If "them" is JBL 4367, I guess no. But in general definitely yes! Most commercial loudspeakers are not optimized to their full potential, that would mean too much work in the lab and too complex/expensive crossovers. One thing is that designers are trying to get the "house sound" apparent.But one thing i like to add
The question for me would be still is there a real benefit in soundquality to make them full-active? Or would it be enough to room eq them from outside?
But one thing i like to add
The question for me would be still is there a real benefit in soundquality to make them full-active? Or would it be enough to room eq them from outside?
If "them" is JBL 4367, I guess no. But in general definitely yes! Most commercial loudspeakers are not optimized to their full potential, that would mean too much work in the lab and too complex/expensive crossovers. One thing is that designers are trying to get the "house sound" apparent.
"The top air gets thin". Please put that in physical/measurement terms.
HeHe that would be a lot of cans with worms not only one. At least if we talk about this subjekt and not only about barometric measurements on mount everest. ; )
Still waiting for an explanation. That avoidance went straight into the waste basket.
Ok, imo this is a top speaker. To be honest for me a dream. This thing is for me great, sexy, hot. At the top for me! Ok people maybe like there 5inch woofers with 1inch dome tweeters thats absolutly ok. But this things are for me great sounding and can give you a great punch. Thats top for me. Power-hifi at it's best. Formula1 level. Shure there are people that enjoy a ls3/5 more. But not me. So is this direkt enough for you?
Still no rational explanation. I assume you don't have one and will end it here.
Still no rational explanation. I assume you don't have one and will end it here.
If "them" is JBL 4367, I guess no. But in general definitely yes! Most commercial loudspeakers are not optimized to their full potential, that would mean too much work in the lab and too complex/expensive crossovers. One thing is that designers are trying to get the "house sound" apparent.
I'am a little upset the first time here on ASR so whats your point?
@tomtoo said. "At the top air gets usually thin". Please put that in physical or measurement terms. This is something mountaineers say.
Does air pressure/density in the proximity of the loudspeaker get reduced? Should asthma sufferers be wary?
Your above post is loaded with generalities. Please be more informative.
I'am a little upset the first time here on ASR so whats your point?
"At the top the air gets usually thin". What does this mean re audio. Simple question. Maybe you can get @QMuse to help you give a rational/technical answer.
Engineering top level. To make engineering thats on top level better is hard(the air get's thin). Maybe it's not that way used in english. Its a word to word translation from German.
It means the higher you climb the harder it get's to make the next step.
Edit: please make a point. If you dont make a point you have nothing to say.
Thank you. Was that so difficult? I have learned something.
Thank you. Was that so difficult? I have learned something.
FWIW: The term 'air' is used subjectively by 'audiophiles' to describe something different.
Yes, couse i didnt get what you wanted.
But all ok peace!