• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Why Luxury Goods & Audio are strange bedfellow's

BTW, is it all still working?, it looks awesome:)
Most of it -- I've never had the nerve to try the CA-2010, which was an "as is" purchase. While reputed to work, its aura troubled me enough ;) to demur. The price was very attractive, so I still have no qualms about having made the "investment". ;)
Everything else there works -- the three Sherwood vacuum tube components included. They are all three superb; particularly the tuners. I used the Sherwood in the basement for years our previous house, but there's really no - ahem - use case :rolleyes: for it here, so it's a shelf queen monarch in the current state of affairs.
 
I like beautiful things but I have no interest in luxury things, these things can coincide but they are not necessarily synonymous.
I love the Shelby cobra 427, I think it is a work of art, but I could never afford it, but I find almost all Bentleys hideous and I would have no pleasure in owning one.
The same goes for hifi, the idea of buying something just because it is luxury I find abhorrent, for example I really like the Mission Lx2, they are speakers costing a few hundred euros that I find elegant and beautiful, then there are speakers like the B&W Nautilus that I would not put in my living room even if I were paid to do so.
I appreciate things that I consider beautiful, or things that are beautiful but for functional reasons, I do not like things for which "being beautiful" is the only function, they are so stupid.... (personal opinion)
 
I like beautiful things but I have no interest in luxury things, these things can coincide but they are not necessarily synonymous.
I love the Shelby cobra 427, I think it is a work of art, but I could never afford it, but I find almost all Bentleys hideous and I would have no pleasure in owning one.
The same goes for hifi, the idea of buying something just because it is luxury I find abhorrent, for example I really like the Mission Lx2, they are speakers costing a few hundred euros that I find elegant and beautiful, then there are speakers like the B&W Nautilus that I would not put in my living room even if I were paid to do so.
I appreciate things that I consider beautiful, or things that are beautiful but for functional reasons, I do not like things for which "being beautiful" is the only function, they are so stupid.... (personal opinion)
, I do not like things for which "being beautiful" is the only function, they are so stupid.... (personal opinion)

Hmm, a beautiful painting might be one of the exceptions here, but i see your point:)
 
What about music itself?
That is a function that is not related to "being Beautiful" (at l least as I take it to mean. The choice of music may or may not be beautiful.
On the other side of the coin, the machining of the parts of my Doug Nash 5 speed (5th is NOT an overdrive) racing transmission surprised me by being 'beautiful to the eye & the touch' (to me, it's literally the equivalent of fine jewelry, anyone seeing it is amazed that it is the inside mechanisms of an automobile racing transmission).
So it's beautiful but that is not part of it's function. But the feel of it's function is also 'beautiful". Slick & smooth shifts (and it is strong beauty, as while only being rated for 450 pound feet of torque, it can operate with finesse against 800 pound feet of torque (I know because I have done it).
Being a Beautiful object can be the sole reason for somethings being. Which I don't particularly care for, although, choosing for decoration is it's own niche.
Or something can be beautiful and have a function. Which it may or may not do beautifully.
Or it cam function beautifully & not be beautiful.
I will take function over form every time. But, if the function is as good & it happens to be beautiful (and the price difference is not outrageous), I'll take the more beautiful one.
 
Chevy SS extended cab truck. I would love to own a 2 door
Heh)). I drive an Explorer II. The 2-meter long trunk is convenient for my work. Last night I was racing with a stupidly slow motorcyclist; he wouldn't let me into the left lane when he wanted to go right. Although it was easy for him to overtake me.
If it weren't for work, I'd prefer a three-door Bronco or Tahoe.
When Greg Timbers was fired from the JBL, the guys at the Lansing Forum wanted to drive their trucks to the JBL office to protest. I really liked the idea, but how do you cross the ocean in an old Explorer? :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
Heh)). I drive an Explorer II. The 2-meter long trunk is convenient for my work. Last night I was racing with a stupidly slow motorcyclist; he wouldn't let me into the left lane when he wanted to go right. Although it was easy for him to overtake me.
If it weren't for work, I'd prefer a three-door Bronco or Tahoe.
When Greg Timbers was fired from the JBL, the guys at the Lansing Forum wanted to drive their trucks to the JBL office to protest. I really liked the idea, but how do you cross the ocean in an old Explorer? :D
2004 with 210,000 miles on it. 345 HP, 380 Lb./Ft. torque, 150+ Db. train horn (to let people know when they did me wrong if their [stupid] maneuvering caused me to have to counter maneuver to avoid an accident). It can cut through their paying attention to their phone, their car stereo or their motorcycle exhaust noise (usually just a momentary tap of it's button does the trick).
IMG_6131.JPG
 
Unless I missed it, the author seems to neglect the “ pride of ownership” factor they can attract people to high end audio that has an element of luxury. This is not in the showoff since but simply how it satisfies someone’s personal aesthetic goals.

It seems to me for a long time there was a perception that audiophiles are strictly about the sound - they are basement dwelling man caved dwelling denizens who don’t care how anything looks, but only how it performs.l

But I’ve been pleasantly surprised over the years in the many “ show your system” threads on different forms, how nice looking many of the systems are, and how many audiophiles seem to care about the craftsmanship finish and looks of their equipment as well.
Yes, oddly, the author is the owner of TONE Audio Magazine and editor. Strange that he missed that.
 
I do to but not everyone here is taught English in he same way, nor does everyone form different places now what abbreviations are used with what. Especially when many of them can be used for many different things in this world.
If you are not a business person and English is not your first language, you may be clueless as to what is being said.
When dealing on the world stage (as we are here) it's better to be clear and not use abbreviations.
Especially if the abbreviations do not pertain to audio. (Those are hard enough for me to learn (the ones that are newer than the year 2000) since I lived on Islands in the Indian Ocean & Western Pacific Ocean for 17 years and had not one conversation involving audio during that time.
If an unfamiliar abbreviation is used, the first instance of it should be spelled out and explained, if necessary. Then use it as needed.
 
Which is why you are making my point. I don't drive a Prius, but if my only consideratiins were rational, I probably would.
My considerations, like yours: are rational to ourselves.
Some people hate to drive at all (I know 2 of them). One gets her husband to drive everywhere (her mother's house, the grocery store, if she wans a McDonalds soda (she sends him10 miles each way to get her a single soda for herself). She drove to work for 30 years, and he worked another few years. After he retired (about 5 years ago) she has not driven since (and he is severely handy capped with both knees and lower back issues and numerous surgeries (to be fair she has had both knees done but she walks MUCH better than him). But these things are rational to her.
Another is a female cousin of mine, grew up rural, now lives in an expanded town, never learned to drive and won't leave the house, not even for her mother or fathers funeral.
Or to go with her husband to the hospital because he is dying of mouth and throat cancer
But these things are rational to these 2 people.
But likely not to many other people.
I just like to drive. Truck, car, performance car, boat, tractor, ship, airplane, traffic, no traffic (better), motorcycle, dirt bike, Go Kart, backhoes, road graders, on road, off road (I got a ticket once for leaving the roadway {when I told the state trooper that was my intent, he had a strange look about himself}), whatever can be driven and wherever it can be driven. To me, that is rational. A Prius would not likely make my normal, daily drives even once. Actually, it would not make it to my home from the main road.
So, a Prius, that could not possibly get me home, is irrational for me.
Driveway (a friends truck, mine is not as capable as his, my wife has a 2024 Subaru CrossTrek Touring Edition that I lifted 2" and it's just fine. But a Prius, no way):
IMG_4936.JPG
IMG_4938.JPG
 
Last edited:
If an unfamiliar abbreviation is used, the first instance of it should be spelled out and explained, if necessary. Then use it as needed.
I agree, if it is explained in the first post in any thread that mentions it. But new people are coming on all the time and there are many variations of English. If one can go back to it's first use in a thread and get the meaning, that would be great. But that is not likely to happen at each thread.
Here is just a few of the about 170 regional variations of the English language:
British English
British English is the regional dialect spoken throughout the United Kingdom. It is characterized by a non-rhotic pronunciation, where the "r" at the end of words is generally not pronounced unless followed by a vowel, leading to more pronounced vowel sounds. This dialect is highly diverse, with numerous regional accents such as Cockney from East London, Geordie from Newcastle, and the Received Pronunciation (RP), often considered the standard accent in formal settings.
The vocabulary of British English includes unique terms and usage, distinguishing it domestically and internationally. For instance, British English uses "lorry" for what is known as a "truck" in American English, and "flat" instead of "apartment."
American English
American English has developed distinct characteristics that set it apart from its parent language, British English, primarily due to the diverse cultural influences of European settlers in America. Over time, these influences have shaped American English in several key ways. Furthermore, Americans tend to use contractions such as "can't," "won't," and "don't" more frequently than their British counterparts. American English commonly uses the simple past tense in contexts where other dialects might use the present perfect. For example, Americans are likely to say "I already saw that movie" instead of "I have already seen that movie." This usage reflects a more informal style that permeates American everyday speech.
Pronunciation also varies significantly between American and British English, with some words having completely different pronunciations. A classic example is the word "tomato," pronounced "tuh-MAH-toh" in British English and "tuh-MAY-toh" in American English.
Australian English
Australian English shares many similarities with British English due to Australia's colonial history but has developed its own idiosyncratic characteristics over time, influenced by the diverse accents of the early settlers from the United Kingdom and Ireland, as well as the languages of Indigenous Australians. It has noticeable vowel shifts that add a nasal sound to words like "mate" and "date." The dialect includes informal slang such as "arvo" for afternoon, "bikkie" for biscuit, and "bottle-o" for the liquor store.
Indian English
Indian English is an interesting variation because it combines aspects of both British English and Asian languages like Urdu or Hindi.It retains much of its original grammar structure but adds various elements that make it distinctively Indian - for example, Indian English often place adjectives before nouns instead of after them as most other dialects do; this is similar to how adjectives are structured in Hindi or Urdu sentences. In terms of consonant sounds, the "w" is frequently pronounced similarly to "v," making "wet" sound like "vet."
Canadian English
Canadian English draws heavily from both BrE and AmE but also incorporates elements taken from French due to Canada's history with French colonization before becoming a British colony itself. This dialect follows grammatical structures similar to those used in American English but incorporates direct French phrases into everyday language, such as "bonjour" and "bonsoir" for "hello" and "good evening," respectively. Additionally, Canadian English has developed its own set of slang terms. For example, a "double-double" refers to a coffee with two creams and two sugars, a "parkade" is a type of multi-level parking garage.
Scottish English
Scottish people speak their unique variation of the language that has been heavily influenced by Scots Gaelic due to Scotland's long history as part of Great Britain but with its own distinct culture and identity within these islands too! One noticeable difference between Scottish and other varieties comes down to pronunciation - many Scottish natives tend to roll their Rs more frequently than others do when speaking aloud! Additionally, there are several distinct vocabulary choices used in Scotland that aren't found elsewhere - for instance, calling someone a "weegie" means they're from Glasgow!
Nigerian English
Nigerian English is spoken primarily in Nigeria and is heavily influenced by African languages like Hausa and Igbo. This variety of English typically combines British and American spelling conventions, though British spellings are more commonly used. A distinctive grammatical feature that stems from African languages is the pluralization of all nouns. For example, in Nigerian English, it's common to hear, "She gave me many useful advices," where "advice" is used in the plural form, a practice unusual in other English dialects. Nigerian English also incorporates a lot of slang terms, such as “chop” which means to eat food, or “mehn” which is an expression used to emphasize something.
Philippine English
Philippine English is a variant of the language that has been heavily influenced by Tagalog, the most widely-spoken language in the Philippines. As such, Philippine English tends to be much more relaxed than other variants of the language; for example, it often uses contractions like “ain't” instead of using proper grammar rules like saying "isn't". The use of Tagalog words in Philippine English is also common; words like “karaoke” (from karangalan) or “jeepney” (from jeep) are examples of these kinds of words.
Singaporean English
Singaporean English has been shaped by both British colonial influences and Chinese influences. It features less formal grammar, frequently using contractions like "gonna" instead of "going to."Brief words like "lah," "ah," and others are often appended to sentences to add extra layers of meaning or express emotions like surprise or confusion. For example, if someone is impressed by a meal, they might comment, "This food is delicious siah!" where "siah" is used to really highlight their approval.
 
Back to the topic of luxury, I'd be intrigued by how comfy a Hästens bed might be! Considering that a person spends about 1/3rd of the day sleeping, this is potentially a great place to indulge.

Kitchen tools, tableware: I prepare a lot of my own meals, and I'm not too price-sensitive about something I might use every day. But having said that, the set of three small no-name strainers I bought from an AliExpress vendor are great. Have seen the exact item being sold for much more at a fancy local kitchen store. On other occasions, I've found exactly what I wanted in a shop like Muji, Ikea, or Daiso. Not everything benefits from a "next level"!
 
Back to the topic of luxury, I'd be intrigued by how comfy a Hästens bed might be! Considering that a person spends about 1/3rd of the day sleeping, this is potentially a great place to indulge.

Kitchen tools, tableware: I prepare a lot of my own meals, and I'm not too price-sensitive about something I might use every day. But having said that, the set of three small no-name strainers I bought from an AliExpress vendor are great. Have seen the exact item being sold for much more at a fancy local kitchen store. On other occasions, I've found exactly what I wanted in a shop like Muji, Ikea, or Daiso. Not everything benefits from a "next level"!
I love this comparison to kitchen tools instead of the usual car/watch thing. It works for me because a really great knife might be very expensive… or there are likely very inexpensive knives that work great. But if you spend enough time in the kitchen, you may really appreciate something special. Is it better? Maybe, but you love it and spend time with it. The same is true of many kitchen items like pans, mixers, etc. But strainers are like speaker cable. Your Ali purchase is fine. It does the job perfectly regardless of cost. Its job is so utilitarian that unless you just want to improve upon it aesthetic, or perhaps durability, there is nothing to be gained. Even by a master chef.
 
Back
Top Bottom