm a biochemist - albeit a somewhat lazy one) and you seem to know, please do share some reference from the peer reviewed literature. Thanks!
The existence of the bases themselves, similar to the known existence of other extraterrestrial organic compounds (e.g., some amino acids) doesn't really say much about the existence of extraterrestrial life. It does say something about the universality of organic chemistry, which is kind of reassuring -- at least to organic chemists!