I think the “banana case” referers to this poor mechanical quality of the case? (Uneven distance of the top cover)Oh dear, the banana case issue has escalated to distortion and the subjective sound quality.
I think the “banana case” referers to this poor mechanical quality of the case? (Uneven distance of the top cover)Oh dear, the banana case issue has escalated to distortion and the subjective sound quality.
Oh stop it for goodness sake!Maybe you can find a pixture of what you are telling us, on the Internet or from your archives, and show us what you are telling. I owned NAP250s and as you said had been in the NAIM factory many, many times wondering around as I wish as a friend of Julian. I have no recollection of a case issue as you describe.
That the case was ringing and you didn't notice but now you woke up from that stupor and remembered the ringing???
There seems to be a systematic error and I believe that @Buckeye Amps is trying to find it. Several hints were already given. The error would be inaudible, however from engineering point it should be corrected.I would be less concerned about the Buckeye exterior case and focus on measurement testing and corrective adjustments made before production and sales. Apparently, Rick's Buckeye Purifi measurement test hinted at elevated distortion as volume increased but this was not interpreted
Clearly the problem is that the panther isn't big enough, or trying hard enough. Upgrade the panther.I think the “banana case” referers to this poor mechanical quality of the case? (Uneven distance of the top cover)
View attachment 252185
Couple of washers on each side in the inside of the lid would stretch it just fine,it's the upper "ears" that cause this.I think the “banana case” referers to this poor mechanical quality of the case? (Uneven distance of the top cover)
View attachment 252185
Sorry, $1699. Not expecting to use washers.Couple of washers on each side in the inside of the lid would stretch it just fine,it's the upper "ears" that cause this.
I think the “banana case” referers to this poor mechanical quality of the case? (Uneven distance of the top cover)
Forgive me here, but Naim sold rapidly increasing price amps for decades with 'banana shaped' rectangular sleeve cases with slide-in inner tray, the sleeve ringing like a bell if the damping strip at the back was dislodged...
Why should I allow your demeaning posts go unanswered?Oh stop it for goodness sake!
What has the subjective quality of a preamplifier relate to the case quality of the power amplifier? You are doing your best to distract the argument.Naim fitted a plastic strip often used for holding papers together along the back edge with was pulled up to stop the ringing. of course I don't have bloody pictures to prove that I'm saying, as it was thirty odd years back, but I went with my pal to th efactory, met JV again and listened to the prottype 52 preamp (Naim's first proper high fidelity preamp which was able to reproduce reverb information properly we all felt who'd heard ot compared ot the 72 which was the previous top model). JV himself asked us if we thouight they were going on the right direction and we both said YES, not rtealising the extreme cost of the thing with supply box and the fact it'd be in the Olive cosmetic style as you pictured above.
Of course I will hold a torch for my friend. That’s what friends do!The cast outer cases did vary and some were definitely not true and straight. I was responding to the critique of the Schiit casing having gaps. if you still want to hold a torch for your late friend's company, then nothing I can say will change that.
I think I could live with that rise in distortion, but could not live with such ugliness.
I would be less concerned about the Buckeye exterior case and focus on measurement testing and corrective adjustments made before production and sales. Apparently, Rick's Buckeye Purifi measurement test hinted at elevated distortion as volume increased but this was not interpreted as a significant flaw by Dylan until Amir pointed it out in his review. Purifi modules should do better.
I'm not sure how costly the Buckeye fix will be or if it can really match the Audiophonics measurement. But I do know this should have been caught and fixed before production. We all love Dylan and he has brought us lots of amps at great prices. But once you get to the level of Purifi modules the implementation needs to be pristine, otherwise customers should simply get a $749 NC502MP. If any other company produced this product ASR posts would have treated them closer to the Hegel review rather than the comments posted here. I hope this is a one time miss at Buckeye amps as replacing boards is not inexpensive - especially for a discount producer. This miss may also alert readers to consider delaying Buckeye purchases until an ASR review is posted? Kumbaya
I LIKE the look of the unit.I think the “banana case” referers to this poor mechanical quality of the case? (Uneven distance of the top cover)
View attachment 252185
A third party that I work very closely with.Are these buffee boards your own design, or from a third party?
I quite like that radio shack look too... but not at $1,600 us!I LIKE the look of the unit.
How many HiFi Choice measurements would you like me to post here? SINAD in the 60's and 70's (IMD especially), interconnects between pre, supply and power amp which being unscreened (even now?) which audibly altered the perceived stereo soundfield (it didn't matter with the Linn speakers we then used), cases which set a style and brand identity but which were mostly as I describe (people genuinely aren't fussy really on things like that - I didn't notice but my OCD pal did and it bugged him after spending thousands on the stuff) and a young bods mindset which was so easily taken in by the Linn-Naim world and sold loads of it back then.Why should I allow your demeaning posts go unanswered?
What has the subjective quality of a preamplifier relate to the case quality of the power amplifier? You are doing your best to distract the argument.
Of course I will hold a torch for my friend. That’s what friends do!
Julian Vereker played an important role in Hi-Fi history. You demean his product’s quality. You even blamed him to have brainwashed you. But you can offer no proof, just words from an anonymous poster. Google finds thousands of pictures, neither shows any issues you listed.
It seems you have a grudge against NAIM and hence Julian. I hope this holiday season will allow you to reflect and get rid of any bad feeling you may be harbouring.
Could we just put this 'banana' argument to rest? ...pretending that bowing is caused by the fact that the PinkPanther has been on that Flexitarian diet, for a year?I think the “banana case” referers to this poor mechanical quality of the case? (Uneven distance of the top cover)