I suppose then, unless it's a Technics, generally speaking, a belt drive is preferred; is that correct?
I don’t think that’s accurate. I think there was a lot of anti-Japanese sentiment when it came to audio by the audiophile press. There is a claim that the servo was more audible than incorrect speed that was steady.
Unlike DACs, I think it is generally safe to say that you get what you pay for in build quality between $500, $1000, $1500, $2000. Above $2000 and it’s a wild card if you are getting added performance or not.
In the present day, Technics has great direct drive models since they start above $1000. However Music Hall’s Stealth is well made, Cambridge Audio’s Alva is well made, Denon’s DP-3000NE is well made. It’s the budget $300-500 direct drive turntables that might not compete as favorably to the belt drive equivalents. When BOM is constrained, presumably the belt drive works better as an overall mix.
Once you have sky is limit pricing, you can engineer around the challenges of each.
I'm still spending about €900-€1,000, one way or another, but I've trashed the "balanced" voodoo I initially succumbed to. It's likely a TT and upgraded cartridge of some sort.
Balanced turntables is less voodoo than expensive speaker cables but like everything, “it depends”.
I wouldn’t change out an unbalanced system to balanced if I wasn’t having problems, but I believe
@JP is a big proponent of balanced turntables and has measured superior performance.
(there are those who suggest that reduction of common mode noise is “X” but the need to run twice the circuitry in the phono stage increases noise there.)