Because I consider it marketing deception, I will continue to harp on the "fradulent" aspect of modern amplifier power ratings. I see these misleading specs from new companies offering cheap amps. Most of them seem to be publishing "maximum" (peak?) power, some even at 1000Hz and 10% distortion. Although I still trust specs from NAD, Marantz, Rotel, and other traditional established manufacturers, I do not trust the specs from most of the companies making cheap amps with Tripath, TI, ST and similar amp-chips. This class of audio gear from gear is often marketed all over the internet under different labelsbrands for the same piece of gear. I have observed a couple examples of how the power ratings compared with older traditional specs - about 20%. That means a 500w amp is really a 100w amp. Dynamic headroom (the principle, not the old spec) seems to no longer be considered.
One of the most useful things Amir could to would be to take two similarly rated amps, one from a traditional manufacturer such as NAD, and compare it with one from a respected budget chip-amp maker like Topping or SMSL, and compare their performance. (I'm not interested in seeing anything lesser than the Topping/SMSL tier of products tested - the really cheapo stuff - even though I own a $20 Lepai 2020 T-amp.)
A couple of "modern" (vs. traditional) amplifier manufacturers such as IcePower and Hypex seem to be gaining respect over the past few years. (Although Icepower modules are from B&O, a 93 y/o Danish company - but their products were always considered "modern" and never what I would call conventional or traditional). I had a Teac A-H01 25wpc IcePower DAC/Amp that I really liked, and used for my first six years of expat life here in Panama, Unfortunately, it died recently because of a failed IC on the main board - probabaly a result of frequent power grid problems and thunderstorms. Even a good surge-protector / voltage regulator doesn't always prevent problems here.
IcePower and Hypex seem to be conservative with their power ratings, which I hoticed when I looked at
Stereophile's testing ot the NAD M22 which uses the Hypex NC400 module. The NC series Hypex modules do not have a built-in power supply like the newer NCore MP series. NAD claims to have built an excellent, robust power supply for the M22. But even allowing a for 100% markup to retail, a $375 amp module in a $2,999 power amp leaves about $1,175 for case, power supply, connectors and a bit of connection wiring.
Another Hypex amp similar to the NAD that seems to be marketed to a slightly more upscale crowd is the Nord 250wpc stereo unit. It uses the NC252MP module with on-board power supply, and sells for $790 (direct to consumer with no dealer markup), so no extra expence for their own discrete power supply.
However, to stay in the range for Amir's testing, I would recommend the $360
Audiophonics (France) PAS-125NC. It incorporates the same Hypex Ncore NC122MP module - rated at 2x75W @ 8Ω - as the $700 "
Nord One MP NC122 125W Stereo Power Amp." Again considering
value," is the Nord amp worth twice the price since it uses the same Hypex module with an on-board integrated power supply? (Both are sold direct - no retail or distributor markup.)
.
It's really hard to compare amplifiers as "apples to apples" with respect to power ratings these days. I will likely be very happy with my Toping PA3 which is on it's way to from Florida, but if I had a bit more to spend, the Audiophonics Hypex would get serious consideration. Audiophonics is an interesting French company that sells a wide range of audio gear, from "cheapo junk" to very good and quite expensive hardware.