This is a review and detailed measurements of the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface (DAC/ADC). I was talked into buying it recently. The 2i2 costs US $140 including free Prime shipping so very reasonable for amount of functionality.
For a budge device, the Scarlett 2i2 looks pretty good:
Yes, I have left the plastic cover on the front and back.
Leaving it there in case I decide to sell the unit.
I found the controls more logical than Behringer budget products. Like the separate volume control (small one) for headphone and the larger one for the line out for example.
The inputs are kind of strange in that depending on what type of cable you use, the gain changes. If you use XLR, it assumes microphone input and hence higher gain. If you use TRS/1/4 inch plug, then it assumes "line" input. This works but you better have the right cables to mate with it this way.
The back panel doesn't have much other than a USB-C jack that I like and TRS line outs:
Note: I spelled Scarlett wrong in all the graphs below. Too lazy to edit them all now.
DAC Audio Measurements
Let's test each subsystem independently starting with DAC:
View attachment 41079
This is pretty good! We actually beat the company spec by good bit. Max output is I think 4.6 volts so this is not a powerhouse like higher end audio interfaces are.
SINAD of 102 is enough to place the Scarlett 2i2 in our competent bucket:
View attachment 41081
Dynamic range is good enough for 17 bits or so:
View attachment 41080
Noise level is not competitive with better desktop audiophile DACs though:
View attachment 41082
Jitter test shows the same elevated noise level but otherwise clean:
View attachment 41083
Linearity is near excellent:
View attachment 41084
Multitone shows increasing distortion with frequency:
View attachment 41085
Filter response is more or less one expects from default DAC chip settings:
View attachment 41086
We hit what is a seemingly major snag with we test at much higher bandwidth of 90 kHz:
View attachment 41087
Measured distortion+noise goes through the roof, rising to as much as 0.3%! Is the 2i2 this bad? Yes, and no. Let's first perform a wideband spectrum analysis of a 1 kHz tone:
View attachment 41088
Noise level sharply rises above 28 kHz. This is a feature of many DACs where noise in audible band is pushed into ultrasonics. The levels though seem low rising to "only" -85 dB. But that is misleading because FFT analysis artificially lowers the noise output of the device under test. Let's use a simple noise meter and see what we get:
View attachment 41089
At default 22.4 kHz I use for the dashboard measurement, the noise level is 25
microvolts (millionth of a volt). Increase the bandwidth to 90 kHz to capture the noise shaping and that value jumps 650 times higher to 16.3
millivolts (thousands of a volt).
Fortunately we don't hear ultrasonics and even if we did, this is pretty low level so it is more of a bother for our eyes in measurements than ears.
Headphone Amplifier Measurements
Jumping right into the heart of the matter with THD+N versus power into 300 ohm we get:
View attachment 41090
This is no good. We are getting power levels that we can get out of a smartphone or a $9 dongle attached to it.
The situation doesn't improve with 33 ohm load:
View attachment 41093
Now we have tons of distortion in addition to low output level.
Thankfully output impedance is low:
View attachment 41095
ADC Audio Measurements
Digitizing analog inputs is the main purpose of these interfaces so let's see how we do with a 1 kHz tone at 2 volts using XLR connection (i.e. "mic"):
View attachment 41096
This is quite good actually, once again landing the 2i2 into the competent bucket:
View attachment 41097
The above required gain settings at minimum so I thought I test the line input using TRS jacks:
View attachment 41098
Gain was lowered but distortion actually increased! Not sure why.
Either way, you can't use professional levels of 4 volts or more as you can with higher end products. 2 Volts is it.
Dynamic range is good with 2 volts in and near 0 dBFS capture:
View attachment 41099
Frequency response is very flat and nice, albeit stopping early on 192 kHz:
View attachment 41100
Linearity shows the better noise performance of XLR/mic input:
View attachment 41101
THD+N versus level shows the superiority of the Scarlett 2i2 compared to consumer interfaces:
View attachment 41102
Test using "jitter" signal (j-test" shows clean but elevated noise level:
View attachment 41103
1 kHz FFT spectrum shows the same:
View attachment 41104
A bit of oddness in THD+N versus frequency:
View attachment 41105
Conclusions
I can see why the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is such a popular audio interface. Its DAC and ADC both deliver competent performance with no dark corners. The only item performing well below expectation is the headphone amplifier. If you care about headphone monitoring, best get a proper amplifier to pair with it. With a single output though this may be a bit challenging.
Overall, I had low expectations going into this review and came out pleased. I
am happy to recommend the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 a very good budget audio interface.
--------
As always, questions, comments, corrections, etc. are welcome.
I understand getting Christmas presents for your pets is "a thing" now. With two dogs and half a dozen panthers, this bill adds up big time. So I appreciate
generous donation using :
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/